采用各种正则化技术的微波成像迭代法性能分析

IF 3.5 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Reihaneh Ahmadi Vanhari;Ahmad Bakhtafrouz;Sima Noghanian
{"title":"采用各种正则化技术的微波成像迭代法性能分析","authors":"Reihaneh Ahmadi Vanhari;Ahmad Bakhtafrouz;Sima Noghanian","doi":"10.1109/OJAP.2024.3468334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantitative microwave imaging (MWI) involves solving the inverse scattering problem (ISP), which is characterized by nonlinearity and ill-posedness. To address the challenges posed by ISP, iterative linearization techniques have been introduced alongside regularization procedures. Born Iterative Method (BIM) and Distorted Born Iterative Method (DBIM) are well-established approaches in the field of microwave imaging. The primary objective of our study was to conduct a comparative analysis to evaluate the performance of traditional regularization techniques such as Truncated Singular Value Decomposition (TSVD), Tikhonov regularization, and the truncated Landweber algorithm with choosing different regularization parameters, within the framework of these established methods. The lack of explicit mention of optimal parameter values and comparison of regularization methods highlights a gap in the existing literature. Investigating and comparing different regularization methods and their corresponding optimal parameter values for different structures and features within the framework of linearization methods can provide valuable insights into effectively solving inverse problems in MWI. Additionally, exploring how different regularization parameters impact the accuracy and stability of the solutions obtained through BIM and DBIM can help researchers and practitioners make informed decisions to choose a regularization method and its corresponding parameter value for a specific problem. Our research aimed to provide a comprehensive baseline that would be beneficial for future studies and practical applications in microwave imaging.","PeriodicalId":34267,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation","volume":"5 6","pages":"1523-1538"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10695748","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis of Iterative Methods in Microwave Imaging With Various Regularization Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Reihaneh Ahmadi Vanhari;Ahmad Bakhtafrouz;Sima Noghanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJAP.2024.3468334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantitative microwave imaging (MWI) involves solving the inverse scattering problem (ISP), which is characterized by nonlinearity and ill-posedness. To address the challenges posed by ISP, iterative linearization techniques have been introduced alongside regularization procedures. Born Iterative Method (BIM) and Distorted Born Iterative Method (DBIM) are well-established approaches in the field of microwave imaging. The primary objective of our study was to conduct a comparative analysis to evaluate the performance of traditional regularization techniques such as Truncated Singular Value Decomposition (TSVD), Tikhonov regularization, and the truncated Landweber algorithm with choosing different regularization parameters, within the framework of these established methods. The lack of explicit mention of optimal parameter values and comparison of regularization methods highlights a gap in the existing literature. Investigating and comparing different regularization methods and their corresponding optimal parameter values for different structures and features within the framework of linearization methods can provide valuable insights into effectively solving inverse problems in MWI. Additionally, exploring how different regularization parameters impact the accuracy and stability of the solutions obtained through BIM and DBIM can help researchers and practitioners make informed decisions to choose a regularization method and its corresponding parameter value for a specific problem. Our research aimed to provide a comprehensive baseline that would be beneficial for future studies and practical applications in microwave imaging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"1523-1538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10695748\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10695748/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10695748/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定量微波成像(MWI)涉及反向散射问题(ISP)的求解,该问题的特点是非线性和难以确定。为了应对 ISP 带来的挑战,除了正则化程序外,还引入了迭代线性化技术。玻恩迭代法(Born Iterative Method,BIM)和扭曲玻恩迭代法(Distorted Born Iterative Method,DBIM)是微波成像领域的成熟方法。我们研究的主要目的是进行比较分析,在这些成熟方法的框架内评估截断奇异值分解(TSVD)、Tikhonov 正则化和截断 Landweber 算法等传统正则化技术的性能,并选择不同的正则化参数。现有文献中没有明确提及最优参数值和正则化方法的比较,这凸显了文献中的空白。在线性化方法的框架内,针对不同的结构和特征,研究和比较不同的正则化方法及其相应的最佳参数值,可以为有效解决多维反演问题提供有价值的见解。此外,探索不同的正则化参数如何影响通过 BIM 和 DBIM 获得的解的准确性和稳定性,有助于研究人员和从业人员做出明智的决策,为特定问题选择正则化方法及其相应的参数值。我们的研究旨在提供一个全面的基线,这将有利于微波成像领域未来的研究和实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Analysis of Iterative Methods in Microwave Imaging With Various Regularization Techniques
Quantitative microwave imaging (MWI) involves solving the inverse scattering problem (ISP), which is characterized by nonlinearity and ill-posedness. To address the challenges posed by ISP, iterative linearization techniques have been introduced alongside regularization procedures. Born Iterative Method (BIM) and Distorted Born Iterative Method (DBIM) are well-established approaches in the field of microwave imaging. The primary objective of our study was to conduct a comparative analysis to evaluate the performance of traditional regularization techniques such as Truncated Singular Value Decomposition (TSVD), Tikhonov regularization, and the truncated Landweber algorithm with choosing different regularization parameters, within the framework of these established methods. The lack of explicit mention of optimal parameter values and comparison of regularization methods highlights a gap in the existing literature. Investigating and comparing different regularization methods and their corresponding optimal parameter values for different structures and features within the framework of linearization methods can provide valuable insights into effectively solving inverse problems in MWI. Additionally, exploring how different regularization parameters impact the accuracy and stability of the solutions obtained through BIM and DBIM can help researchers and practitioners make informed decisions to choose a regularization method and its corresponding parameter value for a specific problem. Our research aimed to provide a comprehensive baseline that would be beneficial for future studies and practical applications in microwave imaging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信