患有脂肪性水肿的女性在低碳水化合物和低脂肪低能量饮食后的胃肠激素和食欲主观评价--随机对照试验。

IF 2.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Julianne Lundanes, Gunnhild Eggen Storliløkken, Marte Siwsdotter Solem, Simon N Dankel, Randi J Tangvik, Rønnaug Ødegård, Jens Juul Holst, Jens Frederik Rehfeld, Catia Martins, Siren Nymo
{"title":"患有脂肪性水肿的女性在低碳水化合物和低脂肪低能量饮食后的胃肠激素和食欲主观评价--随机对照试验。","authors":"Julianne Lundanes, Gunnhild Eggen Storliløkken, Marte Siwsdotter Solem, Simon N Dankel, Randi J Tangvik, Rønnaug Ødegård, Jens Juul Holst, Jens Frederik Rehfeld, Catia Martins, Siren Nymo","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.11.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ketosis seems to attenuate, or prevent, the rise in both ghrelin concentrations and subjective hunger ratings that follow weight loss. However, most of the previous studies have employed very-low energy diets (VLED) and are therefore limited in terms of generalizability.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare changes in ghrelin plasma concentrations after a low-carbohydrate (LCD) versus an isocaloric low-fat low energy diet (LED) in females with lipedema. Secondary objectives were to determine potential differences between diets in changes in satiety hormones, and subjective ratings of appetite.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Females with obesity and lipedema were randomized to either an LCD (75g carbohydrates) or low-fat diet (180g carbohydrates) for 8 weeks. Plasma concentrations of ghrelin, peptide YY, cholecystokinin (CCK), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and subjective ratings of appetite were measured in the fasting and postprandial states, pre and post intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>55 females (30 in LCD) were included (age 47.9±11.3 years, BMI 36.8±5.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Both LCD and low-fat groups lost weight (10.3%, P<0.001 and 7.3%, P<0.001, respectively), but the LCD lost significantly more. No within or between groups differences were found for ghrelin in the fasting state. A reduction in postprandial (tAUC) ghrelin was seen only in the LCD group (P=0.002), and this change was significantly different from the low-fat group (P=0.046). The LCD group also reported an increase in postprandial (both iAUC and tAUC) fullness ratings (P=0.035 and P=0.005, respectively), but this was not significantly different from the low-fat group (P=0.703 and P=0.365, respectively), despite the latter experiencing no change (P=0.127 and P=0.152, respectively). Conversely, only the low-fat group reported increased hunger in fasting (P=0.046), but changes were not significantly different from the LCD group (P=0.711). A decrease in postprandial (both tAUC and iAUC) CCK was observed in both LCD and low-fat diet groups (P≤0.005 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite no changes in fasting ghrelin concentrations in either of the diet groups, a reduction in postprandial ghrelin and increased fullness was seen in the LCD group. These favorable changes in appetite in the LCD group might have contributed to the greater weight loss observed in this group.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT04632810, Effect of Ketosis on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Lipedema (Lipodiet).</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastrointestinal hormones and subjective ratings of appetite after low-carbohydrate vs low-fat low-energy diets in females with lipedema - a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Julianne Lundanes, Gunnhild Eggen Storliløkken, Marte Siwsdotter Solem, Simon N Dankel, Randi J Tangvik, Rønnaug Ødegård, Jens Juul Holst, Jens Frederik Rehfeld, Catia Martins, Siren Nymo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.11.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ketosis seems to attenuate, or prevent, the rise in both ghrelin concentrations and subjective hunger ratings that follow weight loss. However, most of the previous studies have employed very-low energy diets (VLED) and are therefore limited in terms of generalizability.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare changes in ghrelin plasma concentrations after a low-carbohydrate (LCD) versus an isocaloric low-fat low energy diet (LED) in females with lipedema. Secondary objectives were to determine potential differences between diets in changes in satiety hormones, and subjective ratings of appetite.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Females with obesity and lipedema were randomized to either an LCD (75g carbohydrates) or low-fat diet (180g carbohydrates) for 8 weeks. Plasma concentrations of ghrelin, peptide YY, cholecystokinin (CCK), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and subjective ratings of appetite were measured in the fasting and postprandial states, pre and post intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>55 females (30 in LCD) were included (age 47.9±11.3 years, BMI 36.8±5.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Both LCD and low-fat groups lost weight (10.3%, P<0.001 and 7.3%, P<0.001, respectively), but the LCD lost significantly more. No within or between groups differences were found for ghrelin in the fasting state. A reduction in postprandial (tAUC) ghrelin was seen only in the LCD group (P=0.002), and this change was significantly different from the low-fat group (P=0.046). The LCD group also reported an increase in postprandial (both iAUC and tAUC) fullness ratings (P=0.035 and P=0.005, respectively), but this was not significantly different from the low-fat group (P=0.703 and P=0.365, respectively), despite the latter experiencing no change (P=0.127 and P=0.152, respectively). Conversely, only the low-fat group reported increased hunger in fasting (P=0.046), but changes were not significantly different from the LCD group (P=0.711). A decrease in postprandial (both tAUC and iAUC) CCK was observed in both LCD and low-fat diet groups (P≤0.005 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite no changes in fasting ghrelin concentrations in either of the diet groups, a reduction in postprandial ghrelin and increased fullness was seen in the LCD group. These favorable changes in appetite in the LCD group might have contributed to the greater weight loss observed in this group.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT04632810, Effect of Ketosis on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Lipedema (Lipodiet).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nutrition ESPEN\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nutrition ESPEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.11.018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.11.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:酮病似乎可以减轻或防止减肥后胃泌素浓度和主观饥饿感的上升。然而,之前的大多数研究都采用了极低能量饮食(VLED),因此在推广性方面受到了限制:目的:比较患有脂肪性水肿的女性在接受低碳水化合物饮食(LCD)和等热量低脂肪低能量饮食(LED)后胃泌素血浆浓度的变化。次要目标是确定不同饮食在饱腹感激素变化和食欲主观评价方面的潜在差异:方法:患有肥胖症和脂肪性水肿的女性被随机分配到低能量饮食(75 克碳水化合物)或低脂肪饮食(180 克碳水化合物)中,为期 8 周。在空腹和餐后状态、干预前和干预后测量血浆中胃泌素、肽YY、胆囊收缩素(CCK)和胰高血糖素样肽1(GLP-1)的浓度以及对食欲的主观评价:共纳入 55 名女性(LCD 组 30 人)(年龄 47.9±11.3 岁,体重指数 36.8±5.1 kg/m2)。LCD组和低脂肪组的体重都有所下降(10.3%,PC组):尽管两个饮食组的空腹胃泌素浓度均无变化,但 LCD 组的餐后胃泌素降低,饱腹感增加。LCD组食欲的这些有利变化可能是该组体重下降幅度更大的原因:NCT04632810,酮病对脂肪性水肿患者疼痛和生活质量的影响(Lipodiet)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gastrointestinal hormones and subjective ratings of appetite after low-carbohydrate vs low-fat low-energy diets in females with lipedema - a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Ketosis seems to attenuate, or prevent, the rise in both ghrelin concentrations and subjective hunger ratings that follow weight loss. However, most of the previous studies have employed very-low energy diets (VLED) and are therefore limited in terms of generalizability.

Objectives: To compare changes in ghrelin plasma concentrations after a low-carbohydrate (LCD) versus an isocaloric low-fat low energy diet (LED) in females with lipedema. Secondary objectives were to determine potential differences between diets in changes in satiety hormones, and subjective ratings of appetite.

Methods: Females with obesity and lipedema were randomized to either an LCD (75g carbohydrates) or low-fat diet (180g carbohydrates) for 8 weeks. Plasma concentrations of ghrelin, peptide YY, cholecystokinin (CCK), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and subjective ratings of appetite were measured in the fasting and postprandial states, pre and post intervention.

Results: 55 females (30 in LCD) were included (age 47.9±11.3 years, BMI 36.8±5.1 kg/m2). Both LCD and low-fat groups lost weight (10.3%, P<0.001 and 7.3%, P<0.001, respectively), but the LCD lost significantly more. No within or between groups differences were found for ghrelin in the fasting state. A reduction in postprandial (tAUC) ghrelin was seen only in the LCD group (P=0.002), and this change was significantly different from the low-fat group (P=0.046). The LCD group also reported an increase in postprandial (both iAUC and tAUC) fullness ratings (P=0.035 and P=0.005, respectively), but this was not significantly different from the low-fat group (P=0.703 and P=0.365, respectively), despite the latter experiencing no change (P=0.127 and P=0.152, respectively). Conversely, only the low-fat group reported increased hunger in fasting (P=0.046), but changes were not significantly different from the LCD group (P=0.711). A decrease in postprandial (both tAUC and iAUC) CCK was observed in both LCD and low-fat diet groups (P≤0.005 for all).

Conclusion: Despite no changes in fasting ghrelin concentrations in either of the diet groups, a reduction in postprandial ghrelin and increased fullness was seen in the LCD group. These favorable changes in appetite in the LCD group might have contributed to the greater weight loss observed in this group.

Clinical trial registration: NCT04632810, Effect of Ketosis on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Lipedema (Lipodiet).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
Clinical nutrition ESPEN NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
512
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信