通过球囊辅助肠镜对克罗恩病小肠狭窄进行内镜扩张:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.20524/aog.2024.0920
Vishali Moond, Vikram Jeet Singh Gill, Sheza Malik, Ameya Kasture, Sandesh Parajuli, Suha Soni, Saurabh Chandan, Arkady Broder, Babu P Mohan, Douglas Adler
{"title":"通过球囊辅助肠镜对克罗恩病小肠狭窄进行内镜扩张:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Vishali Moond, Vikram Jeet Singh Gill, Sheza Malik, Ameya Kasture, Sandesh Parajuli, Suha Soni, Saurabh Chandan, Arkady Broder, Babu P Mohan, Douglas Adler","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) (both single- and double-balloon enteroscopy) has garnered attention in the treatment of small intestine strictures in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate the pooled clinical outcomes of BAE-mediated endoscopic dilation of small intestine strictures in patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases for articles reporting outcomes following BAE for small intestinal strictures in patients with CD. Outcomes studied were pooled technical success, clinical success and adverse events. Standard meta-analysis methods were employed using the random-effects model, and heterogeneity was studied using <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 26 studies, 9 prospective and 17 retrospective, involving 1570 patients. The pooled technical success rate of double-balloon enteroscopy was 87.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.1-91.5; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=53%) and the pooled therapeutic success rate was 69.7% (95%CI 61.6-76.7; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=71%). The pooled major complications per procedure were 5.5% (95%CI 3.5-8.4; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=57%); the risk of bleeding was 2.5% (95%CI 1.4-4.2; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=28%), and the risk of perforation was 2.7% (95%CI 1.6-4.5; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=3%). The pooled rate of recurrence after the first dilation was 42.3% (95%CI 16.9-72.5; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=59%), and the rate of repeat endoscopic balloon dilation was 23.9% (95%CI 14.1%-37.5%; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=85%), while the pooled rate of repeat surgery was 25.3% (95%CI 11.8%-46.0%; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=44%].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BAE is a good first line approach for patients with CD-induced strictures in an attempt to treat symptoms and potentially avoid surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 6","pages":"682-694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic dilation of small-intestine strictures in Crohn's disease by balloon-assisted enteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Vishali Moond, Vikram Jeet Singh Gill, Sheza Malik, Ameya Kasture, Sandesh Parajuli, Suha Soni, Saurabh Chandan, Arkady Broder, Babu P Mohan, Douglas Adler\",\"doi\":\"10.20524/aog.2024.0920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) (both single- and double-balloon enteroscopy) has garnered attention in the treatment of small intestine strictures in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate the pooled clinical outcomes of BAE-mediated endoscopic dilation of small intestine strictures in patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases for articles reporting outcomes following BAE for small intestinal strictures in patients with CD. Outcomes studied were pooled technical success, clinical success and adverse events. Standard meta-analysis methods were employed using the random-effects model, and heterogeneity was studied using <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 26 studies, 9 prospective and 17 retrospective, involving 1570 patients. The pooled technical success rate of double-balloon enteroscopy was 87.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.1-91.5; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=53%) and the pooled therapeutic success rate was 69.7% (95%CI 61.6-76.7; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=71%). The pooled major complications per procedure were 5.5% (95%CI 3.5-8.4; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=57%); the risk of bleeding was 2.5% (95%CI 1.4-4.2; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=28%), and the risk of perforation was 2.7% (95%CI 1.6-4.5; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=3%). The pooled rate of recurrence after the first dilation was 42.3% (95%CI 16.9-72.5; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=59%), and the rate of repeat endoscopic balloon dilation was 23.9% (95%CI 14.1%-37.5%; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=85%), while the pooled rate of repeat surgery was 25.3% (95%CI 11.8%-46.0%; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>=44%].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BAE is a good first line approach for patients with CD-induced strictures in an attempt to treat symptoms and potentially avoid surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"37 6\",\"pages\":\"682-694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574157/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:球囊辅助肠镜(BAE)(包括单球囊和双球囊肠镜)在治疗克罗恩病(CD)患者小肠狭窄方面备受关注。本研究旨在评估以 BAE 为介导的内镜下扩张 CD 患者小肠狭窄的临床疗效:我们在多个数据库中搜索了报道 CD 患者 BAE 治疗小肠狭窄疗效的文章。研究结果包括技术成功率、临床成功率和不良事件。我们使用随机效应模型进行了标准的荟萃分析,并使用I 2统计量对异质性进行了研究:我们分析了 26 项研究,其中 9 项是前瞻性研究,17 项是回顾性研究,涉及 1570 名患者。双气囊肠镜的汇总技术成功率为 87.6%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 82.1-91.5;I 2=53%),汇总治疗成功率为 69.7%(95%CI 61.6-76.7;I 2=71%)。每次手术的汇总主要并发症为5.5%(95%CI 3.5-8.4;I 2=57%);出血风险为2.5%(95%CI 1.4-4.2;I 2=28%),穿孔风险为2.7%(95%CI 1.6-4.5;I 2=3%)。首次扩张后的复发率为42.3% (95%CI 16.9-72.5;I 2=59%),重复内镜球囊扩张的比率为23.9% (95%CI 14.1%-37.5%; I 2=85%),而重复手术的比率为25.3% (95%CI 11.8%-46.0%; I 2=44%]:对于 CD 引起的狭窄患者,BAE 是一种很好的一线治疗方法,可治疗症状并有可能避免手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic dilation of small-intestine strictures in Crohn's disease by balloon-assisted enteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) (both single- and double-balloon enteroscopy) has garnered attention in the treatment of small intestine strictures in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate the pooled clinical outcomes of BAE-mediated endoscopic dilation of small intestine strictures in patients with CD.

Methods: We searched multiple databases for articles reporting outcomes following BAE for small intestinal strictures in patients with CD. Outcomes studied were pooled technical success, clinical success and adverse events. Standard meta-analysis methods were employed using the random-effects model, and heterogeneity was studied using I 2 statistics.

Results: We analyzed 26 studies, 9 prospective and 17 retrospective, involving 1570 patients. The pooled technical success rate of double-balloon enteroscopy was 87.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.1-91.5; I 2=53%) and the pooled therapeutic success rate was 69.7% (95%CI 61.6-76.7; I 2=71%). The pooled major complications per procedure were 5.5% (95%CI 3.5-8.4; I 2=57%); the risk of bleeding was 2.5% (95%CI 1.4-4.2; I 2=28%), and the risk of perforation was 2.7% (95%CI 1.6-4.5; I 2=3%). The pooled rate of recurrence after the first dilation was 42.3% (95%CI 16.9-72.5; I 2=59%), and the rate of repeat endoscopic balloon dilation was 23.9% (95%CI 14.1%-37.5%; I 2=85%), while the pooled rate of repeat surgery was 25.3% (95%CI 11.8%-46.0%; I 2=44%].

Conclusion: BAE is a good first line approach for patients with CD-induced strictures in an attempt to treat symptoms and potentially avoid surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信