用于修复血管损伤的生物工程人体动脉。

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Ernest E Moore, Michael Curi, Nicholas Namias, Rishi Kundi, Ying Wei Lum, Charles J Fox, Ravi R Rajani, Todd E Rasmussen, Oleksandr Sokolov, Laura E Niklason, Zakaria Khondker, Shamik J Parikh
{"title":"用于修复血管损伤的生物工程人体动脉。","authors":"Ernest E Moore, Michael Curi, Nicholas Namias, Rishi Kundi, Ying Wei Lum, Charles J Fox, Ravi R Rajani, Todd E Rasmussen, Oleksandr Sokolov, Laura E Niklason, Zakaria Khondker, Shamik J Parikh","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Vascular injuries require urgent repair to minimize loss of limb and life. Standard revascularization relies on autologous vein or synthetic grafts, but alternative options are needed when adequate vein is not feasible and when clinical conditions preclude safe use of synthetic materials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of the acellular tissue engineered vessel (ATEV) in the repair of arterial injuries.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Two open-label, single-arm, nonrandomized clinical trials, including 1 prospective civilian study (CLN-PRO-V005 [V005]) and 1 retrospective observational study in a war zone (CLN-PRO-V017 [V017]), were conducted from September 2018 to January 2024 (follow-up ongoing) at 19 level 1 trauma centers in the US and Israel and 5 frontline hospitals in Ukraine. Patients had vascular injury, no autologous vein available for emergent revascularization, and risk factors for wound infection. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The ATEV is a bioengineered vascular conduit grown from human vascular cells, available off the shelf, and implantable without immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary patency at day 30 was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included limb salvage, graft infection, and patient survival. A systematic literature review identified synthetic graft benchmarks in the treatment of arterial trauma for the same end points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The V005 and V017 studies evaluated 69 and 17 patients, respectively, and included 51 in V005 and 16 in V017 with noniatrogenic arterial injuries of the extremities. The majority were male (V005, 38 [74.5%]; V017, 16 [100%]), the mean (SD) ages were similar (V005, 33.5 [13.6] years; V017, 34.2 [9.0] years), and the mean (SD) Injury Severity Scores were similar (V005, 20.8 [10.5]; V017, 20.1 [18.9]). Penetrating injuries dominated (V005, 29 patients [56.9%]; V017, 14 patients [87.5%]). At day 30 for the V005 and V017 trials, respectively, ATEV primary patency was 84.3% (95% CI, 72.0%-91.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); secondary patency was 90.2% (95% CI, 79.0%-95.7%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); amputation rate was 9.8% (95% CI, 4.3%-21.0%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); ATEV infection rate was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.4%-10.3%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); and death rate was 5.9% (95% CI, 2.0%-15.9%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%) (no deaths attributed to the ATEV). Day 30 synthetic graft benchmarks were as follows: secondary patency, 78.9%; amputation, 24.3%; infection, 8.4%; and death, 3.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of 2 single-arm trials in civilian and real-world military settings suggest that the ATEV provides benefits in terms of patency, limb salvage, and infection resistance. Comparing ATEV outcomes with synthetic graft benchmarks demonstrates improved outcomes in the treatment of acute vascular injuries of the extremities.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03005418, NCT05873959.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioengineered Human Arteries for the Repair of Vascular Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Ernest E Moore, Michael Curi, Nicholas Namias, Rishi Kundi, Ying Wei Lum, Charles J Fox, Ravi R Rajani, Todd E Rasmussen, Oleksandr Sokolov, Laura E Niklason, Zakaria Khondker, Shamik J Parikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Vascular injuries require urgent repair to minimize loss of limb and life. Standard revascularization relies on autologous vein or synthetic grafts, but alternative options are needed when adequate vein is not feasible and when clinical conditions preclude safe use of synthetic materials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of the acellular tissue engineered vessel (ATEV) in the repair of arterial injuries.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Two open-label, single-arm, nonrandomized clinical trials, including 1 prospective civilian study (CLN-PRO-V005 [V005]) and 1 retrospective observational study in a war zone (CLN-PRO-V017 [V017]), were conducted from September 2018 to January 2024 (follow-up ongoing) at 19 level 1 trauma centers in the US and Israel and 5 frontline hospitals in Ukraine. Patients had vascular injury, no autologous vein available for emergent revascularization, and risk factors for wound infection. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The ATEV is a bioengineered vascular conduit grown from human vascular cells, available off the shelf, and implantable without immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary patency at day 30 was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included limb salvage, graft infection, and patient survival. A systematic literature review identified synthetic graft benchmarks in the treatment of arterial trauma for the same end points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The V005 and V017 studies evaluated 69 and 17 patients, respectively, and included 51 in V005 and 16 in V017 with noniatrogenic arterial injuries of the extremities. The majority were male (V005, 38 [74.5%]; V017, 16 [100%]), the mean (SD) ages were similar (V005, 33.5 [13.6] years; V017, 34.2 [9.0] years), and the mean (SD) Injury Severity Scores were similar (V005, 20.8 [10.5]; V017, 20.1 [18.9]). Penetrating injuries dominated (V005, 29 patients [56.9%]; V017, 14 patients [87.5%]). At day 30 for the V005 and V017 trials, respectively, ATEV primary patency was 84.3% (95% CI, 72.0%-91.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); secondary patency was 90.2% (95% CI, 79.0%-95.7%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); amputation rate was 9.8% (95% CI, 4.3%-21.0%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); ATEV infection rate was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.4%-10.3%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); and death rate was 5.9% (95% CI, 2.0%-15.9%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%) (no deaths attributed to the ATEV). Day 30 synthetic graft benchmarks were as follows: secondary patency, 78.9%; amputation, 24.3%; infection, 8.4%; and death, 3.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of 2 single-arm trials in civilian and real-world military settings suggest that the ATEV provides benefits in terms of patency, limb salvage, and infection resistance. Comparing ATEV outcomes with synthetic graft benchmarks demonstrates improved outcomes in the treatment of acute vascular injuries of the extremities.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03005418, NCT05873959.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4893\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4893","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:血管损伤需要紧急修复,以尽量减少肢体和生命损失。标准的血管再造术依赖于自体静脉或合成移植物,但当无法获得足够的静脉以及临床条件不允许安全使用合成材料时,就需要替代方案:评估无细胞组织工程血管(ATEV)在修复动脉损伤方面的性能:两项开放标签、单臂、非随机临床试验,包括 1 项前瞻性民用研究(CLN-PRO-V005 [V005])和 1 项战区回顾性观察研究(CLN-PRO-V017 [V017]),于 2018 年 9 月至 2024 年 1 月在美国和以色列的 19 家一级创伤中心以及乌克兰的 5 家前线医院进行(随访仍在进行中)。患者存在血管损伤、无自体静脉可供紧急血管再通,以及伤口感染的风险因素。数据分析时间为 2023 年 9 月至 2024 年 1 月:ATEV是一种由人类血管细胞培育而成的生物工程血管导管,现货供应,无需免疫抑制即可植入:主要结果和测量指标:第30天的主要通畅率是主要结果。次要结果包括肢体挽救率、移植物感染率和患者存活率。系统性文献综述确定了动脉创伤治疗中相同终点的合成移植物基准:V005 和 V017 两项研究分别对 69 名和 17 名患者进行了评估,其中 V005 和 V017 分别对 51 名和 16 名四肢非iatrogenic 动脉损伤患者进行了评估。大部分患者为男性(V005,38 [74.5%];V017,16 [100%]),平均(标清)年龄相似(V005,33.5 [13.6]岁;V017,34.2 [9.0]岁),平均(标清)损伤严重程度评分相似(V005,20.8 [10.5];V017,20.1 [18.9])。穿透性损伤占多数(V005,29 名患者 [56.9%];V017,14 名患者 [87.5%])。在 V005 和 V017 试验的第 30 天,ATEV 一级通畅率分别为 84.3%(95% CI,72.0%-91.8%)和 93.8%(95% CI,71.7%-98.9%);二级通畅率分别为 90.2%(95% CI,79.0%-95.7%)和 93.8%(95% CI,71.7%-98.9%);截肢率分别为 9.8%(95% CI,4.3%-21.0%)和 0%(95% CI,0.0%-19.4%);ATEV 感染率为 2.0%(95% CI,0.4%-10.3%)和 0%(95% CI,0.0%-19.4%);死亡率为 5.9%(95% CI,2.0%-15.9%)和 0%(95% CI,0.0%-19.4%)(没有因 ATEV 导致的死亡)。第30天合成移植物基准如下:二次通畅率78.9%;截肢率24.3%;感染率8.4%;死亡率3.4%:在民用和实际军事环境中进行的两项单臂试验结果表明,ATEV 在通畅性、肢体挽救和抗感染方面具有优势。将 ATEV 的疗效与合成移植物的基准进行比较后发现,治疗四肢急性血管损伤的效果更好:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers:NCT03005418、NCT05873959。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioengineered Human Arteries for the Repair of Vascular Injuries.

Importance: Vascular injuries require urgent repair to minimize loss of limb and life. Standard revascularization relies on autologous vein or synthetic grafts, but alternative options are needed when adequate vein is not feasible and when clinical conditions preclude safe use of synthetic materials.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of the acellular tissue engineered vessel (ATEV) in the repair of arterial injuries.

Design, setting, and participants: Two open-label, single-arm, nonrandomized clinical trials, including 1 prospective civilian study (CLN-PRO-V005 [V005]) and 1 retrospective observational study in a war zone (CLN-PRO-V017 [V017]), were conducted from September 2018 to January 2024 (follow-up ongoing) at 19 level 1 trauma centers in the US and Israel and 5 frontline hospitals in Ukraine. Patients had vascular injury, no autologous vein available for emergent revascularization, and risk factors for wound infection. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to January 2024.

Intervention: The ATEV is a bioengineered vascular conduit grown from human vascular cells, available off the shelf, and implantable without immunosuppression.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary patency at day 30 was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included limb salvage, graft infection, and patient survival. A systematic literature review identified synthetic graft benchmarks in the treatment of arterial trauma for the same end points.

Results: The V005 and V017 studies evaluated 69 and 17 patients, respectively, and included 51 in V005 and 16 in V017 with noniatrogenic arterial injuries of the extremities. The majority were male (V005, 38 [74.5%]; V017, 16 [100%]), the mean (SD) ages were similar (V005, 33.5 [13.6] years; V017, 34.2 [9.0] years), and the mean (SD) Injury Severity Scores were similar (V005, 20.8 [10.5]; V017, 20.1 [18.9]). Penetrating injuries dominated (V005, 29 patients [56.9%]; V017, 14 patients [87.5%]). At day 30 for the V005 and V017 trials, respectively, ATEV primary patency was 84.3% (95% CI, 72.0%-91.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); secondary patency was 90.2% (95% CI, 79.0%-95.7%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 71.7%-98.9%); amputation rate was 9.8% (95% CI, 4.3%-21.0%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); ATEV infection rate was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.4%-10.3%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%); and death rate was 5.9% (95% CI, 2.0%-15.9%) and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-19.4%) (no deaths attributed to the ATEV). Day 30 synthetic graft benchmarks were as follows: secondary patency, 78.9%; amputation, 24.3%; infection, 8.4%; and death, 3.4%.

Conclusions and relevance: Results of 2 single-arm trials in civilian and real-world military settings suggest that the ATEV provides benefits in terms of patency, limb salvage, and infection resistance. Comparing ATEV outcomes with synthetic graft benchmarks demonstrates improved outcomes in the treatment of acute vascular injuries of the extremities.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03005418, NCT05873959.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信