以赤泥为碱活化剂的混合碱活性水泥生产的生命周期评估。

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Qinli Zhang, Cunyu Zhao, Yan Feng, Qiusong Chen
{"title":"以赤泥为碱活化剂的混合碱活性水泥生产的生命周期评估。","authors":"Qinli Zhang, Cunyu Zhao, Yan Feng, Qiusong Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11356-024-35327-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The production of hybrid alkali-activated cement (HAAC) has generated considerable interest in environmental issues. In this research, the environmental impacts of utilizing red mud (RM) as a partial activator of alkali-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) in HAAC production have been evaluated. A contribution analysis was carried out using life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess the environmental significance of six important substances in HAAC production. A comparative analysis of the environmental consequences of producing ordinary portland cement (OPC) and two HAACs using various activators in the same plant was conducted. The results showed that the calcination and preparation of alkali-activated cementitious materials are the two processes with the highest environmental impacts. Marine ecotoxicity was identified as the primary impact category, followed by freshwater ecotoxicity and fossil depletion. HAAC provides better benefits than OPC in most environmental impact categories. Additionally, the inclusion of RM as a partial alkali activator to HAAC results in even more pronounced environmental benefits when compared to NaOH alone, particularly in terms of cleaner production areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment of hybrid alkali-activated cement production with red mud as an alkali activator.\",\"authors\":\"Qinli Zhang, Cunyu Zhao, Yan Feng, Qiusong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11356-024-35327-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The production of hybrid alkali-activated cement (HAAC) has generated considerable interest in environmental issues. In this research, the environmental impacts of utilizing red mud (RM) as a partial activator of alkali-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) in HAAC production have been evaluated. A contribution analysis was carried out using life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess the environmental significance of six important substances in HAAC production. A comparative analysis of the environmental consequences of producing ordinary portland cement (OPC) and two HAACs using various activators in the same plant was conducted. The results showed that the calcination and preparation of alkali-activated cementitious materials are the two processes with the highest environmental impacts. Marine ecotoxicity was identified as the primary impact category, followed by freshwater ecotoxicity and fossil depletion. HAAC provides better benefits than OPC in most environmental impact categories. Additionally, the inclusion of RM as a partial alkali activator to HAAC results in even more pronounced environmental benefits when compared to NaOH alone, particularly in terms of cleaner production areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35327-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35327-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混合碱活性水泥(HAAC)的生产引起了人们对环境问题的极大关注。在这项研究中,评估了利用赤泥(RM)作为碱活性磨细高炉矿渣(GBFS)的部分活化剂在HAAC生产中对环境的影响。利用生命周期评估(LCA)进行了贡献分析,评估了 HAAC 生产中六种重要物质的环境意义。对同一工厂使用不同活化剂生产普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)和两种 HAAC 的环境后果进行了比较分析。结果表明,煅烧和制备碱活性胶凝材料是对环境影响最大的两个过程。海洋生态毒性被确定为主要影响类别,其次是淡水生态毒性和化石损耗。在大多数环境影响类别中,HAAC 比 OPC 具有更好的效益。此外,与单独使用 NaOH 相比,在 HAAC 中加入 RM 作为部分碱活化剂会产生更明显的环境效益,特别是在清洁生产区方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Life cycle assessment of hybrid alkali-activated cement production with red mud as an alkali activator.

The production of hybrid alkali-activated cement (HAAC) has generated considerable interest in environmental issues. In this research, the environmental impacts of utilizing red mud (RM) as a partial activator of alkali-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) in HAAC production have been evaluated. A contribution analysis was carried out using life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess the environmental significance of six important substances in HAAC production. A comparative analysis of the environmental consequences of producing ordinary portland cement (OPC) and two HAACs using various activators in the same plant was conducted. The results showed that the calcination and preparation of alkali-activated cementitious materials are the two processes with the highest environmental impacts. Marine ecotoxicity was identified as the primary impact category, followed by freshwater ecotoxicity and fossil depletion. HAAC provides better benefits than OPC in most environmental impact categories. Additionally, the inclusion of RM as a partial alkali activator to HAAC results in even more pronounced environmental benefits when compared to NaOH alone, particularly in terms of cleaner production areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信