Ethan S. Wagner BS , Jeffrey Gaca MD , Donald D. Hegland MD , Lynne Koweek MD , Robert K. Lewis MD, PhD , Sean D. Pokorney MD , Adam Williams MD , Jonathan P. Piccini MD, MHS, FHRS
{"title":"取铅过程中与肋锁关节介入相关的成像结果。","authors":"Ethan S. Wagner BS , Jeffrey Gaca MD , Donald D. Hegland MD , Lynne Koweek MD , Robert K. Lewis MD, PhD , Sean D. Pokorney MD , Adam Williams MD , Jonathan P. Piccini MD, MHS, FHRS","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Binding sites in the costoclavicular space are commonly encountered during transvenous lead extraction. Severe adhesions may warrant use of more aggressive rotational cutting tools or surgical intervention. It is not known whether preprocedural multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can provide information about the likelihood that a patient will require costoclavicular intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are preprocedural MDCT findings associated with need for intervention in the costoclavicular space during lead extraction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent lead extraction and required use of stiffer rotational cutting tools (TightRail Sub-C) or surgical intervention in the costoclavicular space as well as age- and sex-matched controls who did not require intervention were included. Preprocedural MDCT was evaluated for patterns of lead tethering to bone and adjacent calcification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 56 patients were included (n = 20 Sub-C only, n = 8 surgical intervention, and n = 28 matched controls). The mean patient age of interventional cases was 65.0 ± 14.7 years, 18% were female, and the mean lead age was 12.3 ± 6.2 years. Four major patterns were identified on imaging: lead surrounded 360° by fat (intervention rate, 5/24 patients); lead tethered to bone by <180° (11/19); no tethering of lead but with associated calcifications (3/4); and lead tethered to bone by >180° (9/9). Tethering of at least 1 lead to bone by >180° was associated with a 100% rate of costoclavicular intervention and the highest rate of surgical intervention (56%). Absence of any degree of bone tethering was associated with a 0% rate of surgical intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Computed tomography captures details of costoclavicular binding that appear to correlate with the need for adjunctive extraction techniques, including surgical intervention. Computed tomography may be useful in preprocedural planning for adhesions in the costoclavicular space.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 7","pages":"Pages 1800-1809"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imaging findings associated with costoclavicular intervention during lead extraction\",\"authors\":\"Ethan S. Wagner BS , Jeffrey Gaca MD , Donald D. Hegland MD , Lynne Koweek MD , Robert K. Lewis MD, PhD , Sean D. Pokorney MD , Adam Williams MD , Jonathan P. Piccini MD, MHS, FHRS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Binding sites in the costoclavicular space are commonly encountered during transvenous lead extraction. Severe adhesions may warrant use of more aggressive rotational cutting tools or surgical intervention. It is not known whether preprocedural multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can provide information about the likelihood that a patient will require costoclavicular intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are preprocedural MDCT findings associated with need for intervention in the costoclavicular space during lead extraction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent lead extraction and required use of stiffer rotational cutting tools (TightRail Sub-C) or surgical intervention in the costoclavicular space as well as age- and sex-matched controls who did not require intervention were included. Preprocedural MDCT was evaluated for patterns of lead tethering to bone and adjacent calcification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 56 patients were included (n = 20 Sub-C only, n = 8 surgical intervention, and n = 28 matched controls). The mean patient age of interventional cases was 65.0 ± 14.7 years, 18% were female, and the mean lead age was 12.3 ± 6.2 years. Four major patterns were identified on imaging: lead surrounded 360° by fat (intervention rate, 5/24 patients); lead tethered to bone by <180° (11/19); no tethering of lead but with associated calcifications (3/4); and lead tethered to bone by >180° (9/9). Tethering of at least 1 lead to bone by >180° was associated with a 100% rate of costoclavicular intervention and the highest rate of surgical intervention (56%). Absence of any degree of bone tethering was associated with a 0% rate of surgical intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Computed tomography captures details of costoclavicular binding that appear to correlate with the need for adjunctive extraction techniques, including surgical intervention. Computed tomography may be useful in preprocedural planning for adhesions in the costoclavicular space.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":\"22 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1800-1809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124035197\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124035197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Imaging findings associated with costoclavicular intervention during lead extraction
Background
Binding sites in the costoclavicular space are commonly encountered during transvenous lead extraction. Severe adhesions may warrant use of more aggressive rotational cutting tools or surgical intervention. It is not known whether preprocedural multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can provide information about the likelihood that a patient will require costoclavicular intervention.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are preprocedural MDCT findings associated with need for intervention in the costoclavicular space during lead extraction.
Methods
Patients who underwent lead extraction and required use of stiffer rotational cutting tools (TightRail Sub-C) or surgical intervention in the costoclavicular space as well as age- and sex-matched controls who did not require intervention were included. Preprocedural MDCT was evaluated for patterns of lead tethering to bone and adjacent calcification.
Results
Overall, 56 patients were included (n = 20 Sub-C only, n = 8 surgical intervention, and n = 28 matched controls). The mean patient age of interventional cases was 65.0 ± 14.7 years, 18% were female, and the mean lead age was 12.3 ± 6.2 years. Four major patterns were identified on imaging: lead surrounded 360° by fat (intervention rate, 5/24 patients); lead tethered to bone by <180° (11/19); no tethering of lead but with associated calcifications (3/4); and lead tethered to bone by >180° (9/9). Tethering of at least 1 lead to bone by >180° was associated with a 100% rate of costoclavicular intervention and the highest rate of surgical intervention (56%). Absence of any degree of bone tethering was associated with a 0% rate of surgical intervention.
Conclusion
Computed tomography captures details of costoclavicular binding that appear to correlate with the need for adjunctive extraction techniques, including surgical intervention. Computed tomography may be useful in preprocedural planning for adhesions in the costoclavicular space.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.