HE4 在卵巢肿瘤诊断中的预测作用

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Satya Kumari, Pratibha Kumari, Sangeeta Pankaj, Jyotsna Rani, Kavya Abhilashi, Vijayanand Choudhary, Jaya Kumari
{"title":"HE4 在卵巢肿瘤诊断中的预测作用","authors":"Satya Kumari, Pratibha Kumari, Sangeeta Pankaj, Jyotsna Rani, Kavya Abhilashi, Vijayanand Choudhary, Jaya Kumari","doi":"10.1007/s13224-023-01936-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 20% of women develop an ovarian cyst or pelvic mass at some point in their lives. Due to high false positivity of CA-125, women with various benign ovarian tumors simulating malignant masses undergo extensive debulking surgery resulting in increased morbidity. Serum HE4 is a useful test for better discrimination of benign or malignant nature of pelvic masses in preoperative period. Our study gives an update on the biological markers specifically CA-125 and a novel tumor marker HE4 and aims to reduce the debulking surgeries done for benign pathology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The total study population (<i>n</i> = 302) included women who were operated with suspicious ovarian malignant mass (<i>n</i> = 238) with benign (<i>n</i> = 98), borderline (<i>n</i> = 6), and malignant (<i>n</i> = 134) ovarian tumors. Cutoff of CA-125 was 35 U/mL, and for HE4 140 pM for postmenopausal and 70 pM for premenopausal women were calculated at 86% and 81% accuracy, respectively. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cutoff values of CA-125 were able to differentiate between benign, borderline, and malignant tumors with statistical significance (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas the cutoff values of HE4 significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) differentiated benign tumors from the malignant tumors, but not from the borderline tumors. Serum CA-125 has significantly higher sensitivity and NPV (95%, 72%, respectively) compared to HE4 (81%, 52%) and combined HE4 plus CA-125 (84%, 59%), whereas specificity, PPV, and AUC were higher for combined CA-125 plus HE4 (93%, 98%, 90%, respectively) compared to HE4 (83%, 95%, 88%) and CA-125 (48%, 88%, 87%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measuring serum HE4 along with CA-125 in preoperative diagnosis helps in excluding benign ovarian tumors in which CA-125 was falsely raised, especially in center where frozen section is not available, thus potentially decreasing morbid debulking surgeries done for benign ovarian tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"74 5","pages":"418-423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Role of HE4 in Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Satya Kumari, Pratibha Kumari, Sangeeta Pankaj, Jyotsna Rani, Kavya Abhilashi, Vijayanand Choudhary, Jaya Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13224-023-01936-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 20% of women develop an ovarian cyst or pelvic mass at some point in their lives. Due to high false positivity of CA-125, women with various benign ovarian tumors simulating malignant masses undergo extensive debulking surgery resulting in increased morbidity. Serum HE4 is a useful test for better discrimination of benign or malignant nature of pelvic masses in preoperative period. Our study gives an update on the biological markers specifically CA-125 and a novel tumor marker HE4 and aims to reduce the debulking surgeries done for benign pathology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The total study population (<i>n</i> = 302) included women who were operated with suspicious ovarian malignant mass (<i>n</i> = 238) with benign (<i>n</i> = 98), borderline (<i>n</i> = 6), and malignant (<i>n</i> = 134) ovarian tumors. Cutoff of CA-125 was 35 U/mL, and for HE4 140 pM for postmenopausal and 70 pM for premenopausal women were calculated at 86% and 81% accuracy, respectively. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cutoff values of CA-125 were able to differentiate between benign, borderline, and malignant tumors with statistical significance (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas the cutoff values of HE4 significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) differentiated benign tumors from the malignant tumors, but not from the borderline tumors. Serum CA-125 has significantly higher sensitivity and NPV (95%, 72%, respectively) compared to HE4 (81%, 52%) and combined HE4 plus CA-125 (84%, 59%), whereas specificity, PPV, and AUC were higher for combined CA-125 plus HE4 (93%, 98%, 90%, respectively) compared to HE4 (83%, 95%, 88%) and CA-125 (48%, 88%, 87%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measuring serum HE4 along with CA-125 in preoperative diagnosis helps in excluding benign ovarian tumors in which CA-125 was falsely raised, especially in center where frozen section is not available, thus potentially decreasing morbid debulking surgeries done for benign ovarian tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"volume\":\"74 5\",\"pages\":\"418-423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574215/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01936-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01936-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:约 20% 的女性在一生中的某个阶段会罹患卵巢囊肿或盆腔肿块。由于CA-125的假阳性率较高,患有各种良性卵巢肿瘤和恶性肿块的妇女不得不接受广泛的剥除手术,导致发病率增加。血清 HE4 是一种有用的检测方法,可在术前更好地鉴别盆腔肿块的良恶性。我们的研究提供了最新的生物标记物,特别是 CA-125 和新型肿瘤标记物 HE4,旨在减少良性病变的切除手术:研究对象(n = 302)包括因卵巢恶性肿瘤可疑肿块(n = 238)而接受手术的妇女,其中包括良性(n = 98)、边缘性(n = 6)和恶性(n = 134)卵巢肿瘤。CA-125 的临界值为 35 U/mL,绝经后妇女的 HE4 临界值为 140 pM,绝经前妇女的 HE4 临界值为 70 pM,准确率分别为 86% 和 81%。统计分析采用 SPSS 20 版:CA-125的临界值能够区分良性肿瘤、边缘性肿瘤和恶性肿瘤,且具有统计学意义(P P 结论):在术前诊断中测量血清 HE4 和 CA-125 有助于排除 CA-125 假性升高的良性卵巢肿瘤,尤其是在无法进行冰冻切片的中心,从而有可能减少良性卵巢肿瘤的病态切除手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Role of HE4 in Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors.

Background: Approximately 20% of women develop an ovarian cyst or pelvic mass at some point in their lives. Due to high false positivity of CA-125, women with various benign ovarian tumors simulating malignant masses undergo extensive debulking surgery resulting in increased morbidity. Serum HE4 is a useful test for better discrimination of benign or malignant nature of pelvic masses in preoperative period. Our study gives an update on the biological markers specifically CA-125 and a novel tumor marker HE4 and aims to reduce the debulking surgeries done for benign pathology.

Materials and methods: The total study population (n = 302) included women who were operated with suspicious ovarian malignant mass (n = 238) with benign (n = 98), borderline (n = 6), and malignant (n = 134) ovarian tumors. Cutoff of CA-125 was 35 U/mL, and for HE4 140 pM for postmenopausal and 70 pM for premenopausal women were calculated at 86% and 81% accuracy, respectively. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.

Results: The cutoff values of CA-125 were able to differentiate between benign, borderline, and malignant tumors with statistical significance (p < 0.05), whereas the cutoff values of HE4 significantly (p < 0.05) differentiated benign tumors from the malignant tumors, but not from the borderline tumors. Serum CA-125 has significantly higher sensitivity and NPV (95%, 72%, respectively) compared to HE4 (81%, 52%) and combined HE4 plus CA-125 (84%, 59%), whereas specificity, PPV, and AUC were higher for combined CA-125 plus HE4 (93%, 98%, 90%, respectively) compared to HE4 (83%, 95%, 88%) and CA-125 (48%, 88%, 87%).

Conclusion: Measuring serum HE4 along with CA-125 in preoperative diagnosis helps in excluding benign ovarian tumors in which CA-125 was falsely raised, especially in center where frozen section is not available, thus potentially decreasing morbid debulking surgeries done for benign ovarian tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信