Huaye Lu, Xiaoyang Shi, Lei Han, Xin Liu, Qingtao Jiang
{"title":"镍暴露与糖尿病风险之间的关系:观察性研究的最新荟萃分析。","authors":"Huaye Lu, Xiaoyang Shi, Lei Han, Xin Liu, Qingtao Jiang","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1463880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The results of epidemiological studies on the association between nickel exposure and diabetes remain controversial. Therefore, an update meta-analysis was conducted to examine the association between urinary nickel levels and diabetes risk, and to focus on whether there is an association between blood nickel levels and diabetes risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were comprehensively searched from PubMed, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases from their inception to July 2024. The random-effects model was utilized to determine pooled Standard Mean Difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with stratified and sensitivity analyses also performed. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's and Begg's tests. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 studies involving 46,071 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The random-effects model indicated that the pooled SMD for nickel exposure levels in diabetic patients and non-diabetic controls were 0.16 (95% CI 0.07-0.2) for urine and 0.03 (95% CI -0.20 to 0.27) for blood, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was discovered that diabetes risk was positively correlated with urinary nickel levels, whereas there was no significant correlation with blood nickel levels. Furthermore, it appeared that the association between nickel exposure and diabetes risk differ in individuals with diabetes compared to those with pre-diabetes, and that the direction of the correlation may even be reversed. In conclusion, more high-quality prospective studies are needed in order to validate these findings in future research endeavors.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42024534139.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1463880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between nickel exposure and diabetes risk: an updated meta-analysis of observational studies.\",\"authors\":\"Huaye Lu, Xiaoyang Shi, Lei Han, Xin Liu, Qingtao Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1463880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The results of epidemiological studies on the association between nickel exposure and diabetes remain controversial. Therefore, an update meta-analysis was conducted to examine the association between urinary nickel levels and diabetes risk, and to focus on whether there is an association between blood nickel levels and diabetes risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were comprehensively searched from PubMed, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases from their inception to July 2024. The random-effects model was utilized to determine pooled Standard Mean Difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with stratified and sensitivity analyses also performed. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's and Begg's tests. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 studies involving 46,071 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The random-effects model indicated that the pooled SMD for nickel exposure levels in diabetic patients and non-diabetic controls were 0.16 (95% CI 0.07-0.2) for urine and 0.03 (95% CI -0.20 to 0.27) for blood, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was discovered that diabetes risk was positively correlated with urinary nickel levels, whereas there was no significant correlation with blood nickel levels. Furthermore, it appeared that the association between nickel exposure and diabetes risk differ in individuals with diabetes compared to those with pre-diabetes, and that the direction of the correlation may even be reversed. In conclusion, more high-quality prospective studies are needed in order to validate these findings in future research endeavors.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42024534139.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1463880\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574963/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1463880\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1463880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:关于镍暴露与糖尿病之间关系的流行病学研究结果仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项最新的荟萃分析,研究尿镍水平与糖尿病风险之间的关系,并重点关注血镍水平与糖尿病风险之间是否存在关联:方法:从PubMed、Web of Science和万方数据库中全面检索了从开始到2024年7月的相关研究。利用随机效应模型确定了汇总的标准均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI),并进行了分层分析和敏感性分析。研究之间的异质性采用I 2统计量进行评估,发表偏倚采用Egger检验和Begg检验进行评估。纳入研究的质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估:本次荟萃分析共纳入了 19 项研究,涉及 46,071 名参与者。随机效应模型显示,糖尿病患者和非糖尿病对照组镍暴露水平的集合 SMD 分别为:尿液 0.16(95% CI 0.07-0.2),血液 0.03(95% CI -0.20-0.27):结论:研究发现,糖尿病风险与尿镍水平呈正相关,而与血镍水平无明显关联。此外,与糖尿病前期患者相比,糖尿病患者的镍暴露与糖尿病风险之间似乎存在差异,相关性的方向甚至可能相反。总之,需要进行更多高质量的前瞻性研究,以便在未来的研究工作中验证这些发现。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO,注册号:CRD4202453413:CRD42024534139。
Association between nickel exposure and diabetes risk: an updated meta-analysis of observational studies.
Objective: The results of epidemiological studies on the association between nickel exposure and diabetes remain controversial. Therefore, an update meta-analysis was conducted to examine the association between urinary nickel levels and diabetes risk, and to focus on whether there is an association between blood nickel levels and diabetes risk.
Methods: Relevant studies were comprehensively searched from PubMed, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases from their inception to July 2024. The random-effects model was utilized to determine pooled Standard Mean Difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with stratified and sensitivity analyses also performed. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using I2 statistic, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's and Begg's tests. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Results: A total of 19 studies involving 46,071 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The random-effects model indicated that the pooled SMD for nickel exposure levels in diabetic patients and non-diabetic controls were 0.16 (95% CI 0.07-0.2) for urine and 0.03 (95% CI -0.20 to 0.27) for blood, respectively.
Conclusion: It was discovered that diabetes risk was positively correlated with urinary nickel levels, whereas there was no significant correlation with blood nickel levels. Furthermore, it appeared that the association between nickel exposure and diabetes risk differ in individuals with diabetes compared to those with pre-diabetes, and that the direction of the correlation may even be reversed. In conclusion, more high-quality prospective studies are needed in order to validate these findings in future research endeavors.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice.
Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.