创伤患者护理点和实验室乳酸水平的一致性以及与输血的关系。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Vox Sanguinis Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1111/vox.13770
Biswadev Mitra, Madison Essery, Abha Somesh, Carly Talarico, Alexander Olaussen, David Anderson, Benjamin Meadley
{"title":"创伤患者护理点和实验室乳酸水平的一致性以及与输血的关系。","authors":"Biswadev Mitra, Madison Essery, Abha Somesh, Carly Talarico, Alexander Olaussen, David Anderson, Benjamin Meadley","doi":"10.1111/vox.13770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In the setting of trauma and suspected critical bleeding, indications to commence blood transfusions remain unclear, with high rates of potentially avoidable transfusions. Prehospital blood lactate measurements could help predict the need for blood transfusions. The aim of this study was to compare measurements detected by a point-of-care (POC) lactate device with laboratory measured lactate levels.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the emergency department. Eligible patients were those with suspected major trauma and critical bleeding. Venous or arterial blood samples were collected. POC measurements of lactate levels were conducted using a StatStrip Xpress® lactate meter and compared with laboratory values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 70 patients, the mean difference between the POC and laboratory lactate results was -0.19 mmol/L, with limits of agreement at -1.9 and 1.5. Most measurements (n = 66; 94.3%) were within the limits of agreement. A POC lactate level of >3.3 mmol/L had >90% specificity for transfusion, whereas a level <1.4 mmol/L had 90% sensitivity to rule out a transfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level of agreement of POC lactate with the laboratory lactate was high. Research on clinical decision rules for pre-hospital transfusion that incorporate POC lactate measures is therefore feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement of point-of-care and laboratory lactate levels among trauma patients and association with transfusion.\",\"authors\":\"Biswadev Mitra, Madison Essery, Abha Somesh, Carly Talarico, Alexander Olaussen, David Anderson, Benjamin Meadley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vox.13770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In the setting of trauma and suspected critical bleeding, indications to commence blood transfusions remain unclear, with high rates of potentially avoidable transfusions. Prehospital blood lactate measurements could help predict the need for blood transfusions. The aim of this study was to compare measurements detected by a point-of-care (POC) lactate device with laboratory measured lactate levels.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the emergency department. Eligible patients were those with suspected major trauma and critical bleeding. Venous or arterial blood samples were collected. POC measurements of lactate levels were conducted using a StatStrip Xpress® lactate meter and compared with laboratory values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 70 patients, the mean difference between the POC and laboratory lactate results was -0.19 mmol/L, with limits of agreement at -1.9 and 1.5. Most measurements (n = 66; 94.3%) were within the limits of agreement. A POC lactate level of >3.3 mmol/L had >90% specificity for transfusion, whereas a level <1.4 mmol/L had 90% sensitivity to rule out a transfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level of agreement of POC lactate with the laboratory lactate was high. Research on clinical decision rules for pre-hospital transfusion that incorporate POC lactate measures is therefore feasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13770\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在创伤和疑似危重出血的情况下,开始输血的指征仍不明确,潜在可避免的输血率很高。院前血乳酸测量有助于预测输血需求。本研究的目的是将护理点(POC)乳酸装置检测到的乳酸水平与实验室测量到的乳酸水平进行比较:这是一项在急诊科进行的横断面研究。符合条件的患者为疑似重大创伤和危重出血患者。采集静脉或动脉血样本。使用 StatStrip Xpress® 乳酸测量仪进行乳酸水平的 POC 测量,并与实验室值进行比较:结果:在 70 名患者中,POC 和实验室乳酸结果之间的平均差异为-0.19 mmol/L,差异范围为-1.9 和 1.5。大多数测量结果(n = 66;94.3%)都在一致范围内。POC 乳酸水平 >3.3 mmol/L 对输血的特异性大于 90%,而 POC 乳酸水平 >3.3 mmol/L 对输血的特异性小于 90%:POC 乳酸水平与实验室乳酸水平的一致性很高。因此,研究结合 POC 乳酸测量结果的院前输血临床决策规则是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agreement of point-of-care and laboratory lactate levels among trauma patients and association with transfusion.

Background and objectives: In the setting of trauma and suspected critical bleeding, indications to commence blood transfusions remain unclear, with high rates of potentially avoidable transfusions. Prehospital blood lactate measurements could help predict the need for blood transfusions. The aim of this study was to compare measurements detected by a point-of-care (POC) lactate device with laboratory measured lactate levels.

Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the emergency department. Eligible patients were those with suspected major trauma and critical bleeding. Venous or arterial blood samples were collected. POC measurements of lactate levels were conducted using a StatStrip Xpress® lactate meter and compared with laboratory values.

Results: Among 70 patients, the mean difference between the POC and laboratory lactate results was -0.19 mmol/L, with limits of agreement at -1.9 and 1.5. Most measurements (n = 66; 94.3%) were within the limits of agreement. A POC lactate level of >3.3 mmol/L had >90% specificity for transfusion, whereas a level <1.4 mmol/L had 90% sensitivity to rule out a transfusion.

Conclusion: The level of agreement of POC lactate with the laboratory lactate was high. Research on clinical decision rules for pre-hospital transfusion that incorporate POC lactate measures is therefore feasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vox Sanguinis
Vox Sanguinis 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections: 1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention: Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood; Bacterial contamination of blood components; Donor recruitment and selection methods; Pathogen inactivation. 2) Blood Component Collection and Production: Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis); Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives; Preparation of labile blood components; Inventory management; Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage; Collection and storage of tissues; Quality management and good manufacturing practice; Automation and information technology. 3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies: Transfusion thresholds and audits; Haemovigilance; Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy; Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion; Therapeutic apheresis; Support of transplant patients; Gene therapy and immunotherapy. 4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics: Autoimmunity in haematology; Alloimmunity of blood; Pre-transfusion testing; Immunodiagnostics; Immunobiology; Complement in immunohaematology; Blood typing reagents; Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function; Genetic markers and disease; Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology. 5) Cellular Therapy: Cell-based therapies; Stem cell sources; Stem cell processing and storage; Stem cell products; Stem cell plasticity; Regenerative medicine with cells; Cellular immunotherapy; Molecular therapy; Gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信