经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)联合椎间窦神经消融术与经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症腰痛的疗效对比。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Yanjun Huang, Shangshu Wei, Shuyue Yang, Yanzhu Shen, Haoning Ma, Ping Yi, Xiangsheng Tang
{"title":"经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)联合椎间窦神经消融术与经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症腰痛的疗效对比。","authors":"Yanjun Huang, Shangshu Wei, Shuyue Yang, Yanzhu Shen, Haoning Ma, Ping Yi, Xiangsheng Tang","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05269-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has demonstrated variable efficacy in alleviating low back pain (LBP) associated with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Sinuvertebral nerve ablation (SNA), which targets the nociceptive pathway implicated in discogenic LBP pathogenesis, has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy. The efficacy of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation in enhancing PELD for the treatment of LBP in patients with LDH remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on LDH patients with concomitant LBP treated at the Spinal Surgery Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, from June 2020 to June 2023. Participants were categorized into two groups: PELD combined with SNA (n = 51) and PELD alone (n = 46). Primary outcome measures included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited significant improvements in VAS, JOA, and ODI scores for LBP and leg pain postoperatively compared to preoperative assessments. Notably, the PELD combined with SNA group demonstrated statistically significant superior outcomes in VAS, JOA, and ODI scores specifically for LBP compared to the PELD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of PELD with SNA significantly improves LBP outcomes compared to PELD alone in LDH patients. While the observed improvements did not reach the minimal clinically important differences (MICD), these findings suggest that SNA may enhance the efficacy of PELD in LBP management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"769"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) combined with sinuvertebral nerve ablation versus PELD for low back pain in lumbar disc herniation.\",\"authors\":\"Yanjun Huang, Shangshu Wei, Shuyue Yang, Yanzhu Shen, Haoning Ma, Ping Yi, Xiangsheng Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-024-05269-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has demonstrated variable efficacy in alleviating low back pain (LBP) associated with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Sinuvertebral nerve ablation (SNA), which targets the nociceptive pathway implicated in discogenic LBP pathogenesis, has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy. The efficacy of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation in enhancing PELD for the treatment of LBP in patients with LDH remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on LDH patients with concomitant LBP treated at the Spinal Surgery Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, from June 2020 to June 2023. Participants were categorized into two groups: PELD combined with SNA (n = 51) and PELD alone (n = 46). Primary outcome measures included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited significant improvements in VAS, JOA, and ODI scores for LBP and leg pain postoperatively compared to preoperative assessments. Notably, the PELD combined with SNA group demonstrated statistically significant superior outcomes in VAS, JOA, and ODI scores specifically for LBP compared to the PELD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of PELD with SNA significantly improves LBP outcomes compared to PELD alone in LDH patients. While the observed improvements did not reach the minimal clinically important differences (MICD), these findings suggest that SNA may enhance the efficacy of PELD in LBP management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575413/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05269-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05269-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)在缓解腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)引起的腰背痛(LBP)方面疗效不一。椎间神经消融术(SNA)针对的是与椎间盘源性腰背痛发病机制有关的痛觉通路,已成为一种潜在的辅助疗法。内窥镜射频消融术在增强 PELD 治疗 LDH 患者 LBP 方面的疗效仍不明确:一项回顾性队列研究针对 2020 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月期间在中日友好医院脊柱外科接受治疗的伴有 LBP 的 LDH 患者。研究对象分为两组:PELD联合SNA组(51人)和单纯PELD组(46人)。主要结果指标包括基线和1、3、6个月随访时的疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI):结果:与术前评估相比,两组患者术后在腰痛和腿痛方面的 VAS、JOA 和 ODI 评分均有明显改善。值得注意的是,与 PELD 组相比,PELD 联合 SNA 组在 VAS、JOA 和 ODI 评分(尤其是 LBP 评分)方面的疗效具有统计学意义:结论:在 LDH 患者中,PELD 与 SNA 联合治疗与单独使用 PELD 相比,可显著改善 LBP 治疗效果。虽然观察到的改善未达到最小临床重要性差异(MICD),但这些研究结果表明,SNA 可增强 PELD 在治疗 LBP 方面的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) combined with sinuvertebral nerve ablation versus PELD for low back pain in lumbar disc herniation.

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has demonstrated variable efficacy in alleviating low back pain (LBP) associated with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Sinuvertebral nerve ablation (SNA), which targets the nociceptive pathway implicated in discogenic LBP pathogenesis, has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy. The efficacy of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation in enhancing PELD for the treatment of LBP in patients with LDH remains unclear.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on LDH patients with concomitant LBP treated at the Spinal Surgery Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, from June 2020 to June 2023. Participants were categorized into two groups: PELD combined with SNA (n = 51) and PELD alone (n = 46). Primary outcome measures included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups.

Results: Both groups exhibited significant improvements in VAS, JOA, and ODI scores for LBP and leg pain postoperatively compared to preoperative assessments. Notably, the PELD combined with SNA group demonstrated statistically significant superior outcomes in VAS, JOA, and ODI scores specifically for LBP compared to the PELD group.

Conclusion: The combination of PELD with SNA significantly improves LBP outcomes compared to PELD alone in LDH patients. While the observed improvements did not reach the minimal clinically important differences (MICD), these findings suggest that SNA may enhance the efficacy of PELD in LBP management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信