通过脑电图监测不同年龄组麻醉深度的最佳指标。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Feixiang Li, Bingqing Gong, Huaichen Sheng, Zichen Song, Yonghao Yu, Yongyan Yang
{"title":"通过脑电图监测不同年龄组麻醉深度的最佳指标。","authors":"Feixiang Li, Bingqing Gong, Huaichen Sheng, Zichen Song, Yonghao Yu, Yongyan Yang","doi":"10.1080/00207454.2024.2432893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionCurrent electroencephalogram (EEG) indices for monitoring the depth of anesthesia have not been adjusted for age. This study aims to identify the most suitable EEG indices for monitoring anesthesia depth across different age groups.MethodIn here, we conducted a prospective observational trial to observe whether different EEG features in different age groups can detect anesthesia depth and compare their performance.ResultsIn Group 1, absolute θ had the highest prediction probability (Pk) value (0.78 ± 0.07), while relative γ had the lowest relative coefficient of variation (CV) value in states 1 (0.160), 2 (0.153), 3 (0.214), and 4 (0.144). In Group 2, absolute θ had the highest Pk value (0.81 ± 0.09), and relative γ had the lowest CV value in states 1 (0.159), 2 (0.178), 3 (0.140), and 4 (0.095). In Group 3, absolute δ had the highest Pk value (0.79 ± 0.08), with absolute slow wave having the lowest CV value in states 1 (0.196), 2 (0.258), 3 (0.295), and 4 (0.181). In Group 4, absolute δ had the highest Pk value (0.75 ± 0.10), and absolute slow wave had the lowest CV value in states 1 (0.176), 2 (0.192), 3 (0.185), and 4 (0.144).ConclusionsIn this study, we found that absolute θ and relative γ are the most suitable choices for young and middle-aged patients, while absolute δ and absolute slow wave are the most suitable choices for young elderly and elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14161,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The best indices of anesthesia depth monitored by electroencephalogram in different age groups.\",\"authors\":\"Feixiang Li, Bingqing Gong, Huaichen Sheng, Zichen Song, Yonghao Yu, Yongyan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207454.2024.2432893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionCurrent electroencephalogram (EEG) indices for monitoring the depth of anesthesia have not been adjusted for age. This study aims to identify the most suitable EEG indices for monitoring anesthesia depth across different age groups.MethodIn here, we conducted a prospective observational trial to observe whether different EEG features in different age groups can detect anesthesia depth and compare their performance.ResultsIn Group 1, absolute θ had the highest prediction probability (Pk) value (0.78 ± 0.07), while relative γ had the lowest relative coefficient of variation (CV) value in states 1 (0.160), 2 (0.153), 3 (0.214), and 4 (0.144). In Group 2, absolute θ had the highest Pk value (0.81 ± 0.09), and relative γ had the lowest CV value in states 1 (0.159), 2 (0.178), 3 (0.140), and 4 (0.095). In Group 3, absolute δ had the highest Pk value (0.79 ± 0.08), with absolute slow wave having the lowest CV value in states 1 (0.196), 2 (0.258), 3 (0.295), and 4 (0.181). In Group 4, absolute δ had the highest Pk value (0.75 ± 0.10), and absolute slow wave had the lowest CV value in states 1 (0.176), 2 (0.192), 3 (0.185), and 4 (0.144).ConclusionsIn this study, we found that absolute θ and relative γ are the most suitable choices for young and middle-aged patients, while absolute δ and absolute slow wave are the most suitable choices for young elderly and elderly patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2024.2432893\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2024.2432893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言目前用于监测麻醉深度的脑电图(EEG)指数尚未根据年龄进行调整。方法在本研究中,我们进行了一项前瞻性观察试验,观察不同年龄组的不同脑电图特征是否能检测麻醉深度,并比较其性能。结果在第一组中,绝对θ的预测概率(Pk)值最高(0.78 ± 0.07),而相对γ在状态 1(0.160)、2(0.153)、3(0.214)和 4(0.144)时的相对变异系数(CV)值最低。在第 2 组中,绝对 θ 的 Pk 值最高(0.81 ± 0.09),相对 γ 在状态 1(0.159)、2(0.178)、3(0.140)和 4(0.095)时的 CV 值最低。在第 3 组中,绝对 δ 的 Pk 值最高(0.79 ± 0.08),绝对慢波在状态 1(0.196)、2(0.258)、3(0.295)和 4(0.181)时的 CV 值最低。在第 4 组中,绝对δ的 Pk 值最高(0.75 ± 0.10),绝对慢波在第 1(0.176)、2(0.192)、3(0.185)和 4(0.144)种状态下的 CV 值最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The best indices of anesthesia depth monitored by electroencephalogram in different age groups.

IntroductionCurrent electroencephalogram (EEG) indices for monitoring the depth of anesthesia have not been adjusted for age. This study aims to identify the most suitable EEG indices for monitoring anesthesia depth across different age groups.MethodIn here, we conducted a prospective observational trial to observe whether different EEG features in different age groups can detect anesthesia depth and compare their performance.ResultsIn Group 1, absolute θ had the highest prediction probability (Pk) value (0.78 ± 0.07), while relative γ had the lowest relative coefficient of variation (CV) value in states 1 (0.160), 2 (0.153), 3 (0.214), and 4 (0.144). In Group 2, absolute θ had the highest Pk value (0.81 ± 0.09), and relative γ had the lowest CV value in states 1 (0.159), 2 (0.178), 3 (0.140), and 4 (0.095). In Group 3, absolute δ had the highest Pk value (0.79 ± 0.08), with absolute slow wave having the lowest CV value in states 1 (0.196), 2 (0.258), 3 (0.295), and 4 (0.181). In Group 4, absolute δ had the highest Pk value (0.75 ± 0.10), and absolute slow wave had the lowest CV value in states 1 (0.176), 2 (0.192), 3 (0.185), and 4 (0.144).ConclusionsIn this study, we found that absolute θ and relative γ are the most suitable choices for young and middle-aged patients, while absolute δ and absolute slow wave are the most suitable choices for young elderly and elderly patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Neuroscience publishes original research articles, reviews, brief scientific reports, case studies, letters to the editor and book reviews concerned with problems of the nervous system and related clinical studies, epidemiology, neuropathology, medical and surgical treatment options and outcomes, neuropsychology and other topics related to the research and care of persons with neurologic disorders.  The focus of the journal is clinical and transitional research. Topics covered include but are not limited to: ALS, ataxia, autism, brain tumors, child neurology, demyelinating diseases, epilepsy, genetics, headache, lysosomal storage disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, myopathy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular disorders, neuropharmacology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, pain, sleep disorders, stroke, and other areas related to the neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信