应激动态心肌 CT 灌注的预后意义:与 CT-FFR 和 CT 血管造影狭窄的比较--多中心 VALIDITY 试验。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yan Yi, Dong Li, Cheng Xu, Limiao Zou, Xian-Bo Yu, Ming Wang, Gan Sun, Zhang Zhang, Yang Gao, Hui Liu, Bin Lu, Jia-Yin Zhang, Yi-Ning Wang
{"title":"应激动态心肌 CT 灌注的预后意义:与 CT-FFR 和 CT 血管造影狭窄的比较--多中心 VALIDITY 试验。","authors":"Yan Yi, Dong Li, Cheng Xu, Limiao Zou, Xian-Bo Yu, Ming Wang, Gan Sun, Zhang Zhang, Yang Gao, Hui Liu, Bin Lu, Jia-Yin Zhang, Yi-Ning Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11187-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging (CTP) and determine whether it has incremental advantages over coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective multicenter study included patients with suspected coronary artery disease who had undergone coronary CTA and CTP and were followed for 6 years. The endpoint was time-to-first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). MACEs included all-cause mortality, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, late revascularization, and heart failure or aggravated angina symptoms requiring hospitalization. The CTP-derived absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF), relative MBF ratio (r-MBF), and the CTA-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and stenosis were analyzed. The independent predictors, time-to-event distributions and the incremental prognostic value of CTP over CTA-derived parameters were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 226 patients (66.7 ± 11.3 years, 37.6% women) were enrolled with a median follow-up time of 1233 days. Twenty-one patients (9.29%) experienced MACEs and ten patients (4.4%) experienced hard MACEs. The r-MBF was the only independent predictor for MACEs in both all patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82 (0.69-0.97), p = 0.01) and patients available for CTA stenosis (%) and CT-FFR calculation (HR: 0.72 (0.57-0.91), p = 0.006). The incremental prognostic significance of r-MBF over CT-FFR was confirmed after combining with CTA-derived parameters (concordance index: 0.919 vs. 0.811; p < 0.01). Patients with r-MBF < 0.77 were more likely to experience MACEs and have a lower average survival time (1565 vs. 1790 days; p < 0.01) after stent implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CTP-assessed r-MBF was independently correlated with MACEs and provided incremental prognostic significance.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question The prognostic significance of CT perfusion (CTP) lacks sufficient support from clinical research. Findings In this Chinese population, CTP has the strongest prognostic significance, over CT-Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and CTA stenosis in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Clinical relevance Relative myocardial blood flow ratio had the strongest prognostic value and incremental advantages in predicting MACEs beyond CT-FFR and coronary CTA stenosis quantification, as well as advantages in patients with stents, aiding in personalized diagnosis and treatment plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic significance of stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion: comparison with CT-FFR and CT angiography stenosis-the multicenter VALIDITY trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Yi, Dong Li, Cheng Xu, Limiao Zou, Xian-Bo Yu, Ming Wang, Gan Sun, Zhang Zhang, Yang Gao, Hui Liu, Bin Lu, Jia-Yin Zhang, Yi-Ning Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-11187-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging (CTP) and determine whether it has incremental advantages over coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective multicenter study included patients with suspected coronary artery disease who had undergone coronary CTA and CTP and were followed for 6 years. The endpoint was time-to-first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). MACEs included all-cause mortality, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, late revascularization, and heart failure or aggravated angina symptoms requiring hospitalization. The CTP-derived absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF), relative MBF ratio (r-MBF), and the CTA-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and stenosis were analyzed. The independent predictors, time-to-event distributions and the incremental prognostic value of CTP over CTA-derived parameters were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 226 patients (66.7 ± 11.3 years, 37.6% women) were enrolled with a median follow-up time of 1233 days. Twenty-one patients (9.29%) experienced MACEs and ten patients (4.4%) experienced hard MACEs. The r-MBF was the only independent predictor for MACEs in both all patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82 (0.69-0.97), p = 0.01) and patients available for CTA stenosis (%) and CT-FFR calculation (HR: 0.72 (0.57-0.91), p = 0.006). The incremental prognostic significance of r-MBF over CT-FFR was confirmed after combining with CTA-derived parameters (concordance index: 0.919 vs. 0.811; p < 0.01). Patients with r-MBF < 0.77 were more likely to experience MACEs and have a lower average survival time (1565 vs. 1790 days; p < 0.01) after stent implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CTP-assessed r-MBF was independently correlated with MACEs and provided incremental prognostic significance.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question The prognostic significance of CT perfusion (CTP) lacks sufficient support from clinical research. Findings In this Chinese population, CTP has the strongest prognostic significance, over CT-Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and CTA stenosis in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Clinical relevance Relative myocardial blood flow ratio had the strongest prognostic value and incremental advantages in predicting MACEs beyond CT-FFR and coronary CTA stenosis quantification, as well as advantages in patients with stents, aiding in personalized diagnosis and treatment plans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11187-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11187-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨应激动态心肌 CT 灌注成像(CTP)的预后意义,并确定其是否比冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)得出的参数更具优势:这项前瞻性多中心研究纳入了接受冠状动脉 CT 和 CTP 检查并随访 6 年的疑似冠心病患者。研究终点是首次发生重大不良心血管事件(MACE)的时间。MACE包括全因死亡率、心源性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、不稳定型心绞痛、晚期血管再通、心力衰竭或心绞痛症状加重而需要住院治疗。对 CTP 导出的绝对心肌血流(MBF)、相对 MBF 比值(r-MBF)、CTA 导出的分数血流储备(CT-FFR)和狭窄进行了分析。评估了独立的预测因素、时间到事件的分布以及CTP相对于CTA衍生参数的增量预后价值:共有 226 名患者(66.7 ± 11.3 岁,37.6% 为女性)入组,中位随访时间为 1233 天。21名患者(9.29%)发生了MACE,10名患者(4.4%)发生了硬性MACE。在所有患者中,r-MBF 是 MACEs 的唯一独立预测指标(危险比 [HR]:0.82(0.69-0.8)):0.82(0.69-0.97),p = 0.01)和可进行 CTA 狭窄度(%)和 CT-FFR 计算的患者(HR:0.72(0.57-0.91),p = 0.006)。r-MBF相对于CT-FFR的增量预后意义在结合CTA衍生参数后得到了证实(一致性指数:0.919 vs. 0.919):0.919 vs. 0.811; p 结论:CTP评估的r-MBF比CT-FFR具有更高的预后意义:CTP评估的r-MBF与MACEs独立相关,并提供了增量预后意义:问题 CT灌注(CTP)的预后意义缺乏临床研究的充分支持。研究结果 在中国人群中,CTP在预测主要不良心血管事件(MACE)方面的预后意义最强,超过了CT-分数血流储备(FFR)和CTA狭窄。临床意义 相对心肌血流比值在预测MACE方面具有最强的预后价值和增量优势,超过了CT-FFR和冠状动脉CTA狭窄量化,在支架患者中也具有优势,有助于个性化诊断和治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic significance of stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion: comparison with CT-FFR and CT angiography stenosis-the multicenter VALIDITY trial.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging (CTP) and determine whether it has incremental advantages over coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived parameters.

Methods: This prospective multicenter study included patients with suspected coronary artery disease who had undergone coronary CTA and CTP and were followed for 6 years. The endpoint was time-to-first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). MACEs included all-cause mortality, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, late revascularization, and heart failure or aggravated angina symptoms requiring hospitalization. The CTP-derived absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF), relative MBF ratio (r-MBF), and the CTA-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and stenosis were analyzed. The independent predictors, time-to-event distributions and the incremental prognostic value of CTP over CTA-derived parameters were assessed.

Results: A total of 226 patients (66.7 ± 11.3 years, 37.6% women) were enrolled with a median follow-up time of 1233 days. Twenty-one patients (9.29%) experienced MACEs and ten patients (4.4%) experienced hard MACEs. The r-MBF was the only independent predictor for MACEs in both all patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82 (0.69-0.97), p = 0.01) and patients available for CTA stenosis (%) and CT-FFR calculation (HR: 0.72 (0.57-0.91), p = 0.006). The incremental prognostic significance of r-MBF over CT-FFR was confirmed after combining with CTA-derived parameters (concordance index: 0.919 vs. 0.811; p < 0.01). Patients with r-MBF < 0.77 were more likely to experience MACEs and have a lower average survival time (1565 vs. 1790 days; p < 0.01) after stent implantation.

Conclusions: CTP-assessed r-MBF was independently correlated with MACEs and provided incremental prognostic significance.

Key points: Question The prognostic significance of CT perfusion (CTP) lacks sufficient support from clinical research. Findings In this Chinese population, CTP has the strongest prognostic significance, over CT-Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and CTA stenosis in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Clinical relevance Relative myocardial blood flow ratio had the strongest prognostic value and incremental advantages in predicting MACEs beyond CT-FFR and coronary CTA stenosis quantification, as well as advantages in patients with stents, aiding in personalized diagnosis and treatment plans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信