Biswadev Mitra, Madison Essery, Abha Somesh, Carly Talarico, Alexander Olaussen, David Anderson, Benjamin Meadley
{"title":"创伤患者护理点和实验室乳酸水平的一致性以及与输血的关系。","authors":"Biswadev Mitra, Madison Essery, Abha Somesh, Carly Talarico, Alexander Olaussen, David Anderson, Benjamin Meadley","doi":"10.1111/vox.13770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In the setting of trauma and suspected critical bleeding, indications to commence blood transfusions remain unclear, with high rates of potentially avoidable transfusions. Prehospital blood lactate measurements could help predict the need for blood transfusions. The aim of this study was to compare measurements detected by a point-of-care (POC) lactate device with laboratory measured lactate levels.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the emergency department. Eligible patients were those with suspected major trauma and critical bleeding. Venous or arterial blood samples were collected. POC measurements of lactate levels were conducted using a StatStrip Xpress® lactate meter and compared with laboratory values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 70 patients, the mean difference between the POC and laboratory lactate results was -0.19 mmol/L, with limits of agreement at -1.9 and 1.5. Most measurements (n = 66; 94.3%) were within the limits of agreement. A POC lactate level of >3.3 mmol/L had >90% specificity for transfusion, whereas a level <1.4 mmol/L had 90% sensitivity to rule out a transfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level of agreement of POC lactate with the laboratory lactate was high. Research on clinical decision rules for pre-hospital transfusion that incorporate POC lactate measures is therefore feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement of point-of-care and laboratory lactate levels among trauma patients and association with transfusion.\",\"authors\":\"Biswadev Mitra, Madison Essery, Abha Somesh, Carly Talarico, Alexander Olaussen, David Anderson, Benjamin Meadley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vox.13770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In the setting of trauma and suspected critical bleeding, indications to commence blood transfusions remain unclear, with high rates of potentially avoidable transfusions. Prehospital blood lactate measurements could help predict the need for blood transfusions. The aim of this study was to compare measurements detected by a point-of-care (POC) lactate device with laboratory measured lactate levels.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the emergency department. Eligible patients were those with suspected major trauma and critical bleeding. Venous or arterial blood samples were collected. POC measurements of lactate levels were conducted using a StatStrip Xpress® lactate meter and compared with laboratory values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 70 patients, the mean difference between the POC and laboratory lactate results was -0.19 mmol/L, with limits of agreement at -1.9 and 1.5. Most measurements (n = 66; 94.3%) were within the limits of agreement. A POC lactate level of >3.3 mmol/L had >90% specificity for transfusion, whereas a level <1.4 mmol/L had 90% sensitivity to rule out a transfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level of agreement of POC lactate with the laboratory lactate was high. Research on clinical decision rules for pre-hospital transfusion that incorporate POC lactate measures is therefore feasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13770\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Agreement of point-of-care and laboratory lactate levels among trauma patients and association with transfusion.
Background and objectives: In the setting of trauma and suspected critical bleeding, indications to commence blood transfusions remain unclear, with high rates of potentially avoidable transfusions. Prehospital blood lactate measurements could help predict the need for blood transfusions. The aim of this study was to compare measurements detected by a point-of-care (POC) lactate device with laboratory measured lactate levels.
Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the emergency department. Eligible patients were those with suspected major trauma and critical bleeding. Venous or arterial blood samples were collected. POC measurements of lactate levels were conducted using a StatStrip Xpress® lactate meter and compared with laboratory values.
Results: Among 70 patients, the mean difference between the POC and laboratory lactate results was -0.19 mmol/L, with limits of agreement at -1.9 and 1.5. Most measurements (n = 66; 94.3%) were within the limits of agreement. A POC lactate level of >3.3 mmol/L had >90% specificity for transfusion, whereas a level <1.4 mmol/L had 90% sensitivity to rule out a transfusion.
Conclusion: The level of agreement of POC lactate with the laboratory lactate was high. Research on clinical decision rules for pre-hospital transfusion that incorporate POC lactate measures is therefore feasible.
期刊介绍:
Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections:
1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention:
Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood;
Bacterial contamination of blood components;
Donor recruitment and selection methods;
Pathogen inactivation.
2) Blood Component Collection and Production:
Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis);
Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives;
Preparation of labile blood components;
Inventory management;
Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage;
Collection and storage of tissues;
Quality management and good manufacturing practice;
Automation and information technology.
3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies:
Transfusion thresholds and audits;
Haemovigilance;
Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy;
Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion;
Therapeutic apheresis;
Support of transplant patients;
Gene therapy and immunotherapy.
4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics:
Autoimmunity in haematology;
Alloimmunity of blood;
Pre-transfusion testing;
Immunodiagnostics;
Immunobiology;
Complement in immunohaematology;
Blood typing reagents;
Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function;
Genetic markers and disease;
Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology.
5) Cellular Therapy:
Cell-based therapies;
Stem cell sources;
Stem cell processing and storage;
Stem cell products;
Stem cell plasticity;
Regenerative medicine with cells;
Cellular immunotherapy;
Molecular therapy;
Gene therapy.