在有限采样策略中利用机器学习高效估算药代动力学分析中的曲线下面积:综述。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Abdullah Alsultan, Abdullah Aljutayli, Abdulrhman Aljouie, Ahmed Albassam, Jean-Baptiste Woillard
{"title":"在有限采样策略中利用机器学习高效估算药代动力学分析中的曲线下面积:综述。","authors":"Abdullah Alsultan, Abdullah Aljutayli, Abdulrhman Aljouie, Ahmed Albassam, Jean-Baptiste Woillard","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03780-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited sampling strategies are widely employed in clinical practice to minimize the number of blood samples required for the accurate area under the curve calculations, as obtaining these samples can be costly and challenging. Traditionally, the maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation has been the standard method for the area under the curve estimation based on limited samples. However, machine learning is emerging as a promising alternative for this purpose. Here, we review studies that utilize machine learning approaches to develop limited sampling strategies and compare the strengths and weaknesses of these machine learning methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the literature for studies that used machine learning to estimate the area under the curve using a limited sampling strategy approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified ten studies that developed machine learning models to estimate the area under the curve for six different drugs. Several of these models demonstrated good accuracy and precision in area under the curve estimation in reference to the traditional Bayesian approach, highlighting the potential of machine learning models in precision dosing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite these promising early results, the development of machine learning for limited sampling strategies is still in its early stages. Further research might be needed to validate machine learning models with larger, high-quality clinical datasets to ensure their reliability and applicability in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"183-201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging machine learning in limited sampling strategies for efficient estimation of the area under the curve in pharmacokinetic analysis: a review.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Alsultan, Abdullah Aljutayli, Abdulrhman Aljouie, Ahmed Albassam, Jean-Baptiste Woillard\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00228-024-03780-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited sampling strategies are widely employed in clinical practice to minimize the number of blood samples required for the accurate area under the curve calculations, as obtaining these samples can be costly and challenging. Traditionally, the maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation has been the standard method for the area under the curve estimation based on limited samples. However, machine learning is emerging as a promising alternative for this purpose. Here, we review studies that utilize machine learning approaches to develop limited sampling strategies and compare the strengths and weaknesses of these machine learning methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the literature for studies that used machine learning to estimate the area under the curve using a limited sampling strategy approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified ten studies that developed machine learning models to estimate the area under the curve for six different drugs. Several of these models demonstrated good accuracy and precision in area under the curve estimation in reference to the traditional Bayesian approach, highlighting the potential of machine learning models in precision dosing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite these promising early results, the development of machine learning for limited sampling strategies is still in its early stages. Further research might be needed to validate machine learning models with larger, high-quality clinical datasets to ensure their reliability and applicability in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"183-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-024-03780-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-024-03780-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:临床实践中广泛采用有限采样策略,以尽量减少准确计算曲线下面积所需的血样数量,因为获取这些血样既昂贵又具有挑战性。传统上,最大后验贝叶斯估计法是基于有限样本估计曲线下面积的标准方法。然而,机器学习正在成为一种有前途的替代方法。在此,我们回顾了利用机器学习方法制定有限采样策略的研究,并比较了这些机器学习方法的优缺点:我们在文献中搜索了使用机器学习方法估算有限抽样策略曲线下面积的研究:结果:我们发现有十项研究开发了机器学习模型来估算六种不同药物的曲线下面积。与传统的贝叶斯方法相比,其中一些模型在曲线下面积估算方面表现出了良好的准确性和精确性,凸显了机器学习模型在精确用药方面的潜力:尽管取得了这些令人鼓舞的早期成果,但针对有限采样策略的机器学习的发展仍处于早期阶段。可能还需要进一步研究,用更大规模、高质量的临床数据集来验证机器学习模型,以确保其在临床环境中的可靠性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging machine learning in limited sampling strategies for efficient estimation of the area under the curve in pharmacokinetic analysis: a review.

Objective: Limited sampling strategies are widely employed in clinical practice to minimize the number of blood samples required for the accurate area under the curve calculations, as obtaining these samples can be costly and challenging. Traditionally, the maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation has been the standard method for the area under the curve estimation based on limited samples. However, machine learning is emerging as a promising alternative for this purpose. Here, we review studies that utilize machine learning approaches to develop limited sampling strategies and compare the strengths and weaknesses of these machine learning methods.

Methods: We searched the literature for studies that used machine learning to estimate the area under the curve using a limited sampling strategy approach.

Results: We identified ten studies that developed machine learning models to estimate the area under the curve for six different drugs. Several of these models demonstrated good accuracy and precision in area under the curve estimation in reference to the traditional Bayesian approach, highlighting the potential of machine learning models in precision dosing.

Conclusions: Despite these promising early results, the development of machine learning for limited sampling strategies is still in its early stages. Further research might be needed to validate machine learning models with larger, high-quality clinical datasets to ensure their reliability and applicability in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed. Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor. Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves -a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or -methods that are original in some basic sense, or -a highly unexpected outcome, or -conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信