门诊病人肠外抗菌疗法......及其他研究

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2558
Tom Nolan
{"title":"门诊病人肠外抗菌疗法......及其他研究","authors":"Tom Nolan","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tom Nolan reviews this week’s research When it comes to peripherally inserted lines for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), where should one draw the line? Midline catheters, which end in peripheral veins, are thought to offer lower risks of infection and thromboembolism than peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). A new cohort study supports this, finding that, for a device dwell of 14 days or less, midline catheters were associated with a lower risk of major complications (0.9% v 5.3%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.29 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.68)). However, the study design means that confounding by indication—whereby lower risk patients received a midline catheter—is hard to measure and exclude. JAMA Intern Med doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5984 Don’t wait until after prostate cancer diagnosis to consider life expectancy, advises an editorial …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy … and other research\",\"authors\":\"Tom Nolan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj.q2558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tom Nolan reviews this week’s research When it comes to peripherally inserted lines for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), where should one draw the line? Midline catheters, which end in peripheral veins, are thought to offer lower risks of infection and thromboembolism than peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). A new cohort study supports this, finding that, for a device dwell of 14 days or less, midline catheters were associated with a lower risk of major complications (0.9% v 5.3%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.29 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.68)). However, the study design means that confounding by indication—whereby lower risk patients received a midline catheter—is hard to measure and exclude. JAMA Intern Med doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5984 Don’t wait until after prostate cancer diagnosis to consider life expectancy, advises an editorial …\",\"PeriodicalId\":22388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The BMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

汤姆-诺兰(Tom Nolan)回顾本周研究 当谈到用于门诊肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)的外周插入管路时,应该在哪里划线?与外周置入中心静脉导管(PICC)相比,末端位于外周静脉的中线导管被认为具有更低的感染和血栓栓塞风险。一项新的队列研究证实了这一点,该研究发现,在设备停留时间为 14 天或更短的情况下,中线导管发生重大并发症的风险较低(0.9% 对 5.3%,调整后危险比为 0.29(95% CI 0.12 至 0.68))。然而,研究设计意味着很难测量和排除适应症的混杂因素,即风险较低的患者接受中线导管。JAMA Intern Med doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5984 社论建议,不要等到前列腺癌确诊后才考虑预期寿命 ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy … and other research
Tom Nolan reviews this week’s research When it comes to peripherally inserted lines for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), where should one draw the line? Midline catheters, which end in peripheral veins, are thought to offer lower risks of infection and thromboembolism than peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). A new cohort study supports this, finding that, for a device dwell of 14 days or less, midline catheters were associated with a lower risk of major complications (0.9% v 5.3%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.29 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.68)). However, the study design means that confounding by indication—whereby lower risk patients received a midline catheter—is hard to measure and exclude. JAMA Intern Med doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5984 Don’t wait until after prostate cancer diagnosis to consider life expectancy, advises an editorial …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信