线索位置和物体方位对基于物体的注意力的影响

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Hao Lou , Karin S. Pilz , Monicque M. Lorist
{"title":"线索位置和物体方位对基于物体的注意力的影响","authors":"Hao Lou ,&nbsp;Karin S. Pilz ,&nbsp;Monicque M. Lorist","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spatial cues have previously been found to facilitate information processing not only at cued locations but also within cued objects, so-called object-based attention. We used different variants of the classic two-rectangle paradigm to investigate the interaction of cue location and object orientation on object-based attentional effects. First, we re-analyzed data from a prior study using the classical two-rectangle paradigm. We expected faster attentional shifts along the horizontal compared to the vertical meridian. Results confirmed that cue location and rectangle orientation interactively influence object-based attention, with horizontal objects combined with upper left visual field cues eliciting faster responses than other conditions. In Experiment 2, we removed object contours to examine the benefits of shifting attention based purely on cue location. The results showed that these differences remained, indicating that attentional shifts are not solely guided by object contours. In Experiment 3, we added a third possible target location to the original two-rectangle experiment to examine whether attentional shifts followed a predictable pattern across the stimulus display. Despite faster responses to cued targets, no consistent and organized visual search pattern was observed when participants searched for targets at invalidly cued locations. Our findings suggest that object-based effects are influenced by both cue location and the orientation of attentional shifts. Shifts from left to right in the upper visual field consistently demonstrated significant benefits, whereas the benefits of vertical shifts were less consistent across experiments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 108521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of cue location and object orientation on object-based attention\",\"authors\":\"Hao Lou ,&nbsp;Karin S. Pilz ,&nbsp;Monicque M. Lorist\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Spatial cues have previously been found to facilitate information processing not only at cued locations but also within cued objects, so-called object-based attention. We used different variants of the classic two-rectangle paradigm to investigate the interaction of cue location and object orientation on object-based attentional effects. First, we re-analyzed data from a prior study using the classical two-rectangle paradigm. We expected faster attentional shifts along the horizontal compared to the vertical meridian. Results confirmed that cue location and rectangle orientation interactively influence object-based attention, with horizontal objects combined with upper left visual field cues eliciting faster responses than other conditions. In Experiment 2, we removed object contours to examine the benefits of shifting attention based purely on cue location. The results showed that these differences remained, indicating that attentional shifts are not solely guided by object contours. In Experiment 3, we added a third possible target location to the original two-rectangle experiment to examine whether attentional shifts followed a predictable pattern across the stimulus display. Despite faster responses to cued targets, no consistent and organized visual search pattern was observed when participants searched for targets at invalidly cued locations. Our findings suggest that object-based effects are influenced by both cue location and the orientation of attentional shifts. Shifts from left to right in the upper visual field consistently demonstrated significant benefits, whereas the benefits of vertical shifts were less consistent across experiments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001652\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以前曾有研究发现,空间线索不仅能促进提示位置的信息处理,还能促进提示对象内部的信息处理,即所谓的基于对象的注意。我们使用了经典双角范式的不同变体来研究线索位置和对象方位对基于对象的注意效应的交互作用。首先,我们重新分析了之前使用经典双矩形范式研究的数据。我们预计,与垂直经线相比,沿水平经线的注意力转移速度更快。结果证实,提示位置和矩形方向会交互影响基于物体的注意力,与其他条件相比,水平物体与左上方视野提示相结合会引起更快的反应。在实验 2 中,我们去掉了物体轮廓,以研究纯粹根据提示位置转移注意力的益处。结果显示,这些差异依然存在,表明注意力的转移并不完全受物体轮廓线的引导。在实验 3 中,我们在原来的双矩形实验中增加了第三个可能的目标位置,以考察注意力转移是否遵循整个刺激显示的可预测模式。尽管被试对提示目标的反应更快,但当被试在无效提示位置搜索目标时,并没有观察到一致且有组织的视觉搜索模式。我们的研究结果表明,基于目标的效应同时受到提示位置和注意力转移方向的影响。在上视野中从左到右的转移始终表现出显著的益处,而垂直转移的益处在不同实验中的表现则不太一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of cue location and object orientation on object-based attention
Spatial cues have previously been found to facilitate information processing not only at cued locations but also within cued objects, so-called object-based attention. We used different variants of the classic two-rectangle paradigm to investigate the interaction of cue location and object orientation on object-based attentional effects. First, we re-analyzed data from a prior study using the classical two-rectangle paradigm. We expected faster attentional shifts along the horizontal compared to the vertical meridian. Results confirmed that cue location and rectangle orientation interactively influence object-based attention, with horizontal objects combined with upper left visual field cues eliciting faster responses than other conditions. In Experiment 2, we removed object contours to examine the benefits of shifting attention based purely on cue location. The results showed that these differences remained, indicating that attentional shifts are not solely guided by object contours. In Experiment 3, we added a third possible target location to the original two-rectangle experiment to examine whether attentional shifts followed a predictable pattern across the stimulus display. Despite faster responses to cued targets, no consistent and organized visual search pattern was observed when participants searched for targets at invalidly cued locations. Our findings suggest that object-based effects are influenced by both cue location and the orientation of attentional shifts. Shifts from left to right in the upper visual field consistently demonstrated significant benefits, whereas the benefits of vertical shifts were less consistent across experiments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vision Research
Vision Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信