使用丝裂霉素 C 对小梁切除术后的早期瘢痕眼泡进行手术修补的三年疗效。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Risa Caraher-Masuda, Mari Sakamoto, Mina Okuda, Fumio Takano, Sotaro Mori, Kaori Ueda, Akiyasu Kanamori, Yuko Yamada-Nakanishi, Makoto Nakamura
{"title":"使用丝裂霉素 C 对小梁切除术后的早期瘢痕眼泡进行手术修补的三年疗效。","authors":"Risa Caraher-Masuda, Mari Sakamoto, Mina Okuda, Fumio Takano, Sotaro Mori, Kaori Ueda, Akiyasu Kanamori, Yuko Yamada-Nakanishi, Makoto Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s10384-024-01142-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the 3-year outcomes of surgical bleb revision (SBR) with mitomycin C (MMC) for early scarring bleb after trabeculectomy (TLE).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included glaucoma patients aged ≧ 18 who underwent SBR with MMC within 6 months of their first TLE at Kobe University Hospital and were followed for at least 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the three-year success rate of SBR. We defined surgical success as: intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction ≧ 20% from baseline and 5 ≦ IOP ≦ 18 mmHg. Failure was defined when the IOP deviated from the criteria, when the eye required additional glaucoma surgery, and when the eye lost light perception. Complete success (CS) was success without glaucoma medications and qualified success (QS) was success with glaucoma medications. The secondary outcome measures included IOP, the number of glaucoma medications, mean deviation (MD), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), and surgical complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight eyes of 68 patients were analyzed. The median interval between initial TLE and SBR was 2 months. Overall success rate at three-year after SBR were 45.1% and 9.6% for QS and CS, respectively. A greater number of medications used before TLE was a contributing factor to failure (P = 0.02). 22 eyes (32.4%) underwent additional glaucoma surgery, and 41 eyes (60.3%) were spared from additional glaucoma surgery within 3 years after SBR. The median IOP decreased form 24.0 mmHg to 11.0 mmHg 3 years after SBR, and the number of medications decreased from 4 to 2 (P < 0.01). MD remained unchanged, but BCVA and ECD decreased at 3years postoperatively. There were no serious complications of SBR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBR may be an effective treatment option for early scarring blebs after TLE but is unsuccessful in eyes that have used many glaucoma medications prior to TLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-year outcomes of surgical bleb revision with mitomycin C for early scarring bleb after trabeculectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Risa Caraher-Masuda, Mari Sakamoto, Mina Okuda, Fumio Takano, Sotaro Mori, Kaori Ueda, Akiyasu Kanamori, Yuko Yamada-Nakanishi, Makoto Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10384-024-01142-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the 3-year outcomes of surgical bleb revision (SBR) with mitomycin C (MMC) for early scarring bleb after trabeculectomy (TLE).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included glaucoma patients aged ≧ 18 who underwent SBR with MMC within 6 months of their first TLE at Kobe University Hospital and were followed for at least 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the three-year success rate of SBR. We defined surgical success as: intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction ≧ 20% from baseline and 5 ≦ IOP ≦ 18 mmHg. Failure was defined when the IOP deviated from the criteria, when the eye required additional glaucoma surgery, and when the eye lost light perception. Complete success (CS) was success without glaucoma medications and qualified success (QS) was success with glaucoma medications. The secondary outcome measures included IOP, the number of glaucoma medications, mean deviation (MD), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), and surgical complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight eyes of 68 patients were analyzed. The median interval between initial TLE and SBR was 2 months. Overall success rate at three-year after SBR were 45.1% and 9.6% for QS and CS, respectively. A greater number of medications used before TLE was a contributing factor to failure (P = 0.02). 22 eyes (32.4%) underwent additional glaucoma surgery, and 41 eyes (60.3%) were spared from additional glaucoma surgery within 3 years after SBR. The median IOP decreased form 24.0 mmHg to 11.0 mmHg 3 years after SBR, and the number of medications decreased from 4 to 2 (P < 0.01). MD remained unchanged, but BCVA and ECD decreased at 3years postoperatively. There were no serious complications of SBR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBR may be an effective treatment option for early scarring blebs after TLE but is unsuccessful in eyes that have used many glaucoma medications prior to TLE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-024-01142-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-024-01142-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:报告使用丝裂霉素C(MMC)对小梁切除术(TLE)后早期瘢痕形成的眼泡进行手术修整(SBR)的3年结果:研究设计:回顾性观察研究:我们纳入了在神户大学医院首次接受小梁切除术后6个月内接受SBR联合MMC治疗的年龄≧18岁的青光眼患者,并对其进行了至少6个月的随访。主要结果指标是 SBR 的三年成功率。我们将手术成功定义为:眼压(IOP)比基线降低≧ 20%,且 5 ≦ IOP ≦ 18 mmHg。当眼压偏离标准、眼睛需要进行额外的青光眼手术以及眼睛失去光感时,即定义为失败。完全成功(CS)是指未使用青光眼药物的成功,合格成功(QS)是指使用青光眼药物的成功。次要结果指标包括眼压、青光眼药物治疗次数、平均偏差(MD)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、角膜内皮细胞密度(ECD)和手术并发症:对 68 名患者的 68 只眼睛进行了分析。初次TLE与SBR之间的中位间隔为2个月。SBR术后三年,QS和CS的总体成功率分别为45.1%和9.6%。TLE前使用的药物较多是导致失败的一个因素(P = 0.02)。22只眼睛(32.4%)接受了额外的青光眼手术,41只眼睛(60.3%)在SBR术后3年内没有接受额外的青光眼手术。SBR 3 年后,眼压中位数从 24.0 mmHg 降至 11.0 mmHg,用药次数从 4 次降至 2 次(P < 0.01)。术后 3 年,MD 保持不变,但 BCVA 和 ECD 有所下降。SBR术后未出现严重并发症:结论:SBR可能是治疗TLE术后早期瘢痕性出血的有效方法,但对于TLE术前已使用过多种青光眼药物的眼睛来说并不成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three-year outcomes of surgical bleb revision with mitomycin C for early scarring bleb after trabeculectomy.

Purpose: To report the 3-year outcomes of surgical bleb revision (SBR) with mitomycin C (MMC) for early scarring bleb after trabeculectomy (TLE).

Study design: Retrospective observational study.

Methods: We included glaucoma patients aged ≧ 18 who underwent SBR with MMC within 6 months of their first TLE at Kobe University Hospital and were followed for at least 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the three-year success rate of SBR. We defined surgical success as: intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction ≧ 20% from baseline and 5 ≦ IOP ≦ 18 mmHg. Failure was defined when the IOP deviated from the criteria, when the eye required additional glaucoma surgery, and when the eye lost light perception. Complete success (CS) was success without glaucoma medications and qualified success (QS) was success with glaucoma medications. The secondary outcome measures included IOP, the number of glaucoma medications, mean deviation (MD), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), and surgical complications.

Results: Sixty-eight eyes of 68 patients were analyzed. The median interval between initial TLE and SBR was 2 months. Overall success rate at three-year after SBR were 45.1% and 9.6% for QS and CS, respectively. A greater number of medications used before TLE was a contributing factor to failure (P = 0.02). 22 eyes (32.4%) underwent additional glaucoma surgery, and 41 eyes (60.3%) were spared from additional glaucoma surgery within 3 years after SBR. The median IOP decreased form 24.0 mmHg to 11.0 mmHg 3 years after SBR, and the number of medications decreased from 4 to 2 (P < 0.01). MD remained unchanged, but BCVA and ECD decreased at 3years postoperatively. There were no serious complications of SBR.

Conclusion: SBR may be an effective treatment option for early scarring blebs after TLE but is unsuccessful in eyes that have used many glaucoma medications prior to TLE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信