格拉斯哥昏迷量表、快速败血症相关器官衰竭评估、碱过量和乳酸对急诊科重症患者死亡率预测的比较分析。

IF 1.1 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Gürbüz Meral, Şenol Ardıç, Serkan Günay, Kadir Güzel, Ahmet Köse, Hülya Gençbay Durmuş, Serhat Uysal, Aydın Coşkun
{"title":"格拉斯哥昏迷量表、快速败血症相关器官衰竭评估、碱过量和乳酸对急诊科重症患者死亡率预测的比较分析。","authors":"Gürbüz Meral, Şenol Ardıç, Serkan Günay, Kadir Güzel, Ahmet Köse, Hülya Gençbay Durmuş, Serhat Uysal, Aydın Coşkun","doi":"10.4103/tjem.tjem_45_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is crucial to promptly identify high-mortality patients in emergency departments and initiate their treatment as soon as possible. Although many parameters have been studied to select patients with high mortality, no comprehensive evaluation exists in previous literature on these parameters in critically ill patients, regardless of patient groups. The aim of this study is to evaluate the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), blood gas base excess (BE), and blood gas lactate in predicting mortality in critically ill patients admitted to the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational cohort study included adult patients with Emergency Severity Index 1-2 (critically ill) admitted to the emergency department. All patients were evaluated by the physician within 10 min, and blood gas samples were taken. The data collection forms recorded the patients' GCS and qSOFA scores at the time of first evaluation by the physician. The qSOFA score assessment was performed in all patients with ESI levels 1 and 2, regardless of whether infective pathology was suspected. Blood gas BE and lactate values were also from laboratory test results. Patients or their relatives were contacted by phone at the end of the 1<sup>st</sup> month to obtain information about the clinical condition (survival or mortality).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 868 patients were included, with 163 deaths observed within 30 days. GCS score, qSOFA score, and lactate value were significant in predicting mortality within 30 days. While the BE value was significant for predicting 30-day mortality for values equal to or below the lower limit of -1.5 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), it was not significant for values equal to or above the upper limit of +3 (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The most successful prediction model for predicting 30-day mortality was found to be qSOFA with a cutoff value of ≥1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In emergency departments, each of the GCS, qSOFA scores, BE, and lactate values can be used independently as a practical mortality prediction model in critically ill patients. Among these four models, qSOFA is the most successful practical mortality prediction model in critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46536,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 4","pages":"231-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of Glasgow Coma Scale, quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, base excess, and lactate for mortality prediction in critically ill emergency department patients.\",\"authors\":\"Gürbüz Meral, Şenol Ardıç, Serkan Günay, Kadir Güzel, Ahmet Köse, Hülya Gençbay Durmuş, Serhat Uysal, Aydın Coşkun\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tjem.tjem_45_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is crucial to promptly identify high-mortality patients in emergency departments and initiate their treatment as soon as possible. Although many parameters have been studied to select patients with high mortality, no comprehensive evaluation exists in previous literature on these parameters in critically ill patients, regardless of patient groups. The aim of this study is to evaluate the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), blood gas base excess (BE), and blood gas lactate in predicting mortality in critically ill patients admitted to the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational cohort study included adult patients with Emergency Severity Index 1-2 (critically ill) admitted to the emergency department. All patients were evaluated by the physician within 10 min, and blood gas samples were taken. The data collection forms recorded the patients' GCS and qSOFA scores at the time of first evaluation by the physician. The qSOFA score assessment was performed in all patients with ESI levels 1 and 2, regardless of whether infective pathology was suspected. Blood gas BE and lactate values were also from laboratory test results. Patients or their relatives were contacted by phone at the end of the 1<sup>st</sup> month to obtain information about the clinical condition (survival or mortality).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 868 patients were included, with 163 deaths observed within 30 days. GCS score, qSOFA score, and lactate value were significant in predicting mortality within 30 days. While the BE value was significant for predicting 30-day mortality for values equal to or below the lower limit of -1.5 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), it was not significant for values equal to or above the upper limit of +3 (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The most successful prediction model for predicting 30-day mortality was found to be qSOFA with a cutoff value of ≥1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In emergency departments, each of the GCS, qSOFA scores, BE, and lactate values can be used independently as a practical mortality prediction model in critically ill patients. Among these four models, qSOFA is the most successful practical mortality prediction model in critically ill patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"231-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573172/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_45_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_45_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在急诊科及时发现死亡率高的患者并尽快开始治疗至关重要。尽管已经研究了许多用于选择高死亡率患者的参数,但以往的文献中并没有对重症患者的这些参数进行全面评估,也没有考虑患者群体。本研究旨在评估格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、快速败血症相关器官功能衰竭评估(qSOFA)、血气碱过量(BE)和血气乳酸盐在预测急诊科收治的重症患者死亡率方面的作用:这项前瞻性观察性队列研究包括急诊科收治的急诊严重程度指数为 1-2 的成年重症患者。医生在 10 分钟内对所有患者进行了评估,并采集了血气样本。数据收集表记录了患者首次接受医生评估时的 GCS 和 qSOFA 评分。无论是否怀疑存在感染性病变,均对所有 ESI 等级为 1 级和 2 级的患者进行 qSOFA 评分评估。血气 BE 和乳酸值也来自实验室检测结果。在第一个月结束时通过电话联系患者或其亲属,以了解临床状况(存活率或死亡率):结果:共纳入 868 名患者,其中 163 人在 30 天内死亡。GCS评分、qSOFA评分和乳酸值对预测30天内的死亡率有显著作用。当BE值等于或低于下限-1.5时,预测30天内死亡率有意义(P < 0.001),而当BE值等于或高于上限+3时,预测30天内死亡率无意义(P > 0.05)。预测 30 天死亡率最成功的预测模型是 qSOFA,其临界值≥1.结论:结论:在急诊科,GCS、qSOFA 评分、BE 和乳酸值可单独用作危重症患者的实用死亡率预测模型。在这四个模型中,qSOFA 是最成功的危重病人实用死亡率预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of Glasgow Coma Scale, quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, base excess, and lactate for mortality prediction in critically ill emergency department patients.

Objectives: It is crucial to promptly identify high-mortality patients in emergency departments and initiate their treatment as soon as possible. Although many parameters have been studied to select patients with high mortality, no comprehensive evaluation exists in previous literature on these parameters in critically ill patients, regardless of patient groups. The aim of this study is to evaluate the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), blood gas base excess (BE), and blood gas lactate in predicting mortality in critically ill patients admitted to the emergency department.

Methods: This prospective observational cohort study included adult patients with Emergency Severity Index 1-2 (critically ill) admitted to the emergency department. All patients were evaluated by the physician within 10 min, and blood gas samples were taken. The data collection forms recorded the patients' GCS and qSOFA scores at the time of first evaluation by the physician. The qSOFA score assessment was performed in all patients with ESI levels 1 and 2, regardless of whether infective pathology was suspected. Blood gas BE and lactate values were also from laboratory test results. Patients or their relatives were contacted by phone at the end of the 1st month to obtain information about the clinical condition (survival or mortality).

Results: A total of 868 patients were included, with 163 deaths observed within 30 days. GCS score, qSOFA score, and lactate value were significant in predicting mortality within 30 days. While the BE value was significant for predicting 30-day mortality for values equal to or below the lower limit of -1.5 (P < 0.001), it was not significant for values equal to or above the upper limit of +3 (P > 0.05). The most successful prediction model for predicting 30-day mortality was found to be qSOFA with a cutoff value of ≥1.

Conclusion: In emergency departments, each of the GCS, qSOFA scores, BE, and lactate values can be used independently as a practical mortality prediction model in critically ill patients. Among these four models, qSOFA is the most successful practical mortality prediction model in critically ill patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine (Turk J Emerg Med) is an International, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes clinical and experimental trials, case reports, invited reviews, case images, letters to the Editor, and interesting research conducted in all fields of Emergency Medicine. The Journal is the official scientific publication of the Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey (EMAT) and is printed four times a year, in January, April, July and October. The language of the journal is English. The Journal is based on independent and unbiased double-blinded peer-reviewed principles. Only unpublished papers that are not under review for publication elsewhere can be submitted. The authors are responsible for the scientific content of the material to be published. The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine reserves the right to request any research materials on which the paper is based. The Editorial Board of the Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine and the Publisher adheres to the principles of the International Council of Medical Journal Editors, the World Association of Medical Editors, the Council of Science Editors, the Committee on Publication Ethics, the US National Library of Medicine, the US Office of Research Integrity, the European Association of Science Editors, and the International Society of Managing and Technical Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信