下颌骨成角骨折内固定植入物的低成本钛-钼-铁(TMF8)替代品的性能评估:有限元分析研究

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Anirudh Venkatraman Krishnan, Nitin Mathusoothanaperumal Sukanya, Tabishur Rahman, Mohamed A. H. Gepreel
{"title":"下颌骨成角骨折内固定植入物的低成本钛-钼-铁(TMF8)替代品的性能评估:有限元分析研究","authors":"Anirudh Venkatraman Krishnan,&nbsp;Nitin Mathusoothanaperumal Sukanya,&nbsp;Tabishur Rahman,&nbsp;Mohamed A. H. Gepreel","doi":"10.1007/s10856-024-06842-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stainless steel and titanium-based alloys have been the gold standard when it comes to permanent implants and magnesium-based alloys have been the best option for bioresorbable alloys. Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-64, with its 110 GPa Young’s Modulus is the most commonly employed alloy to manufacture biomedical implants used for treatment of fractures of skeleton. Recently, researchers have developed a new low-cost and toxic Vanadium-free alternative to this alloy, Ti-3Mo-0.5Fe at.%, namely TMF8. This alloy has a 25% lesser Young’s Modulus compared to Ti-6Al-4V and also demonstrated acceptable mechanical properties while possessing better cell proliferation results. The lower Young’s Modulus can aid in lowering stress shielding effects while its cytocompatibility could enhance healing. This work, therefore, tries to use finite element analyses to compare these two alloys (Ti-64 and TMF8) from a practical structural point of view to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of this new alloy and how a low-cost biocompatible alternative (TMF8) can actually prove to be a more viable option. The analyses confirm that TMF8 shows almost similar biomechanics performance to Ti-64 alloy (and in acceptable range) in bone plate fixation of mandibular angular fracture treatment.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10856-024-06842-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of a low-cost Ti-Mo-Fe (TMF8) as a replacement for Ti-6Al-4V for internal fixation implants used in mandibular angular fractures: a finite element analysis study\",\"authors\":\"Anirudh Venkatraman Krishnan,&nbsp;Nitin Mathusoothanaperumal Sukanya,&nbsp;Tabishur Rahman,&nbsp;Mohamed A. H. Gepreel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10856-024-06842-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Stainless steel and titanium-based alloys have been the gold standard when it comes to permanent implants and magnesium-based alloys have been the best option for bioresorbable alloys. Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-64, with its 110 GPa Young’s Modulus is the most commonly employed alloy to manufacture biomedical implants used for treatment of fractures of skeleton. Recently, researchers have developed a new low-cost and toxic Vanadium-free alternative to this alloy, Ti-3Mo-0.5Fe at.%, namely TMF8. This alloy has a 25% lesser Young’s Modulus compared to Ti-6Al-4V and also demonstrated acceptable mechanical properties while possessing better cell proliferation results. The lower Young’s Modulus can aid in lowering stress shielding effects while its cytocompatibility could enhance healing. This work, therefore, tries to use finite element analyses to compare these two alloys (Ti-64 and TMF8) from a practical structural point of view to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of this new alloy and how a low-cost biocompatible alternative (TMF8) can actually prove to be a more viable option. The analyses confirm that TMF8 shows almost similar biomechanics performance to Ti-64 alloy (and in acceptable range) in bone plate fixation of mandibular angular fracture treatment.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10856-024-06842-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10856-024-06842-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10856-024-06842-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不锈钢和钛基合金一直是永久性植入物的黄金标准,而镁基合金则是生物可吸收合金的最佳选择。钛-6Al-4V(Ti-64)的杨氏模量为 110 GPa,是制造用于治疗骨骼骨折的生物医学植入物最常用的合金。最近,研究人员开发出了一种新的低成本、无毒的钒合金替代品--Ti-3Mo-0.5Fe at.%,即 TMF8。与 Ti-6Al-4V 相比,这种合金的杨氏模量降低了 25%,同时还具有可接受的机械性能和更好的细胞增殖效果。较低的杨氏模量有助于降低应力屏蔽效应,而其细胞相容性则能促进愈合。因此,这项研究试图利用有限元分析,从实际结构的角度对这两种合金(Ti-64 和 TMF8)进行比较,分析这种新型合金的优缺点,以及低成本的生物相容性替代品(TMF8)如何成为更可行的选择。分析结果证实,在下颌角骨折的骨板固定治疗中,TMF8 的生物力学性能几乎与 Ti-64 合金相似(且在可接受的范围内)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of a low-cost Ti-Mo-Fe (TMF8) as a replacement for Ti-6Al-4V for internal fixation implants used in mandibular angular fractures: a finite element analysis study

Stainless steel and titanium-based alloys have been the gold standard when it comes to permanent implants and magnesium-based alloys have been the best option for bioresorbable alloys. Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-64, with its 110 GPa Young’s Modulus is the most commonly employed alloy to manufacture biomedical implants used for treatment of fractures of skeleton. Recently, researchers have developed a new low-cost and toxic Vanadium-free alternative to this alloy, Ti-3Mo-0.5Fe at.%, namely TMF8. This alloy has a 25% lesser Young’s Modulus compared to Ti-6Al-4V and also demonstrated acceptable mechanical properties while possessing better cell proliferation results. The lower Young’s Modulus can aid in lowering stress shielding effects while its cytocompatibility could enhance healing. This work, therefore, tries to use finite element analyses to compare these two alloys (Ti-64 and TMF8) from a practical structural point of view to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of this new alloy and how a low-cost biocompatible alternative (TMF8) can actually prove to be a more viable option. The analyses confirm that TMF8 shows almost similar biomechanics performance to Ti-64 alloy (and in acceptable range) in bone plate fixation of mandibular angular fracture treatment.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine publishes refereed papers providing significant progress in the application of biomaterials and tissue engineering constructs as medical or dental implants, prostheses and devices. Coverage spans a wide range of topics from basic science to clinical applications, around the theme of materials in medicine and dentistry. The central element is the development of synthetic and natural materials used in orthopaedic, maxillofacial, cardiovascular, neurological, ophthalmic and dental applications. Special biomedical topics include biomaterial synthesis and characterisation, biocompatibility studies, nanomedicine, tissue engineering constructs and cell substrates, regenerative medicine, computer modelling and other advanced experimental methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信