Caterina Beatrice Monti , Lorenzo Maria Giuseppe Bianchi , Francesco Rizzetto , Luca Alessandro Carbonaro , Angelo Vanzulli
{"title":"人工智能模型在胸部 X 光检测气胸方面的诊断性能。","authors":"Caterina Beatrice Monti , Lorenzo Maria Giuseppe Bianchi , Francesco Rizzetto , Luca Alessandro Carbonaro , Angelo Vanzulli","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Pneumothorax (PTX) is a common clinical urgency, its diagnosis is usually performed on chest radiography (CXR), and it presents a setting where artificial intelligence (AI) methods could find terrain in aiding radiologists in facing increasing workloads. Hence, the purpose of our study was to test an AI system for the detection of PTX on CXR examinations, to review its diagnostic performance in such setting alongside that of reading radiologists.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We retrospectively ran an AI system on CXR examinations of patients who were imaged for the suspicion of PTX, and who also underwent computed tomography (CT) within the same day, the latter being used as reference standard. The performance of the proposed AI system was compared to that of reading radiologists, obtained from CXR reports.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, the AI system achieved an accuracy of 74 % (95%CI 68–79 %), with a sensitivity of 66 % (95%CI 59–73 %) and a specificity of 93 % (95%CI 85–97 %). Human readers displayed a comparable accuracy (77 %, 95%CI 71–82 %, <em>p</em> = 0.355), with higher sensitivity (73 %, 95%CI 66–79 %, <em>p</em> = 0.040), albeit lower specificity (85 %, 95%CI 75–91 %, <em>p</em> = 0.034). The performance of AI was influenced by patient positioning at CXR (<em>p</em> = 0.040).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The proposed tool could represent an aid to radiologists in detecting PTX, improving specificity. Further improvement with training on more challenging cases may pave the way for its use as a screening or standalone tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 110355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence model for the detection of pneumothorax at chest X-ray\",\"authors\":\"Caterina Beatrice Monti , Lorenzo Maria Giuseppe Bianchi , Francesco Rizzetto , Luca Alessandro Carbonaro , Angelo Vanzulli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Pneumothorax (PTX) is a common clinical urgency, its diagnosis is usually performed on chest radiography (CXR), and it presents a setting where artificial intelligence (AI) methods could find terrain in aiding radiologists in facing increasing workloads. Hence, the purpose of our study was to test an AI system for the detection of PTX on CXR examinations, to review its diagnostic performance in such setting alongside that of reading radiologists.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We retrospectively ran an AI system on CXR examinations of patients who were imaged for the suspicion of PTX, and who also underwent computed tomography (CT) within the same day, the latter being used as reference standard. The performance of the proposed AI system was compared to that of reading radiologists, obtained from CXR reports.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, the AI system achieved an accuracy of 74 % (95%CI 68–79 %), with a sensitivity of 66 % (95%CI 59–73 %) and a specificity of 93 % (95%CI 85–97 %). Human readers displayed a comparable accuracy (77 %, 95%CI 71–82 %, <em>p</em> = 0.355), with higher sensitivity (73 %, 95%CI 66–79 %, <em>p</em> = 0.040), albeit lower specificity (85 %, 95%CI 75–91 %, <em>p</em> = 0.034). The performance of AI was influenced by patient positioning at CXR (<em>p</em> = 0.040).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The proposed tool could represent an aid to radiologists in detecting PTX, improving specificity. Further improvement with training on more challenging cases may pave the way for its use as a screening or standalone tool.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002857\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002857","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence model for the detection of pneumothorax at chest X-ray
Purpose
Pneumothorax (PTX) is a common clinical urgency, its diagnosis is usually performed on chest radiography (CXR), and it presents a setting where artificial intelligence (AI) methods could find terrain in aiding radiologists in facing increasing workloads. Hence, the purpose of our study was to test an AI system for the detection of PTX on CXR examinations, to review its diagnostic performance in such setting alongside that of reading radiologists.
Method
We retrospectively ran an AI system on CXR examinations of patients who were imaged for the suspicion of PTX, and who also underwent computed tomography (CT) within the same day, the latter being used as reference standard. The performance of the proposed AI system was compared to that of reading radiologists, obtained from CXR reports.
Results
Overall, the AI system achieved an accuracy of 74 % (95%CI 68–79 %), with a sensitivity of 66 % (95%CI 59–73 %) and a specificity of 93 % (95%CI 85–97 %). Human readers displayed a comparable accuracy (77 %, 95%CI 71–82 %, p = 0.355), with higher sensitivity (73 %, 95%CI 66–79 %, p = 0.040), albeit lower specificity (85 %, 95%CI 75–91 %, p = 0.034). The performance of AI was influenced by patient positioning at CXR (p = 0.040).
Conclusions
The proposed tool could represent an aid to radiologists in detecting PTX, improving specificity. Further improvement with training on more challenging cases may pave the way for its use as a screening or standalone tool.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology