{"title":"HE4 在卵巢肿瘤诊断中的预测作用","authors":"Satya Kumari, Pratibha Kumari, Sangeeta Pankaj, Jyotsna Rani, Kavya Abhilashi, Vijayanand Choudhary, Jaya Kumari","doi":"10.1007/s13224-023-01936-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 20% of women develop an ovarian cyst or pelvic mass at some point in their lives. Due to high false positivity of CA-125, women with various benign ovarian tumors simulating malignant masses undergo extensive debulking surgery resulting in increased morbidity. Serum HE4 is a useful test for better discrimination of benign or malignant nature of pelvic masses in preoperative period. Our study gives an update on the biological markers specifically CA-125 and a novel tumor marker HE4 and aims to reduce the debulking surgeries done for benign pathology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The total study population (<i>n</i> = 302) included women who were operated with suspicious ovarian malignant mass (<i>n</i> = 238) with benign (<i>n</i> = 98), borderline (<i>n</i> = 6), and malignant (<i>n</i> = 134) ovarian tumors. Cutoff of CA-125 was 35 U/mL, and for HE4 140 pM for postmenopausal and 70 pM for premenopausal women were calculated at 86% and 81% accuracy, respectively. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cutoff values of CA-125 were able to differentiate between benign, borderline, and malignant tumors with statistical significance (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas the cutoff values of HE4 significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) differentiated benign tumors from the malignant tumors, but not from the borderline tumors. Serum CA-125 has significantly higher sensitivity and NPV (95%, 72%, respectively) compared to HE4 (81%, 52%) and combined HE4 plus CA-125 (84%, 59%), whereas specificity, PPV, and AUC were higher for combined CA-125 plus HE4 (93%, 98%, 90%, respectively) compared to HE4 (83%, 95%, 88%) and CA-125 (48%, 88%, 87%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measuring serum HE4 along with CA-125 in preoperative diagnosis helps in excluding benign ovarian tumors in which CA-125 was falsely raised, especially in center where frozen section is not available, thus potentially decreasing morbid debulking surgeries done for benign ovarian tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"74 5","pages":"418-423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Role of HE4 in Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Satya Kumari, Pratibha Kumari, Sangeeta Pankaj, Jyotsna Rani, Kavya Abhilashi, Vijayanand Choudhary, Jaya Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13224-023-01936-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 20% of women develop an ovarian cyst or pelvic mass at some point in their lives. Due to high false positivity of CA-125, women with various benign ovarian tumors simulating malignant masses undergo extensive debulking surgery resulting in increased morbidity. Serum HE4 is a useful test for better discrimination of benign or malignant nature of pelvic masses in preoperative period. Our study gives an update on the biological markers specifically CA-125 and a novel tumor marker HE4 and aims to reduce the debulking surgeries done for benign pathology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The total study population (<i>n</i> = 302) included women who were operated with suspicious ovarian malignant mass (<i>n</i> = 238) with benign (<i>n</i> = 98), borderline (<i>n</i> = 6), and malignant (<i>n</i> = 134) ovarian tumors. Cutoff of CA-125 was 35 U/mL, and for HE4 140 pM for postmenopausal and 70 pM for premenopausal women were calculated at 86% and 81% accuracy, respectively. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cutoff values of CA-125 were able to differentiate between benign, borderline, and malignant tumors with statistical significance (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas the cutoff values of HE4 significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) differentiated benign tumors from the malignant tumors, but not from the borderline tumors. Serum CA-125 has significantly higher sensitivity and NPV (95%, 72%, respectively) compared to HE4 (81%, 52%) and combined HE4 plus CA-125 (84%, 59%), whereas specificity, PPV, and AUC were higher for combined CA-125 plus HE4 (93%, 98%, 90%, respectively) compared to HE4 (83%, 95%, 88%) and CA-125 (48%, 88%, 87%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measuring serum HE4 along with CA-125 in preoperative diagnosis helps in excluding benign ovarian tumors in which CA-125 was falsely raised, especially in center where frozen section is not available, thus potentially decreasing morbid debulking surgeries done for benign ovarian tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"volume\":\"74 5\",\"pages\":\"418-423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574215/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01936-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01936-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictive Role of HE4 in Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors.
Background: Approximately 20% of women develop an ovarian cyst or pelvic mass at some point in their lives. Due to high false positivity of CA-125, women with various benign ovarian tumors simulating malignant masses undergo extensive debulking surgery resulting in increased morbidity. Serum HE4 is a useful test for better discrimination of benign or malignant nature of pelvic masses in preoperative period. Our study gives an update on the biological markers specifically CA-125 and a novel tumor marker HE4 and aims to reduce the debulking surgeries done for benign pathology.
Materials and methods: The total study population (n = 302) included women who were operated with suspicious ovarian malignant mass (n = 238) with benign (n = 98), borderline (n = 6), and malignant (n = 134) ovarian tumors. Cutoff of CA-125 was 35 U/mL, and for HE4 140 pM for postmenopausal and 70 pM for premenopausal women were calculated at 86% and 81% accuracy, respectively. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.
Results: The cutoff values of CA-125 were able to differentiate between benign, borderline, and malignant tumors with statistical significance (p < 0.05), whereas the cutoff values of HE4 significantly (p < 0.05) differentiated benign tumors from the malignant tumors, but not from the borderline tumors. Serum CA-125 has significantly higher sensitivity and NPV (95%, 72%, respectively) compared to HE4 (81%, 52%) and combined HE4 plus CA-125 (84%, 59%), whereas specificity, PPV, and AUC were higher for combined CA-125 plus HE4 (93%, 98%, 90%, respectively) compared to HE4 (83%, 95%, 88%) and CA-125 (48%, 88%, 87%).
Conclusion: Measuring serum HE4 along with CA-125 in preoperative diagnosis helps in excluding benign ovarian tumors in which CA-125 was falsely raised, especially in center where frozen section is not available, thus potentially decreasing morbid debulking surgeries done for benign ovarian tumors.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: · Original Article· Case Report · Instrumentation and Techniques · Short Commentary · Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) · Pictorial Essay