{"title":"白金一小时急诊科住院时间与创伤患者的治疗效果。","authors":"Samantha LaRosa, Katherine Moore, Nate Harshaw, Mickel Voigt, Megha Tilvawala, Lindsey L Perea","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trauma bay and emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) are important time measures in patient care. The data on this subject are inconclusive or specific to one condition. Our goal was to determine the relationship between ED LOS and outcomes or mortality of trauma patients. We sought to investigate certain cofactors which influence this relationship. We hypothesized that ED LOS will be correlated with negative patient outcomes and mortality for moderately and severely injured trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted from June 2018 to June 2022 at our level 1 Trauma center. Patients ≥18 y that arrived as a trauma activation were included. Patients were excluded if they were transfers in or out, expired before arrival, or were discharged from the ED. Univariate and multivariable statistical analysis based on disposition time were performed. The primary outcome was mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six thousand seven hundred eighty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were stratified based on time to disposition ≤60 (n = 521) and >60 min (n = 6260). The ≤60-min group was younger than the >60-min group (53 (interquartile range (IQR) 30-73) versus 68 (IQR 48-82), P < 0.001), and was more often male (69.48% (n = 362) versus 50.32% (n = 3150), P < 0.001). The ≤60-min group had a lower Glasgow Coma Scale (14 (IQR 8-15) versus 15 (IQR 15-15), P < 0.001), a longer intensive care unit LOS (2 (IQR 1-5) versus 1 (IQR 1-3), P < 0.001), a longer hospital LOS (4 (IQR 1-10) versus 3 (IQR 2-6), P < 0.001), and a greater Injury Severity Score (13 (IQR 5-22) versus 5 (IQR 4-10), P < 0.001) compared to the >60-min group. The ≤60-min group was also more likely to receive blood products (39.92% (n = 208) versus 13.15% (n = 823), P < 0.001) compared to the >60-min group. A greater risk of mortality was found in the ≤60-min versus >60-min group (17.47% (n = 91) versus 2.75% (172), P < 0.001). The ≤60-min group had a shorter transport time (14 (IQR 8-21) versus 17 (IQR 11-24), P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, there was an association between a disposition time of 60 min or less and a decreased risk of mortality. However, men had a greater risk of mortality compared to women. Patients that received blood products and patients with more severe injuries had a higher likelihood of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trauma patients with a decreased ED LOS had a higher rate of mortality, contrary to our hypothesis. The patients with a decreased ED LOS were also more severely injured. It may be reasonable that trauma patients can receive the same level of care regardless of location in the hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"304 ","pages":"237-245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platinum Hour: Emergency Department Length of Stay and Trauma Patients' Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha LaRosa, Katherine Moore, Nate Harshaw, Mickel Voigt, Megha Tilvawala, Lindsey L Perea\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trauma bay and emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) are important time measures in patient care. The data on this subject are inconclusive or specific to one condition. Our goal was to determine the relationship between ED LOS and outcomes or mortality of trauma patients. We sought to investigate certain cofactors which influence this relationship. We hypothesized that ED LOS will be correlated with negative patient outcomes and mortality for moderately and severely injured trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted from June 2018 to June 2022 at our level 1 Trauma center. Patients ≥18 y that arrived as a trauma activation were included. Patients were excluded if they were transfers in or out, expired before arrival, or were discharged from the ED. Univariate and multivariable statistical analysis based on disposition time were performed. The primary outcome was mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six thousand seven hundred eighty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were stratified based on time to disposition ≤60 (n = 521) and >60 min (n = 6260). The ≤60-min group was younger than the >60-min group (53 (interquartile range (IQR) 30-73) versus 68 (IQR 48-82), P < 0.001), and was more often male (69.48% (n = 362) versus 50.32% (n = 3150), P < 0.001). The ≤60-min group had a lower Glasgow Coma Scale (14 (IQR 8-15) versus 15 (IQR 15-15), P < 0.001), a longer intensive care unit LOS (2 (IQR 1-5) versus 1 (IQR 1-3), P < 0.001), a longer hospital LOS (4 (IQR 1-10) versus 3 (IQR 2-6), P < 0.001), and a greater Injury Severity Score (13 (IQR 5-22) versus 5 (IQR 4-10), P < 0.001) compared to the >60-min group. The ≤60-min group was also more likely to receive blood products (39.92% (n = 208) versus 13.15% (n = 823), P < 0.001) compared to the >60-min group. A greater risk of mortality was found in the ≤60-min versus >60-min group (17.47% (n = 91) versus 2.75% (172), P < 0.001). The ≤60-min group had a shorter transport time (14 (IQR 8-21) versus 17 (IQR 11-24), P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, there was an association between a disposition time of 60 min or less and a decreased risk of mortality. However, men had a greater risk of mortality compared to women. Patients that received blood products and patients with more severe injuries had a higher likelihood of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trauma patients with a decreased ED LOS had a higher rate of mortality, contrary to our hypothesis. The patients with a decreased ED LOS were also more severely injured. It may be reasonable that trauma patients can receive the same level of care regardless of location in the hospital.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"304 \",\"pages\":\"237-245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Platinum Hour: Emergency Department Length of Stay and Trauma Patients' Outcomes.
Introduction: Trauma bay and emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) are important time measures in patient care. The data on this subject are inconclusive or specific to one condition. Our goal was to determine the relationship between ED LOS and outcomes or mortality of trauma patients. We sought to investigate certain cofactors which influence this relationship. We hypothesized that ED LOS will be correlated with negative patient outcomes and mortality for moderately and severely injured trauma patients.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from June 2018 to June 2022 at our level 1 Trauma center. Patients ≥18 y that arrived as a trauma activation were included. Patients were excluded if they were transfers in or out, expired before arrival, or were discharged from the ED. Univariate and multivariable statistical analysis based on disposition time were performed. The primary outcome was mortality.
Results: Six thousand seven hundred eighty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were stratified based on time to disposition ≤60 (n = 521) and >60 min (n = 6260). The ≤60-min group was younger than the >60-min group (53 (interquartile range (IQR) 30-73) versus 68 (IQR 48-82), P < 0.001), and was more often male (69.48% (n = 362) versus 50.32% (n = 3150), P < 0.001). The ≤60-min group had a lower Glasgow Coma Scale (14 (IQR 8-15) versus 15 (IQR 15-15), P < 0.001), a longer intensive care unit LOS (2 (IQR 1-5) versus 1 (IQR 1-3), P < 0.001), a longer hospital LOS (4 (IQR 1-10) versus 3 (IQR 2-6), P < 0.001), and a greater Injury Severity Score (13 (IQR 5-22) versus 5 (IQR 4-10), P < 0.001) compared to the >60-min group. The ≤60-min group was also more likely to receive blood products (39.92% (n = 208) versus 13.15% (n = 823), P < 0.001) compared to the >60-min group. A greater risk of mortality was found in the ≤60-min versus >60-min group (17.47% (n = 91) versus 2.75% (172), P < 0.001). The ≤60-min group had a shorter transport time (14 (IQR 8-21) versus 17 (IQR 11-24), P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, there was an association between a disposition time of 60 min or less and a decreased risk of mortality. However, men had a greater risk of mortality compared to women. Patients that received blood products and patients with more severe injuries had a higher likelihood of mortality.
Conclusions: Trauma patients with a decreased ED LOS had a higher rate of mortality, contrary to our hypothesis. The patients with a decreased ED LOS were also more severely injured. It may be reasonable that trauma patients can receive the same level of care regardless of location in the hospital.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.