用于评估 Bt 玉米中结构化庇护所的不同鞘翅目昆虫标记和诱捕方法的评估

IF 4.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
G. Cabrera Walsh, Cristian Battagliotti
{"title":"用于评估 Bt 玉米中结构化庇护所的不同鞘翅目昆虫标记和诱捕方法的评估","authors":"G. Cabrera Walsh, Cristian Battagliotti","doi":"10.1007/s10340-024-01840-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The fall armyworm (<i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i>) is an important pest of maize, and a key target of transgenic crops expressing <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> (Bt) insecticidal proteins. These exert a strong selective pressure, so susceptible plants (refuges) are planted together with the transgenic seed to lower such pressure. The system favored in North America is to mix Bt and non-Bt seed (refuge-in-a-bag, or RIB). However, South American farmers favor structured refuges, interplanting rows of Bt and non-Bt seed. Yet, the proportion of susceptible maize must be minimized to prevent yield losses, and flight distance before mating is considered the best way to gauge the adequate distance between non-Bt rows in structured refuges, which has been estimated through mark–release–recapture experiments. The aim of this study was to compare three marking techniques and three trapping systems in laboratory and field experiments. Results suggest conventional marking techniques were not completely innocuous to the moths. UV traps drastically overrode the effect of synthetic and natural pheromones, suggesting they may not reflect normal dispersion behaviors. Marking experiments may not provide reliable measures of flight distance, and although farmers tend to resist the RIB option the data suggests it should be enforced.</p>","PeriodicalId":16736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pest Science","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of different marking and trapping methods for Spodoptera frugiperda used to assess structured refuges in Bt maize\",\"authors\":\"G. Cabrera Walsh, Cristian Battagliotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10340-024-01840-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The fall armyworm (<i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i>) is an important pest of maize, and a key target of transgenic crops expressing <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> (Bt) insecticidal proteins. These exert a strong selective pressure, so susceptible plants (refuges) are planted together with the transgenic seed to lower such pressure. The system favored in North America is to mix Bt and non-Bt seed (refuge-in-a-bag, or RIB). However, South American farmers favor structured refuges, interplanting rows of Bt and non-Bt seed. Yet, the proportion of susceptible maize must be minimized to prevent yield losses, and flight distance before mating is considered the best way to gauge the adequate distance between non-Bt rows in structured refuges, which has been estimated through mark–release–recapture experiments. The aim of this study was to compare three marking techniques and three trapping systems in laboratory and field experiments. Results suggest conventional marking techniques were not completely innocuous to the moths. UV traps drastically overrode the effect of synthetic and natural pheromones, suggesting they may not reflect normal dispersion behaviors. Marking experiments may not provide reliable measures of flight distance, and although farmers tend to resist the RIB option the data suggests it should be enforced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pest Science\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pest Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-024-01840-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pest Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-024-01840-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

秋绵虫(Spodoptera frugiperda)是玉米的重要害虫,也是表达苏云金芽孢杆菌(Bt)杀虫蛋白的转基因作物的主要目标。Bt 具有很强的选择性压力,因此在种植转基因种子的同时还要种植易感植物(避难所),以降低这种压力。北美洲采用的方法是将 Bt 和非 Bt 种子混合在一起(袋中避难所,或 RIB)。不过,南美农民更喜欢结构化的避难所,将 Bt 和非 Bt 种子间种在行间。然而,为了防止产量损失,必须将易感玉米的比例降至最低,而交配前的飞行距离被认为是衡量结构化避难所中非 Bt 行间适当距离的最佳方法,该距离已通过标记-释放-再捕获实验进行了估算。本研究的目的是在实验室和田间试验中比较三种标记技术和三种诱捕系统。结果表明,传统的标记技术对飞蛾并非完全无害。紫外线诱捕器大大超过了合成信息素和天然信息素的效果,这表明它们可能无法反映正常的扩散行为。标记实验可能无法提供可靠的飞行距离测量方法,尽管农民倾向于抵制 RIB 选项,但数据表明应该强制执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of different marking and trapping methods for Spodoptera frugiperda used to assess structured refuges in Bt maize

The fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) is an important pest of maize, and a key target of transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) insecticidal proteins. These exert a strong selective pressure, so susceptible plants (refuges) are planted together with the transgenic seed to lower such pressure. The system favored in North America is to mix Bt and non-Bt seed (refuge-in-a-bag, or RIB). However, South American farmers favor structured refuges, interplanting rows of Bt and non-Bt seed. Yet, the proportion of susceptible maize must be minimized to prevent yield losses, and flight distance before mating is considered the best way to gauge the adequate distance between non-Bt rows in structured refuges, which has been estimated through mark–release–recapture experiments. The aim of this study was to compare three marking techniques and three trapping systems in laboratory and field experiments. Results suggest conventional marking techniques were not completely innocuous to the moths. UV traps drastically overrode the effect of synthetic and natural pheromones, suggesting they may not reflect normal dispersion behaviors. Marking experiments may not provide reliable measures of flight distance, and although farmers tend to resist the RIB option the data suggests it should be enforced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pest Science
Journal of Pest Science 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pest Science publishes high-quality papers on all aspects of pest science in agriculture, horticulture (including viticulture), forestry, urban pests, and stored products research, including health and safety issues. Journal of Pest Science reports on advances in control of pests and animal vectors of diseases, the biology, ethology and ecology of pests and their antagonists, and the use of other beneficial organisms in pest control. The journal covers all noxious or damaging groups of animals, including arthropods, nematodes, molluscs, and vertebrates. Journal of Pest Science devotes special attention to emerging and innovative pest control strategies, including the side effects of such approaches on non-target organisms, for example natural enemies and pollinators, and the implementation of these strategies in integrated pest management. Journal of Pest Science also publishes papers on the management of agro- and forest ecosystems where this is relevant to pest control. Papers on important methodological developments relevant for pest control will be considered as well.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信