S.E. Cohen , B.W. Storosum , N.C. Vulink , P.P. De Koning , Y. Namavar , J.B. Zantvoord , D. Denys
{"title":"强迫症门诊患者治疗的充分性。","authors":"S.E. Cohen , B.W. Storosum , N.C. Vulink , P.P. De Koning , Y. Namavar , J.B. Zantvoord , D. Denys","doi":"10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine whether patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are adequately treated with pharmacotherapy before referral to a specialized center for OCD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with OCD who were seen for intake at an academic outpatient center in The Netherlands between 2016 and 2023. We collected data on age, gender, illness severity using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, duration of illness, comorbidity and past pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. Following the international treatment guidelines, we calculated percentages of patients treated with one SSRI, two or more SSRIs, clomipramine and/or antipsychotic augmentation treatments. Using multiple regression, we analyzed if patient and illness characteristics influenced the adequacy of treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 673 patients with an average YBOCS score of 27. 76 % had taken at least one SSRI, and 35 % at least two SSRIs before admission. Only 29 % received a high SSRI-dose and 4 % had taken at least two SSRIs in high dose. Clomipramine and antipsychotics augmentation had been taken by less than one-third of patients. Only 3 % of referred patients followed all guideline-recommended treatment steps. Although the vast majority of patients had received some form of psychotherapy, a minority had received exposure and response prevention treatment. Multiple regression showed that illness duration and having received psychotherapy were independent moderators of the adequacy of pharmacological treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with OCD are not being treated adequately according to the pharmacological guidelines. Poor pharmacological treatment may lead to increased duration of illness, suboptimal recovery and unnecessary societal costs. Further research could clarify barriers for patients and caregivers, and facilitate improvement of pharmacological treatment for OCS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10554,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychiatry","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 152546"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adequacy of treatment in outpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder\",\"authors\":\"S.E. Cohen , B.W. Storosum , N.C. Vulink , P.P. De Koning , Y. Namavar , J.B. Zantvoord , D. Denys\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine whether patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are adequately treated with pharmacotherapy before referral to a specialized center for OCD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with OCD who were seen for intake at an academic outpatient center in The Netherlands between 2016 and 2023. We collected data on age, gender, illness severity using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, duration of illness, comorbidity and past pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. Following the international treatment guidelines, we calculated percentages of patients treated with one SSRI, two or more SSRIs, clomipramine and/or antipsychotic augmentation treatments. Using multiple regression, we analyzed if patient and illness characteristics influenced the adequacy of treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 673 patients with an average YBOCS score of 27. 76 % had taken at least one SSRI, and 35 % at least two SSRIs before admission. Only 29 % received a high SSRI-dose and 4 % had taken at least two SSRIs in high dose. Clomipramine and antipsychotics augmentation had been taken by less than one-third of patients. Only 3 % of referred patients followed all guideline-recommended treatment steps. Although the vast majority of patients had received some form of psychotherapy, a minority had received exposure and response prevention treatment. Multiple regression showed that illness duration and having received psychotherapy were independent moderators of the adequacy of pharmacological treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with OCD are not being treated adequately according to the pharmacological guidelines. Poor pharmacological treatment may lead to increased duration of illness, suboptimal recovery and unnecessary societal costs. Further research could clarify barriers for patients and caregivers, and facilitate improvement of pharmacological treatment for OCS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"136 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X2400097X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X2400097X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adequacy of treatment in outpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder
Objective
To examine whether patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are adequately treated with pharmacotherapy before referral to a specialized center for OCD.
Methods
We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with OCD who were seen for intake at an academic outpatient center in The Netherlands between 2016 and 2023. We collected data on age, gender, illness severity using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, duration of illness, comorbidity and past pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. Following the international treatment guidelines, we calculated percentages of patients treated with one SSRI, two or more SSRIs, clomipramine and/or antipsychotic augmentation treatments. Using multiple regression, we analyzed if patient and illness characteristics influenced the adequacy of treatment.
Results
We included 673 patients with an average YBOCS score of 27. 76 % had taken at least one SSRI, and 35 % at least two SSRIs before admission. Only 29 % received a high SSRI-dose and 4 % had taken at least two SSRIs in high dose. Clomipramine and antipsychotics augmentation had been taken by less than one-third of patients. Only 3 % of referred patients followed all guideline-recommended treatment steps. Although the vast majority of patients had received some form of psychotherapy, a minority had received exposure and response prevention treatment. Multiple regression showed that illness duration and having received psychotherapy were independent moderators of the adequacy of pharmacological treatment.
Conclusion
Patients with OCD are not being treated adequately according to the pharmacological guidelines. Poor pharmacological treatment may lead to increased duration of illness, suboptimal recovery and unnecessary societal costs. Further research could clarify barriers for patients and caregivers, and facilitate improvement of pharmacological treatment for OCS.
期刊介绍:
"Comprehensive Psychiatry" is an open access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the field of psychiatry and mental health. Its primary mission is to share the latest advancements in knowledge to enhance patient care and deepen the understanding of mental illnesses. The journal is supported by a diverse team of international editors and peer reviewers, ensuring the publication of high-quality research with a strong focus on clinical relevance and the implications for psychopathology.
"Comprehensive Psychiatry" encourages authors to present their research in an accessible manner, facilitating engagement with clinicians, policymakers, and the broader public. By embracing an open access policy, the journal aims to maximize the global impact of its content, making it readily available to a wide audience and fostering scientific collaboration and public awareness beyond the traditional academic community. This approach is designed to promote a more inclusive and informed dialogue on mental health, contributing to the overall progress in the field.