超声应变成像用于描述无症状人群颈动脉中的动脉粥样硬化斑块。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Hendrik H.G. Hansen , Alies H.M. Bekkers , Inge C.L. van den Munckhof , Eveline van der Kolk , Frederick J.A. Meijer , Marinette van der Graaf , Joost H.W. Rutten , Chris L. de Korte
{"title":"超声应变成像用于描述无症状人群颈动脉中的动脉粥样硬化斑块。","authors":"Hendrik H.G. Hansen ,&nbsp;Alies H.M. Bekkers ,&nbsp;Inge C.L. van den Munckhof ,&nbsp;Eveline van der Kolk ,&nbsp;Frederick J.A. Meijer ,&nbsp;Marinette van der Graaf ,&nbsp;Joost H.W. Rutten ,&nbsp;Chris L. de Korte","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The rupture of vulnerable plaques in the carotid artery is a leading cause of strokes. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard for quantifying plaque composition, its high costs and lengthy procedure times limit large-scale use. Compound ultrasound strain imaging (CUSI) ultrasound offers a non-invasively alternative by assessing tissue deformation/strain within the arterial wall. Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between strain values and plaque composition, primarily focusing on longitudinal acquisitions, which only image the proximal and distal parts of the wall. This study examines CUSI in transverse imaging planes, which enables visualization of the entire cross-section of the vessel wall. CUSI has already been validated on a symptomatic population. Therefore, the aim is to determine whether CUSI can differentiate plaque composition in asymptomatic individuals with an increased cardiovascular risk profile, validated by MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study included 42 plaques in 28 participants. Ultrasound data were acquired with a Samsung Medison Accuvix V10 with an L5-13IS transducer and RF-interface. An experienced neuroradiologist classified plaques with MRI using the Siemens 3.0T MAGNETOM Skyra MRI (Erlangen, Germany) with a dedicated coil. Strain differences were compared across four plaque categories (calcified, lipid, hemorrhagic, fibrous/aspecific) and for vulnerable versus stable plaques.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A difference in strain values was found between lipid and calcified plaques (Kruskal–Wallis test, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Additionally, vulnerable plaques exhibited higher strain values than stable plaques (independent samples test, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CUSI values differ between lipid and calcified and between stable and vulnerable plaques. Minor differences were found between the other plaque types.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 2","pages":"Pages 321-329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound Strain Imaging for Characterizing Atherosclerotic Plaque in the Carotid Arteries of Asymptomatic Subjects\",\"authors\":\"Hendrik H.G. Hansen ,&nbsp;Alies H.M. Bekkers ,&nbsp;Inge C.L. van den Munckhof ,&nbsp;Eveline van der Kolk ,&nbsp;Frederick J.A. Meijer ,&nbsp;Marinette van der Graaf ,&nbsp;Joost H.W. Rutten ,&nbsp;Chris L. de Korte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The rupture of vulnerable plaques in the carotid artery is a leading cause of strokes. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard for quantifying plaque composition, its high costs and lengthy procedure times limit large-scale use. Compound ultrasound strain imaging (CUSI) ultrasound offers a non-invasively alternative by assessing tissue deformation/strain within the arterial wall. Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between strain values and plaque composition, primarily focusing on longitudinal acquisitions, which only image the proximal and distal parts of the wall. This study examines CUSI in transverse imaging planes, which enables visualization of the entire cross-section of the vessel wall. CUSI has already been validated on a symptomatic population. Therefore, the aim is to determine whether CUSI can differentiate plaque composition in asymptomatic individuals with an increased cardiovascular risk profile, validated by MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study included 42 plaques in 28 participants. Ultrasound data were acquired with a Samsung Medison Accuvix V10 with an L5-13IS transducer and RF-interface. An experienced neuroradiologist classified plaques with MRI using the Siemens 3.0T MAGNETOM Skyra MRI (Erlangen, Germany) with a dedicated coil. Strain differences were compared across four plaque categories (calcified, lipid, hemorrhagic, fibrous/aspecific) and for vulnerable versus stable plaques.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A difference in strain values was found between lipid and calcified plaques (Kruskal–Wallis test, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Additionally, vulnerable plaques exhibited higher strain values than stable plaques (independent samples test, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CUSI values differ between lipid and calcified and between stable and vulnerable plaques. Minor differences were found between the other plaque types.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 321-329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924004058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924004058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:颈动脉脆弱斑块的破裂是导致中风的主要原因。虽然磁共振成像(MRI)是量化斑块成分的标准,但其高昂的费用和漫长的手术时间限制了其大规模使用。复合超声应变成像(CUSI)超声通过评估动脉壁内的组织变形/应变,提供了一种无创的替代方法。之前的研究已经证明了应变值与斑块组成之间的关系,但主要集中在纵向采集上,因为纵向采集只能对动脉壁的近端和远端进行成像。本研究对横向成像平面的 CUSI 进行了检查,这样就能观察到血管壁的整个横截面。CUSI 已在有症状的人群中得到验证。因此,我们的目的是确定 CUSI 是否能区分心血管风险增加的无症状人群的斑块成分,并通过核磁共振成像进行验证:这项横断面研究包括 28 名参与者的 42 个斑块。超声数据由配备 L5-13IS 传感器和射频接口的 Samsung Medison Accuvix V10 采集。一位经验丰富的神经放射科医生使用带有专用线圈的西门子 3.0T MAGNETOM Skyra MRI(德国埃尔兰根)对斑块进行了核磁共振成像分类。比较了四个斑块类别(钙化、脂质、出血、纤维/特异性)的应变差异,以及易损斑块与稳定斑块的应变差异:结果:脂质斑块和钙化斑块的应变值存在差异(Kruskal-Wallis 检验,P < 0.05)。此外,易损斑块的应变值高于稳定斑块(独立样本检验,p < 0.05):结论:CUSI 值在脂质斑块和钙化斑块之间以及稳定斑块和易损斑块之间存在差异。结论:CUSI 值在脂质斑块和钙化斑块之间以及稳定斑块和易损斑块之间存在差异,其他斑块类型之间的差异较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound Strain Imaging for Characterizing Atherosclerotic Plaque in the Carotid Arteries of Asymptomatic Subjects

Objective

The rupture of vulnerable plaques in the carotid artery is a leading cause of strokes. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard for quantifying plaque composition, its high costs and lengthy procedure times limit large-scale use. Compound ultrasound strain imaging (CUSI) ultrasound offers a non-invasively alternative by assessing tissue deformation/strain within the arterial wall. Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between strain values and plaque composition, primarily focusing on longitudinal acquisitions, which only image the proximal and distal parts of the wall. This study examines CUSI in transverse imaging planes, which enables visualization of the entire cross-section of the vessel wall. CUSI has already been validated on a symptomatic population. Therefore, the aim is to determine whether CUSI can differentiate plaque composition in asymptomatic individuals with an increased cardiovascular risk profile, validated by MRI.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 42 plaques in 28 participants. Ultrasound data were acquired with a Samsung Medison Accuvix V10 with an L5-13IS transducer and RF-interface. An experienced neuroradiologist classified plaques with MRI using the Siemens 3.0T MAGNETOM Skyra MRI (Erlangen, Germany) with a dedicated coil. Strain differences were compared across four plaque categories (calcified, lipid, hemorrhagic, fibrous/aspecific) and for vulnerable versus stable plaques.

Results

A difference in strain values was found between lipid and calcified plaques (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.05). Additionally, vulnerable plaques exhibited higher strain values than stable plaques (independent samples test, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

CUSI values differ between lipid and calcified and between stable and vulnerable plaques. Minor differences were found between the other plaque types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信