移植类型不同,粒细胞集落刺激因子对成人急性髓性白血病异基因造血细胞移植结果的影响也不同。

IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Takaaki Konuma, Kazuaki Kameda, Kaoru Morita, Tadakazu Kondo, Fumihiko Kimura, Hideki Nakasone, Fumihiko Ouchi, Naoyuki Uchida, Masatsugu Tanaka, Tetsuya Nishida, Takahiro Fukuda, Yuta Hasegawa, Mamiko Sakata-Yanagimoto, Makoto Onizuka, Masashi Sawa, Shuichi Ota, Noboru Asada, Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara, Satoshi Yoshihara, Fumihiko Ishimaru, Makoto Yoshimitsu, Yoshinobu Kanda, Marie Ohbiki, Yoshiko Atsuta, Masamitsu Yanada
{"title":"移植类型不同,粒细胞集落刺激因子对成人急性髓性白血病异基因造血细胞移植结果的影响也不同。","authors":"Takaaki Konuma, Kazuaki Kameda, Kaoru Morita, Tadakazu Kondo, Fumihiko Kimura, Hideki Nakasone, Fumihiko Ouchi, Naoyuki Uchida, Masatsugu Tanaka, Tetsuya Nishida, Takahiro Fukuda, Yuta Hasegawa, Mamiko Sakata-Yanagimoto, Makoto Onizuka, Masashi Sawa, Shuichi Ota, Noboru Asada, Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara, Satoshi Yoshihara, Fumihiko Ishimaru, Makoto Yoshimitsu, Yoshinobu Kanda, Marie Ohbiki, Yoshiko Atsuta, Masamitsu Yanada","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We retrospectively evaluated the impacts of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and its timing on posttransplant outcomes for 9766 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) between 2013 and 2022 using a Japanese database. We separately evaluated three distinct cohorts based on graft type: 3248 received bone marrow transplantation (BMT), 3066 received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), and 3452 received single-unit cord blood transplantation (CBT). Multivariate analysis showed that G-CSF administration significantly accelerated neutrophil recovery after BMT, PBSCT, and CBT. However, it was associated with a higher risk of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) across all graft types. Moreover, an increased incidence of overall chronic GVHD was observed with G-CSF administration in BMT and CBT patients, but not in PBSCT patients. G-CSF administration significantly improved overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) only following CBT. Regarding the timing of G-CSF, in comparison with late initiation of G-CSF (Days 5-10), early initiation (Days 0-4) did not provide benefits for hematopoietic recovery regardless of graft type. In contrast, late initiation was significantly associated with a lower risk of grades II-IV acute GVHD and better OS and LFS in CBT patients. These data demonstrated that G-CSF administration accelerated neutrophil recovery and increased the risk of grades II-IV acute GVHD across all graft types, but significantly improved survival outcomes but only following CBT. Therefore, routine use of G-CSF should be considered for CBT in adult patients with AML.</p>","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different impacts of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes for adult acute myeloid leukemia according to graft type.\",\"authors\":\"Takaaki Konuma, Kazuaki Kameda, Kaoru Morita, Tadakazu Kondo, Fumihiko Kimura, Hideki Nakasone, Fumihiko Ouchi, Naoyuki Uchida, Masatsugu Tanaka, Tetsuya Nishida, Takahiro Fukuda, Yuta Hasegawa, Mamiko Sakata-Yanagimoto, Makoto Onizuka, Masashi Sawa, Shuichi Ota, Noboru Asada, Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara, Satoshi Yoshihara, Fumihiko Ishimaru, Makoto Yoshimitsu, Yoshinobu Kanda, Marie Ohbiki, Yoshiko Atsuta, Masamitsu Yanada\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajh.27521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We retrospectively evaluated the impacts of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and its timing on posttransplant outcomes for 9766 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) between 2013 and 2022 using a Japanese database. We separately evaluated three distinct cohorts based on graft type: 3248 received bone marrow transplantation (BMT), 3066 received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), and 3452 received single-unit cord blood transplantation (CBT). Multivariate analysis showed that G-CSF administration significantly accelerated neutrophil recovery after BMT, PBSCT, and CBT. However, it was associated with a higher risk of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) across all graft types. Moreover, an increased incidence of overall chronic GVHD was observed with G-CSF administration in BMT and CBT patients, but not in PBSCT patients. G-CSF administration significantly improved overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) only following CBT. Regarding the timing of G-CSF, in comparison with late initiation of G-CSF (Days 5-10), early initiation (Days 0-4) did not provide benefits for hematopoietic recovery regardless of graft type. In contrast, late initiation was significantly associated with a lower risk of grades II-IV acute GVHD and better OS and LFS in CBT patients. These data demonstrated that G-CSF administration accelerated neutrophil recovery and increased the risk of grades II-IV acute GVHD across all graft types, but significantly improved survival outcomes but only following CBT. Therefore, routine use of G-CSF should be considered for CBT in adult patients with AML.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27521\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27521","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用日本数据库回顾性评估了 2013 年至 2022 年间 9766 例急性髓性白血病(AML)成人患者使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)及其时机对移植后预后的影响。我们根据移植类型分别评估了三个不同的队列:3248人接受了骨髓移植(BMT),3066人接受了外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT),3452人接受了单份脐带血移植(CBT)。多变量分析显示,在BMT、PBSCT和CBT后,G-CSF能明显加快中性粒细胞的恢复。然而,在所有移植类型中,G-CSF 与Ⅱ-Ⅳ级急性移植物抗宿主疾病(GVHD)的较高风险相关。此外,在 BMT 和 CBT 患者中,G-CSF 会增加总体慢性 GVHD 的发生率,而在 PBSCT 患者中则不会。G-CSF的应用仅能明显改善CBT患者的总生存期(OS)和无白血病生存期(LFS)。关于 G-CSF 的使用时机,与晚用(第 5-10 天)相比,无论移植物类型如何,早用(第 0-4 天)对造血功能恢复都没有益处。与此相反,晚期开始使用 G-CSF 与 CBT 患者发生 II-IV 级急性 GVHD 的风险较低以及较好的 OS 和 LFS 显著相关。这些数据表明,在所有移植物类型中,G-CSF 的应用都会加速中性粒细胞的恢复并增加 II-IV 级急性 GVHD 的风险,但却能显著改善生存预后,但仅限于 CBT 患者。因此,应考虑在急性髓细胞性白血病成人患者的 CBT 中常规使用 G-CSF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different impacts of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes for adult acute myeloid leukemia according to graft type.

We retrospectively evaluated the impacts of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and its timing on posttransplant outcomes for 9766 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) between 2013 and 2022 using a Japanese database. We separately evaluated three distinct cohorts based on graft type: 3248 received bone marrow transplantation (BMT), 3066 received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), and 3452 received single-unit cord blood transplantation (CBT). Multivariate analysis showed that G-CSF administration significantly accelerated neutrophil recovery after BMT, PBSCT, and CBT. However, it was associated with a higher risk of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) across all graft types. Moreover, an increased incidence of overall chronic GVHD was observed with G-CSF administration in BMT and CBT patients, but not in PBSCT patients. G-CSF administration significantly improved overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) only following CBT. Regarding the timing of G-CSF, in comparison with late initiation of G-CSF (Days 5-10), early initiation (Days 0-4) did not provide benefits for hematopoietic recovery regardless of graft type. In contrast, late initiation was significantly associated with a lower risk of grades II-IV acute GVHD and better OS and LFS in CBT patients. These data demonstrated that G-CSF administration accelerated neutrophil recovery and increased the risk of grades II-IV acute GVHD across all graft types, but significantly improved survival outcomes but only following CBT. Therefore, routine use of G-CSF should be considered for CBT in adult patients with AML.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hematology offers extensive coverage of experimental and clinical aspects of blood diseases in humans and animal models. The journal publishes original contributions in both non-malignant and malignant hematological diseases, encompassing clinical and basic studies in areas such as hemostasis, thrombosis, immunology, blood banking, and stem cell biology. Clinical translational reports highlighting innovative therapeutic approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases are actively encouraged.The American Journal of Hematology features regular original laboratory and clinical research articles, brief research reports, critical reviews, images in hematology, as well as letters and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信