指导方针不一致对儿科视力筛查转诊结果差异的影响。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Samantha J Sechrist, Alejandra G de Alba Campomanes
{"title":"指导方针不一致对儿科视力筛查转诊结果差异的影响。","authors":"Samantha J Sechrist, Alejandra G de Alba Campomanes","doi":"10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.104057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Yearly vision screenings, often performed in a primary care setting, are an important part of child health for detection of ocular disorders, but there are discrepancies in referral guidelines. Whereas guidelines provide consistent failure and referral criteria for 3- and 4-year-olds, criteria for older children disagree. To investigate the effect of having discordant guidelines, we retrospectively applied each guideline threshold to a cohort of 5- to 6-year-olds who underwent visual acuity screening during a well-child encounter and compared the results to the real-life referral rates. We found a 2.7-fold difference in the proportion of 5- to 6-year-olds children failing a vision screening and a difference in referral rate of 18%. Our results demonstrate that the existence of even mildly conflicting pediatric vision screening guidelines can lead to uncertainty among primary care providers who perform vision screening in children. We hope that this study will shed light on the problem and stimulate efforts to harmonize referral criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":50261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aapos","volume":" ","pages":"104057"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of inconsistent guidelines on variability in pediatric vision screening referral outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha J Sechrist, Alejandra G de Alba Campomanes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.104057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Yearly vision screenings, often performed in a primary care setting, are an important part of child health for detection of ocular disorders, but there are discrepancies in referral guidelines. Whereas guidelines provide consistent failure and referral criteria for 3- and 4-year-olds, criteria for older children disagree. To investigate the effect of having discordant guidelines, we retrospectively applied each guideline threshold to a cohort of 5- to 6-year-olds who underwent visual acuity screening during a well-child encounter and compared the results to the real-life referral rates. We found a 2.7-fold difference in the proportion of 5- to 6-year-olds children failing a vision screening and a difference in referral rate of 18%. Our results demonstrate that the existence of even mildly conflicting pediatric vision screening guidelines can lead to uncertainty among primary care providers who perform vision screening in children. We hope that this study will shed light on the problem and stimulate efforts to harmonize referral criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aapos\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aapos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.104057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aapos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.104057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每年一次的视力筛查通常在基层医疗机构进行,是儿童健康的重要组成部分,可用于检测眼部疾病,但转诊指南存在差异。虽然指南为 3-4 岁儿童提供了一致的失败和转诊标准,但对年龄较大儿童的标准却不一致。为了研究不一致的指南所带来的影响,我们回顾性地将每个指南阈值应用于在儿童健康检查中接受视力筛查的 5-6 岁儿童群体,并将结果与现实生活中的转诊率进行比较。我们发现,未通过视力筛查的 5-6 岁儿童比例相差 2.7 倍,转诊率相差 18%。我们的研究结果表明,即使存在轻微冲突的儿科视力筛查指南,也会导致为儿童进行视力筛查的初级保健提供者产生不确定性。我们希望这项研究能够揭示这一问题,并促进协调转诊标准的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of inconsistent guidelines on variability in pediatric vision screening referral outcomes.

Yearly vision screenings, often performed in a primary care setting, are an important part of child health for detection of ocular disorders, but there are discrepancies in referral guidelines. Whereas guidelines provide consistent failure and referral criteria for 3- and 4-year-olds, criteria for older children disagree. To investigate the effect of having discordant guidelines, we retrospectively applied each guideline threshold to a cohort of 5- to 6-year-olds who underwent visual acuity screening during a well-child encounter and compared the results to the real-life referral rates. We found a 2.7-fold difference in the proportion of 5- to 6-year-olds children failing a vision screening and a difference in referral rate of 18%. Our results demonstrate that the existence of even mildly conflicting pediatric vision screening guidelines can lead to uncertainty among primary care providers who perform vision screening in children. We hope that this study will shed light on the problem and stimulate efforts to harmonize referral criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aapos
Journal of Aapos 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Journal of AAPOS presents expert information on children''s eye diseases and on strabismus as it affects all age groups. Major articles by leading experts in the field cover clinical and investigative studies, treatments, case reports, surgical techniques, descriptions of instrumentation, current concept reviews, and new diagnostic techniques. The Journal is the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信