Ana Paula Silva Champs, Thayse Nayara Freitas do Vale Santanna, Christian Marques Couto, Roberta Correa Macedo, Patricia Sola Penna, Luciana Charchar Vilas Boas Cruz, Rafael Xavier da Silva-Neto, Luiz Sérgio Vaz
{"title":"根据巴西葡萄牙语验证昏迷恢复量表修订版。","authors":"Ana Paula Silva Champs, Thayse Nayara Freitas do Vale Santanna, Christian Marques Couto, Roberta Correa Macedo, Patricia Sola Penna, Luciana Charchar Vilas Boas Cruz, Rafael Xavier da Silva-Neto, Luiz Sérgio Vaz","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> To improve the diagnostic accuracy of the state of consciousness of patients with severe brain injury, Giacino et al. introduced the Coma Recovery Scale (CRS) in 1991, which underwent revision in 2004, resulting in the revised CRS scale (CRS-R).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To determine the concurrent validity, as well as inter- and intrarater agreement of the CRS-R's adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This study involved a sample of 30 patients with severe brain injury. Concurrent evaluations were also performed with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) scale. A total of seven rehabilitation experts were recruited to assess the inter- and intrarater reliability agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Interrater reliability was moderate to high for auditory, visual, motor, verbal, communication, and arousal subscales (Cohen weighted kappa = 0.765 to 0.892; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Significant inter and intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients were observed for the total CRS-R scores, all of which were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Also, total CRS-R scores exhibited a high correlation with the total GCS and FOUR scores, indicating acceptable concurrent validity (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The Brazilian Portuguese version of CRS-R can be reliably administered by trained examiners. This study demonstrated substantial to almost perfect interrater agreement for the total score and subscales, as well as high concurrent validity between the Brazilian Portuguese version of CRS-R and the other two standardized behavioral scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"82 11","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation to Brazilian Portuguese of the coma recovery scale-revised.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Paula Silva Champs, Thayse Nayara Freitas do Vale Santanna, Christian Marques Couto, Roberta Correa Macedo, Patricia Sola Penna, Luciana Charchar Vilas Boas Cruz, Rafael Xavier da Silva-Neto, Luiz Sérgio Vaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1791657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> To improve the diagnostic accuracy of the state of consciousness of patients with severe brain injury, Giacino et al. introduced the Coma Recovery Scale (CRS) in 1991, which underwent revision in 2004, resulting in the revised CRS scale (CRS-R).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To determine the concurrent validity, as well as inter- and intrarater agreement of the CRS-R's adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This study involved a sample of 30 patients with severe brain injury. Concurrent evaluations were also performed with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) scale. A total of seven rehabilitation experts were recruited to assess the inter- and intrarater reliability agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Interrater reliability was moderate to high for auditory, visual, motor, verbal, communication, and arousal subscales (Cohen weighted kappa = 0.765 to 0.892; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Significant inter and intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients were observed for the total CRS-R scores, all of which were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Also, total CRS-R scores exhibited a high correlation with the total GCS and FOUR scores, indicating acceptable concurrent validity (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The Brazilian Portuguese version of CRS-R can be reliably administered by trained examiners. This study demonstrated substantial to almost perfect interrater agreement for the total score and subscales, as well as high concurrent validity between the Brazilian Portuguese version of CRS-R and the other two standardized behavioral scales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\"82 11\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578665/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791657\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation to Brazilian Portuguese of the coma recovery scale-revised.
Background: To improve the diagnostic accuracy of the state of consciousness of patients with severe brain injury, Giacino et al. introduced the Coma Recovery Scale (CRS) in 1991, which underwent revision in 2004, resulting in the revised CRS scale (CRS-R).
Objective: To determine the concurrent validity, as well as inter- and intrarater agreement of the CRS-R's adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese.
Methods: This study involved a sample of 30 patients with severe brain injury. Concurrent evaluations were also performed with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) scale. A total of seven rehabilitation experts were recruited to assess the inter- and intrarater reliability agreement.
Results: Interrater reliability was moderate to high for auditory, visual, motor, verbal, communication, and arousal subscales (Cohen weighted kappa = 0.765 to 0.892; p < 0.001). Significant inter and intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients were observed for the total CRS-R scores, all of which were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Also, total CRS-R scores exhibited a high correlation with the total GCS and FOUR scores, indicating acceptable concurrent validity (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The Brazilian Portuguese version of CRS-R can be reliably administered by trained examiners. This study demonstrated substantial to almost perfect interrater agreement for the total score and subscales, as well as high concurrent validity between the Brazilian Portuguese version of CRS-R and the other two standardized behavioral scales.
期刊介绍:
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology.
The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.