治疗干眼症的 LipiFlow:Cochrane 系统综述摘要。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Tsz Wing Yim, Andrew D Pucker, Erin Rueff, William Ngo, Anna A Tichenor, John E Conto
{"title":"治疗干眼症的 LipiFlow:Cochrane 系统综述摘要。","authors":"Tsz Wing Yim, Andrew D Pucker, Erin Rueff, William Ngo, Anna A Tichenor, John E Conto","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2024.102335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of LipiFlow for treating signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following databases were searched for randomized trials: CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase.com, PubMed, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP on 24 October 2022. The included studies were conducted in adults (≥18 years) with DED or meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) as defined by the investigators. Standard Cochrane methodology was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 13 trials that randomized a total of 1,155 participants (66 % female; age range = 19 to 86 years). Five trials compared LipiFlow with basic warm compresses. Analyzing symptom scores in these trials yielded conflicting evidence of a difference in symptoms between LipiFlow and basic warm compresses after 4 weeks. There was no evidence of a difference in meibomian gland expression, meibum quality, or tear breakup time when comparing LipiFlow with basic warm compresses. Another 5 trials compared LipiFlow with thermostatic devices. Analysis of symptom scores in these trials at 4 weeks showed that thermostatic devices had reduced Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores by a mean difference of 4.59 as compared with LipiFlow. The remaining 3 included trials could not be grouped for comparisons. The overall evidence was of low or very low certainty, with most trials being assessed as having a high risk of bias. No trial reported any intervention-related, vision-threating adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LipiFlow performs similarly to other DED treatments. Further research with adequate masking and a standardized testing methodology is still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102335"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LipiFlow for the treatment of dry eye disease: A Cochrane systematic review summary.\",\"authors\":\"Tsz Wing Yim, Andrew D Pucker, Erin Rueff, William Ngo, Anna A Tichenor, John E Conto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clae.2024.102335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of LipiFlow for treating signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following databases were searched for randomized trials: CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase.com, PubMed, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP on 24 October 2022. The included studies were conducted in adults (≥18 years) with DED or meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) as defined by the investigators. Standard Cochrane methodology was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 13 trials that randomized a total of 1,155 participants (66 % female; age range = 19 to 86 years). Five trials compared LipiFlow with basic warm compresses. Analyzing symptom scores in these trials yielded conflicting evidence of a difference in symptoms between LipiFlow and basic warm compresses after 4 weeks. There was no evidence of a difference in meibomian gland expression, meibum quality, or tear breakup time when comparing LipiFlow with basic warm compresses. Another 5 trials compared LipiFlow with thermostatic devices. Analysis of symptom scores in these trials at 4 weeks showed that thermostatic devices had reduced Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores by a mean difference of 4.59 as compared with LipiFlow. The remaining 3 included trials could not be grouped for comparisons. The overall evidence was of low or very low certainty, with most trials being assessed as having a high risk of bias. No trial reported any intervention-related, vision-threating adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LipiFlow performs similarly to other DED treatments. Further research with adequate masking and a standardized testing methodology is still needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102335\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估 LipiFlow 治疗成人干眼病 (DED) 症状和体征的有效性和安全性:在以下数据库中搜索随机试验:方法:2022 年 10 月 24 日,在以下数据库中检索随机试验:CENTRAL、MEDLINE Ovid、Embase.com、PubMed、LILACS、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 WHO ICTRP。纳入的研究对象为研究者定义的患有 DED 或睑板腺功能障碍 (MGD) 的成人(≥18 岁)。研究采用了标准的 Cochrane 方法:本研究包括 13 项试验,共随机抽取了 1,155 名参与者(66% 为女性;年龄范围 = 19 至 86 岁)。其中五项试验对 LipiFlow 和基本热敷进行了比较。对这些试验中的症状评分进行分析后发现,4 周后 LipiFlow 和基本热敷疗法的症状差异证据相互矛盾。在比较 LipiFlow 和基本热敷法时,没有证据表明两者在睑板腺表达、睑板腺质量或泪液破裂时间方面存在差异。另有 5 项试验将 LipiFlow 与恒温设备进行了比较。对这些试验在 4 周后的症状评分进行的分析表明,恒温设备与 LipiFlow 相比,眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评分平均降低了 4.59 分。其余 3 项纳入的试验无法进行分组比较。总体证据的确定性较低或很低,大多数试验被评估为偏倚风险较高。没有一项试验报告了与干预相关的、威胁视力的不良事件:结论:LipiFlow 的效果与其他 DED 治疗方法相似。结论:LipiFlow 与其他 DED 治疗方法的效果相似,但仍需在充分遮盖和标准化测试方法的基础上开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LipiFlow for the treatment of dry eye disease: A Cochrane systematic review summary.

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of LipiFlow for treating signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) in adults.

Methods: The following databases were searched for randomized trials: CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase.com, PubMed, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP on 24 October 2022. The included studies were conducted in adults (≥18 years) with DED or meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) as defined by the investigators. Standard Cochrane methodology was applied.

Results: This study included 13 trials that randomized a total of 1,155 participants (66 % female; age range = 19 to 86 years). Five trials compared LipiFlow with basic warm compresses. Analyzing symptom scores in these trials yielded conflicting evidence of a difference in symptoms between LipiFlow and basic warm compresses after 4 weeks. There was no evidence of a difference in meibomian gland expression, meibum quality, or tear breakup time when comparing LipiFlow with basic warm compresses. Another 5 trials compared LipiFlow with thermostatic devices. Analysis of symptom scores in these trials at 4 weeks showed that thermostatic devices had reduced Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores by a mean difference of 4.59 as compared with LipiFlow. The remaining 3 included trials could not be grouped for comparisons. The overall evidence was of low or very low certainty, with most trials being assessed as having a high risk of bias. No trial reported any intervention-related, vision-threating adverse events.

Conclusions: LipiFlow performs similarly to other DED treatments. Further research with adequate masking and a standardized testing methodology is still needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信