2019-2023年波兰牛和猪屠体中产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)的分离和分子特征以及与2014-2018年菌株的比较。

IF 5 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jacek Osek, Kinga Wieczorek
{"title":"2019-2023年波兰牛和猪屠体中产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)的分离和分子特征以及与2014-2018年菌株的比较。","authors":"Jacek Osek, Kinga Wieczorek","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The presence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on bovine and porcine carcasses during 2019-2023 was investigated. A total of 368 bovine and 87 porcine carcasses were tested using the ISO/TS 13136 standard and the STEC isolates were further characterized with whole genomic sequencing (WGS). It was found that 119 (32.3 %) of bovine and 14 (16.1 %) of porcine carcasses were positive for the stx Shiga toxin gene. Further analysis of the stx-positive samples allowed to isolate 32 (26.9 %) bovine and two (14.3 %) porcine STEC, respectively. Bovine isolates were classified into 21 different serotypes with the most prevalent O168:H8 (3 isolates), whereas two porcine STEC belonged to two serotypes that were not identified in bovine strains. Isolates of bovine carcass origin were mainly positive for the stx2 Shiga toxin gene, either alone or in combination with stx1 type (26 of 32; 81.2 % isolates). Two STEC from porcine carcasses were positive for the stx2e variant only. All STEC, irrespective of the origin, were negative for the eae intimin gene. MLST and cgMLST analyses of all strains tested revealed that they were diverse. However, a close molecular relationship between some bovine isolates based on cgMLST schemes was observed. Comparison of the current bovine STEC with those isolated between 2014 and 2018 showed that some of them consisted of the same MLST sequence types. However, based on cgMLST analysis only two cases of three genomes of STEC isolates each (two from period 2019-2023 and one isolated between 2014 and 2018) revealed up to 50 allelic differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":14095,"journal":{"name":"International journal of food microbiology","volume":"428 ","pages":"110983"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolation and molecular characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from bovine and porcine carcasses in Poland during 2019-2023 and comparison with strains from years 2014-2018.\",\"authors\":\"Jacek Osek, Kinga Wieczorek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The presence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on bovine and porcine carcasses during 2019-2023 was investigated. A total of 368 bovine and 87 porcine carcasses were tested using the ISO/TS 13136 standard and the STEC isolates were further characterized with whole genomic sequencing (WGS). It was found that 119 (32.3 %) of bovine and 14 (16.1 %) of porcine carcasses were positive for the stx Shiga toxin gene. Further analysis of the stx-positive samples allowed to isolate 32 (26.9 %) bovine and two (14.3 %) porcine STEC, respectively. Bovine isolates were classified into 21 different serotypes with the most prevalent O168:H8 (3 isolates), whereas two porcine STEC belonged to two serotypes that were not identified in bovine strains. Isolates of bovine carcass origin were mainly positive for the stx2 Shiga toxin gene, either alone or in combination with stx1 type (26 of 32; 81.2 % isolates). Two STEC from porcine carcasses were positive for the stx2e variant only. All STEC, irrespective of the origin, were negative for the eae intimin gene. MLST and cgMLST analyses of all strains tested revealed that they were diverse. However, a close molecular relationship between some bovine isolates based on cgMLST schemes was observed. Comparison of the current bovine STEC with those isolated between 2014 and 2018 showed that some of them consisted of the same MLST sequence types. However, based on cgMLST analysis only two cases of three genomes of STEC isolates each (two from period 2019-2023 and one isolated between 2014 and 2018) revealed up to 50 allelic differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of food microbiology\",\"volume\":\"428 \",\"pages\":\"110983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of food microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110983\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of food microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110983","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

调查了2019-2023年期间牛和猪胴体中产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)的存在情况。采用 ISO/TS 13136 标准对 368 头牛和 87 头猪的胴体进行了检测,并通过全基因组测序(WGS)对 STEC 分离物进行了进一步鉴定。结果发现,119 头牛(32.3%)和 14 头猪(16.1%)胴体的 stx 志贺毒素基因呈阳性。对stx阳性样本进行进一步分析后,分别分离出32头牛(26.9%)和2头猪(14.3%)STEC。牛分离物被分为 21 个不同的血清型,其中以 O168:H8 型最为普遍(3 个分离物),而 2 个猪 STEC 属于牛菌株中未发现的两个血清型。牛胴体来源的分离物主要是stx2志贺毒素基因阳性,无论是单独还是与stx1型结合(32个分离物中的26个;81.2%)。来自猪屠体的两个 STEC 仅对 stx2e 变体呈阳性。所有 STEC(无论来自何地)的 eae intimin 基因均为阴性。对所有检测菌株进行的 MLST 和 cgMLST 分析表明,这些菌株具有多样性。不过,根据 cgMLST 方案,观察到一些牛分离株之间存在密切的分子关系。将目前的牛 STEC 与 2014 年至 2018 年期间分离的牛 STEC 进行比较后发现,其中一些包含相同的 MLST 序列类型。然而,根据 cgMLST 分析,只有两例各三个基因组的 STEC 分离物(两例来自 2019-2023 年期间,一例在 2014 年至 2018 年期间分离)显示出多达 50 个等位基因差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Isolation and molecular characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from bovine and porcine carcasses in Poland during 2019-2023 and comparison with strains from years 2014-2018.

The presence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on bovine and porcine carcasses during 2019-2023 was investigated. A total of 368 bovine and 87 porcine carcasses were tested using the ISO/TS 13136 standard and the STEC isolates were further characterized with whole genomic sequencing (WGS). It was found that 119 (32.3 %) of bovine and 14 (16.1 %) of porcine carcasses were positive for the stx Shiga toxin gene. Further analysis of the stx-positive samples allowed to isolate 32 (26.9 %) bovine and two (14.3 %) porcine STEC, respectively. Bovine isolates were classified into 21 different serotypes with the most prevalent O168:H8 (3 isolates), whereas two porcine STEC belonged to two serotypes that were not identified in bovine strains. Isolates of bovine carcass origin were mainly positive for the stx2 Shiga toxin gene, either alone or in combination with stx1 type (26 of 32; 81.2 % isolates). Two STEC from porcine carcasses were positive for the stx2e variant only. All STEC, irrespective of the origin, were negative for the eae intimin gene. MLST and cgMLST analyses of all strains tested revealed that they were diverse. However, a close molecular relationship between some bovine isolates based on cgMLST schemes was observed. Comparison of the current bovine STEC with those isolated between 2014 and 2018 showed that some of them consisted of the same MLST sequence types. However, based on cgMLST analysis only two cases of three genomes of STEC isolates each (two from period 2019-2023 and one isolated between 2014 and 2018) revealed up to 50 allelic differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of food microbiology
International journal of food microbiology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
322
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Food Microbiology publishes papers dealing with all aspects of food microbiology. Articles must present information that is novel, has high impact and interest, and is of high scientific quality. They should provide scientific or technological advancement in the specific field of interest of the journal and enhance its strong international reputation. Preliminary or confirmatory results as well as contributions not strictly related to food microbiology will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信