三种骶骨螺钉内固定技术在治疗伴有骨质疏松症的 L4-S1 腰椎退行性疾病中的比较:一项回顾性观察研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Guo-Ning Gu, Teng Liu, Jie Ding, Hui-Zhi Guo, Guo-Ye Mo, Yong-Xian Li, Kai Yuan, Zhi-Dong Yang, Shun-Cong Zhang, Yong-Chao Tang
{"title":"三种骶骨螺钉内固定技术在治疗伴有骨质疏松症的 L4-S1 腰椎退行性疾病中的比较:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Guo-Ning Gu, Teng Liu, Jie Ding, Hui-Zhi Guo, Guo-Ye Mo, Yong-Xian Li, Kai Yuan, Zhi-Dong Yang, Shun-Cong Zhang, Yong-Chao Tang","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05281-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with L4-S1 lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) with osteoporosis are prone to sacral-screw loosening during spinal internal fixation. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and imaging results of sacral bicortical, tricortical, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-augmented pedicle-screw fixation in the treatment of L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study, 72 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups according to the S1-screw fixation method: PMMA-augmented pedicle-screw fixation (Group A, n = 26), bicortical fixation (Group B, n = 22), and tricortical fixation (Group C, n = 24). The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded preoperatively and at the last follow-up, and the postoperative complications, screw-loosening rate, and fusion rate were compared between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon the last follow-up, the VAS and ODI scores of the three groups were significantly improved compared with those recorded preoperatively. The VAS and ODI scores of Group A were significantly smaller than those of Groups B and C (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between Groups B and C. Moreover, the screw-loosening rate of Group A was significantly lower than that of Groups B and C (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between Groups B and C. No significant difference was noted in postoperative complications, bone-cement leakage rates, and intervertebral fusion rates among the three groups. Furthermore, we found that osteoporosis and change of lumbar lordosis(LL) value were independent risk factors for sacral-screw loosening in patients with L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When patients with L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis undergo lumbosacral fusion and fixation, the use of S1 pedicle screws with PMMA augmentation has better stability and less screw loosening. Furthermore, we recommend this surgery for patients with osteoporosis, and the LL should be increased as much as possible during the operation to restore the matching of lumbar and pelvic parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of three sacral screw internal fixation techniques in the treatment of L4-S1 lumbar degenerative disease with osteoporosis: a retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Guo-Ning Gu, Teng Liu, Jie Ding, Hui-Zhi Guo, Guo-Ye Mo, Yong-Xian Li, Kai Yuan, Zhi-Dong Yang, Shun-Cong Zhang, Yong-Chao Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-024-05281-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with L4-S1 lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) with osteoporosis are prone to sacral-screw loosening during spinal internal fixation. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and imaging results of sacral bicortical, tricortical, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-augmented pedicle-screw fixation in the treatment of L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study, 72 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups according to the S1-screw fixation method: PMMA-augmented pedicle-screw fixation (Group A, n = 26), bicortical fixation (Group B, n = 22), and tricortical fixation (Group C, n = 24). The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded preoperatively and at the last follow-up, and the postoperative complications, screw-loosening rate, and fusion rate were compared between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon the last follow-up, the VAS and ODI scores of the three groups were significantly improved compared with those recorded preoperatively. The VAS and ODI scores of Group A were significantly smaller than those of Groups B and C (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between Groups B and C. Moreover, the screw-loosening rate of Group A was significantly lower than that of Groups B and C (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between Groups B and C. No significant difference was noted in postoperative complications, bone-cement leakage rates, and intervertebral fusion rates among the three groups. Furthermore, we found that osteoporosis and change of lumbar lordosis(LL) value were independent risk factors for sacral-screw loosening in patients with L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When patients with L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis undergo lumbosacral fusion and fixation, the use of S1 pedicle screws with PMMA augmentation has better stability and less screw loosening. Furthermore, we recommend this surgery for patients with osteoporosis, and the LL should be increased as much as possible during the operation to restore the matching of lumbar and pelvic parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05281-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05281-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:伴有骨质疏松症的 L4-S1 腰椎退行性疾病(LDD)患者在脊柱内固定过程中容易发生骶骨螺钉松动。我们旨在比较骶骨双皮质、三皮质和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)增强椎弓根螺钉固定治疗伴骨质疏松症的 L4-S1 腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效和影像学结果:这是一项回顾性研究,共纳入72例患者,根据S1-螺钉固定方法分为三组:PMMA增强椎弓根螺钉固定(A组,n = 26)、双皮质固定(B组,n = 22)和三皮质固定(C组,n = 24)。记录术前和最后一次随访时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)和 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI),比较三组的术后并发症、螺钉松动率和融合率:最后一次随访时,三组患者的 VAS 和 ODI 评分与术前相比均有明显改善。A组的VAS和ODI评分明显小于B组和C组(P 结论:A组的VAS和ODI评分明显小于B组和C组(P):当患有 L4-S1 LDD 并伴有骨质疏松症的患者接受腰骶部融合固定术时,使用带有 PMMA 增强材料的 S1 椎弓根螺钉具有更好的稳定性和更少的螺钉松动。此外,我们建议骨质疏松症患者采用这种手术,并且在手术过程中应尽可能增加 LL,以恢复腰椎和骨盆参数的匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of three sacral screw internal fixation techniques in the treatment of L4-S1 lumbar degenerative disease with osteoporosis: a retrospective observational study.

Background: Patients with L4-S1 lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) with osteoporosis are prone to sacral-screw loosening during spinal internal fixation. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and imaging results of sacral bicortical, tricortical, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-augmented pedicle-screw fixation in the treatment of L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis.

Methods: This is a retrospective study, 72 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups according to the S1-screw fixation method: PMMA-augmented pedicle-screw fixation (Group A, n = 26), bicortical fixation (Group B, n = 22), and tricortical fixation (Group C, n = 24). The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded preoperatively and at the last follow-up, and the postoperative complications, screw-loosening rate, and fusion rate were compared between the three groups.

Results: Upon the last follow-up, the VAS and ODI scores of the three groups were significantly improved compared with those recorded preoperatively. The VAS and ODI scores of Group A were significantly smaller than those of Groups B and C (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between Groups B and C. Moreover, the screw-loosening rate of Group A was significantly lower than that of Groups B and C (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between Groups B and C. No significant difference was noted in postoperative complications, bone-cement leakage rates, and intervertebral fusion rates among the three groups. Furthermore, we found that osteoporosis and change of lumbar lordosis(LL) value were independent risk factors for sacral-screw loosening in patients with L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis.

Conclusions: When patients with L4-S1 LDD with osteoporosis undergo lumbosacral fusion and fixation, the use of S1 pedicle screws with PMMA augmentation has better stability and less screw loosening. Furthermore, we recommend this surgery for patients with osteoporosis, and the LL should be increased as much as possible during the operation to restore the matching of lumbar and pelvic parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信