Xiufen Wang , Bin Chen , Lu Fang , Jieyu Wang , Aike Xu , Wen Xu , Xiaomei Tong
{"title":"使用孕激素刺激卵巢方案或促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案进行植入前非整倍体基因检测后的非整倍体率和临床妊娠结果。","authors":"Xiufen Wang , Bin Chen , Lu Fang , Jieyu Wang , Aike Xu , Wen Xu , Xiaomei Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the chromosome abnormality rates and clinical pregnancy outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using either the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol or the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 431 PGT-A cycles in which controlled ovarian stimulation was performed using the PPOS protocol (<em>n</em> = 320 cycles) or GnRH antagonist protocol (<em>n</em> = 111 cycles) between January 2018 and December 2021. Frozen embryo transfer was subsequently performed in 307 cycles with transferable blastocysts. The number of retrieved oocytes, embryo development, next-generation sequencing results, and clinical pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two protocols. The primary outcome measure was the aneuploidy rate. Secondary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy per first frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle and cumulative live birth rates per PGT-A cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no statistically significant between-group differences in the number of retrieved oocytes, available blastocysts, and high-quality blastocyst rate. The aneuploidy rates were similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy outcomes, including the clinical pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, live birth, or cumulative live birth rates, after frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles (<em>P</em>>0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study found no significant differences in the aneuploidy rate, clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate after PGT-A cycles between those using the PPOS protocol and those using the GnRH antagonist protocol.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"54 2","pages":"Article 102883"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aneuploidy rates and clinical pregnancy outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol or the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol\",\"authors\":\"Xiufen Wang , Bin Chen , Lu Fang , Jieyu Wang , Aike Xu , Wen Xu , Xiaomei Tong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the chromosome abnormality rates and clinical pregnancy outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using either the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol or the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 431 PGT-A cycles in which controlled ovarian stimulation was performed using the PPOS protocol (<em>n</em> = 320 cycles) or GnRH antagonist protocol (<em>n</em> = 111 cycles) between January 2018 and December 2021. Frozen embryo transfer was subsequently performed in 307 cycles with transferable blastocysts. The number of retrieved oocytes, embryo development, next-generation sequencing results, and clinical pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two protocols. The primary outcome measure was the aneuploidy rate. Secondary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy per first frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle and cumulative live birth rates per PGT-A cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no statistically significant between-group differences in the number of retrieved oocytes, available blastocysts, and high-quality blastocyst rate. The aneuploidy rates were similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy outcomes, including the clinical pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, live birth, or cumulative live birth rates, after frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles (<em>P</em>>0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study found no significant differences in the aneuploidy rate, clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate after PGT-A cycles between those using the PPOS protocol and those using the GnRH antagonist protocol.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"54 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 102883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001624\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001624","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Aneuploidy rates and clinical pregnancy outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol or the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol
Objective
To investigate the chromosome abnormality rates and clinical pregnancy outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using either the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol or the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.
Methods
The study included 431 PGT-A cycles in which controlled ovarian stimulation was performed using the PPOS protocol (n = 320 cycles) or GnRH antagonist protocol (n = 111 cycles) between January 2018 and December 2021. Frozen embryo transfer was subsequently performed in 307 cycles with transferable blastocysts. The number of retrieved oocytes, embryo development, next-generation sequencing results, and clinical pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two protocols. The primary outcome measure was the aneuploidy rate. Secondary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy per first frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle and cumulative live birth rates per PGT-A cycle.
Results
There were no statistically significant between-group differences in the number of retrieved oocytes, available blastocysts, and high-quality blastocyst rate. The aneuploidy rates were similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy outcomes, including the clinical pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, live birth, or cumulative live birth rates, after frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles (P>0.05).
Conclusions
The study found no significant differences in the aneuploidy rate, clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate after PGT-A cycles between those using the PPOS protocol and those using the GnRH antagonist protocol.
期刊介绍:
Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF).
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines.
Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.