[使用高通量透析器的中央透析液输送系统(CDDS)与常规水处理站对常规血液透析患者内毒素血症和炎症指标的影响]。

Q4 Medicine
Urologiia Pub Date : 2024-11-01
Ahmed Mohamed Tawfik Ahmed Mohamed Tawfik, Howaida Abd ELhamid Elshinnawy Howaida Abd ELhamid Elshinnawy, Hesham Mohamed ElSayed Hesham Mohamed ElSayed, Heba Wahid El Said Heba Wahid El Said, Hoda Mohamed Hammoda Hoda Mohamed Hammoda, Marwa Shaban Abd El Samea Marwa Shaban Abd El Samea
{"title":"[使用高通量透析器的中央透析液输送系统(CDDS)与常规水处理站对常规血液透析患者内毒素血症和炎症指标的影响]。","authors":"Ahmed Mohamed Tawfik Ahmed Mohamed Tawfik, Howaida Abd ELhamid Elshinnawy Howaida Abd ELhamid Elshinnawy, Hesham Mohamed ElSayed Hesham Mohamed ElSayed, Heba Wahid El Said Heba Wahid El Said, Hoda Mohamed Hammoda Hoda Mohamed Hammoda, Marwa Shaban Abd El Samea Marwa Shaban Abd El Samea","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this study, we compared the effects of a single patient dialysis fluid delivery system (SPDDS) against a continuous dialysis fluid delivery system (CDDS) on inflammatory markers and endotoxemia in a population of patients receiving routine hemodialysis (HD) at Ain Shams University.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty prevalent HD patients, ages 18 to 60, who were clinically stable and receiving thrice weekly dialysis treatments via an arteriovenous fistula were the subjects of a cross-sectional research. The study excluded patients with double lumen venous catheters used for hemodialysis, acute infections, cancer, and chronic liver disease. Two groups of patients were created by random selection: group I underwent HD using a CDDS water purification system that was implemented at El Demerdash Hospital two years prior, and group II underwent HD using an SPDDS water purification system at Ain Shams University Specialised Hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, laboratory, inflammatory marker, and demographic data were gathered. Serum samples were taken before and after dialysis to assess the endotoxin levels in each group. Pre-dialysis endotoxin levels were significantly lower in the CDDS group (0.07+/-0.05) compared to the SPDDS group (0.20+/-0.07) with a P value <0.001, and post-dialysis serum endotoxin levels were significantly lower in the CDDS group (0.04+/-0.02) compared to the SDDPS (0.15+/-0.03) with a P value <0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our research, the CDDS groups circulating endotoxins had significantly decreased.</p>","PeriodicalId":23546,"journal":{"name":"Urologiia","volume":" 5","pages":"90-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effect of Central Dialysis Fluid Delivery System (CDDS) using high flux dialyzer versus Regular water treatment stations on endotoxemia and inflammatory markers among prevalent patients on Regular Hemodialysis].\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Mohamed Tawfik Ahmed Mohamed Tawfik, Howaida Abd ELhamid Elshinnawy Howaida Abd ELhamid Elshinnawy, Hesham Mohamed ElSayed Hesham Mohamed ElSayed, Heba Wahid El Said Heba Wahid El Said, Hoda Mohamed Hammoda Hoda Mohamed Hammoda, Marwa Shaban Abd El Samea Marwa Shaban Abd El Samea\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this study, we compared the effects of a single patient dialysis fluid delivery system (SPDDS) against a continuous dialysis fluid delivery system (CDDS) on inflammatory markers and endotoxemia in a population of patients receiving routine hemodialysis (HD) at Ain Shams University.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty prevalent HD patients, ages 18 to 60, who were clinically stable and receiving thrice weekly dialysis treatments via an arteriovenous fistula were the subjects of a cross-sectional research. The study excluded patients with double lumen venous catheters used for hemodialysis, acute infections, cancer, and chronic liver disease. Two groups of patients were created by random selection: group I underwent HD using a CDDS water purification system that was implemented at El Demerdash Hospital two years prior, and group II underwent HD using an SPDDS water purification system at Ain Shams University Specialised Hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, laboratory, inflammatory marker, and demographic data were gathered. Serum samples were taken before and after dialysis to assess the endotoxin levels in each group. Pre-dialysis endotoxin levels were significantly lower in the CDDS group (0.07+/-0.05) compared to the SPDDS group (0.20+/-0.07) with a P value <0.001, and post-dialysis serum endotoxin levels were significantly lower in the CDDS group (0.04+/-0.02) compared to the SDDPS (0.15+/-0.03) with a P value <0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our research, the CDDS groups circulating endotoxins had significantly decreased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologiia\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"90-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在这项研究中,我们比较了单个患者透析液输送系统(SPDDS)和连续透析液输送系统(CDDS)对艾因夏姆斯大学接受常规血液透析(HD)患者的炎症标志物和内毒素血症的影响:横断面研究的对象是 80 名年龄在 18 岁至 60 岁之间、临床病情稳定、每周通过动静脉瘘接受三次透析治疗的常见血液透析患者。研究排除了使用双腔静脉导管进行血液透析、急性感染、癌症和慢性肝病的患者。研究人员随机抽取了两组患者:第一组使用 CDDS 水净化系统进行血液透析,该系统两年前在 El Demerdash 医院投入使用;第二组使用 SPDDS 水净化系统进行血液透析,该系统在艾因夏姆斯大学专科医院投入使用:两组均收集了实验室、炎症标志物和人口统计学数据。在透析前后采集血清样本,以评估各组的内毒素水平。CDDS 组透析前的内毒素水平(0.07+/-0.05)明显低于 SPDDS 组(0.20+/-0.07),P 值为 结论:根据我们的研究,CDDS 组的循环内毒素明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Effect of Central Dialysis Fluid Delivery System (CDDS) using high flux dialyzer versus Regular water treatment stations on endotoxemia and inflammatory markers among prevalent patients on Regular Hemodialysis].

Purpose: In this study, we compared the effects of a single patient dialysis fluid delivery system (SPDDS) against a continuous dialysis fluid delivery system (CDDS) on inflammatory markers and endotoxemia in a population of patients receiving routine hemodialysis (HD) at Ain Shams University.

Materials and methods: Eighty prevalent HD patients, ages 18 to 60, who were clinically stable and receiving thrice weekly dialysis treatments via an arteriovenous fistula were the subjects of a cross-sectional research. The study excluded patients with double lumen venous catheters used for hemodialysis, acute infections, cancer, and chronic liver disease. Two groups of patients were created by random selection: group I underwent HD using a CDDS water purification system that was implemented at El Demerdash Hospital two years prior, and group II underwent HD using an SPDDS water purification system at Ain Shams University Specialised Hospital.

Results: In both groups, laboratory, inflammatory marker, and demographic data were gathered. Serum samples were taken before and after dialysis to assess the endotoxin levels in each group. Pre-dialysis endotoxin levels were significantly lower in the CDDS group (0.07+/-0.05) compared to the SPDDS group (0.20+/-0.07) with a P value <0.001, and post-dialysis serum endotoxin levels were significantly lower in the CDDS group (0.04+/-0.02) compared to the SDDPS (0.15+/-0.03) with a P value <0.001.

Conclusion: According to our research, the CDDS groups circulating endotoxins had significantly decreased.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologiia
Urologiia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信