为锂集群创建基准并用于测试和验证。

IF 5.7 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01224
Maryam Mansoori Kermani, Donald G Truhlar
{"title":"为锂集群创建基准并用于测试和验证。","authors":"Maryam Mansoori Kermani, Donald G Truhlar","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metal clusters often have a variety of possible structures, and they are calculated by a wide range of methods; however, fully converged benchmarks on the energy differences of structures and spin states that could be used to test or validate these methods are rare or nonexistent. Small lithium clusters are good candidates for such benchmarks to test different methods against well-converged relative energetics for qualitatively different structures because they have a small number of electrons. The present study provides fully converged benchmarks for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub> clusters and uses them to test a diverse group of approximation methods. To create a dataset of well-converged single-point energies for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, stationary structures were optimized by Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT) and then single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by two quite different beyond-CCSD(T) methods. To test other methods single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by KS-DFT, Mo̷ller-Plesset (MP) theory, coupled cluster (CC) theory, five composite methods (Gaussian-4, the Wuhan-Minnesota (WM) composite method, and the W2X, W3X, and W3X-L composite methods of Radom and co-workers), multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT), complete active space second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2), and <i>n</i>-electron valence state second-order perturbation theory (NEVPT2). Our results show that rhomboid and trigonal bipyramid (TBP) geometries are the most stable structures for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, respectively. Using the W3X-L method to obtain our best estimates, the mean unsigned deviations were calculated for other methods for several structures and spin states of both Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>. Binding energies and <i>M</i> diagnostics were calculated for all structures. The data in this paper are valuable for assessing the reliability of current electronic structure theories and also developing new density functionals and machine learned models.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":" ","pages":"10491-10506"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating Benchmarks for Lithium Clusters and Using Them for Testing and Validation.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Mansoori Kermani, Donald G Truhlar\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Metal clusters often have a variety of possible structures, and they are calculated by a wide range of methods; however, fully converged benchmarks on the energy differences of structures and spin states that could be used to test or validate these methods are rare or nonexistent. Small lithium clusters are good candidates for such benchmarks to test different methods against well-converged relative energetics for qualitatively different structures because they have a small number of electrons. The present study provides fully converged benchmarks for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub> clusters and uses them to test a diverse group of approximation methods. To create a dataset of well-converged single-point energies for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, stationary structures were optimized by Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT) and then single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by two quite different beyond-CCSD(T) methods. To test other methods single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by KS-DFT, Mo̷ller-Plesset (MP) theory, coupled cluster (CC) theory, five composite methods (Gaussian-4, the Wuhan-Minnesota (WM) composite method, and the W2X, W3X, and W3X-L composite methods of Radom and co-workers), multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT), complete active space second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2), and <i>n</i>-electron valence state second-order perturbation theory (NEVPT2). Our results show that rhomboid and trigonal bipyramid (TBP) geometries are the most stable structures for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, respectively. Using the W3X-L method to obtain our best estimates, the mean unsigned deviations were calculated for other methods for several structures and spin states of both Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>. Binding energies and <i>M</i> diagnostics were calculated for all structures. The data in this paper are valuable for assessing the reliability of current electronic structure theories and also developing new density functionals and machine learned models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10491-10506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01224\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

金属簇通常有多种可能的结构,计算方法也多种多样;然而,可用于测试或验证这些方法的结构和自旋态能量差异的完全收敛基准却很少或根本不存在。小锂簇是此类基准的良好候选者,因为它们的电子数较少,所以可以根据收敛良好的相对能量来测试不同方法的定性不同结构。本研究为锂4和锂5簇提供了完全收敛的基准,并用它们来测试一组不同的近似方法。为了创建一个收敛性良好的 Li4 和 Li5 单点能量数据集,先用 Kohn-Sham 密度泛函理论(KS-DFT)对静态结构进行了优化,然后用两种截然不同的超越-CSD(T) 方法对这些结构进行了单点能量计算。为了测试其他方法,还采用了 KS-DFT、Mo̷ller-Plesset(MP)理论、耦合簇(CC)理论、五种复合方法(Gaussian-4、武汉-明尼苏达(WM)复合方法和 W2X、W3X 和 W3X)对这些结构进行了单点能计算、W3X和W3X-L复合方法)、多构型对密度泛函理论(MC-PDFT)、完全有源空间二阶扰动理论(CASPT2)和正电子价态二阶扰动理论(NEVPT2)。结果表明,斜方体和三叉双锥体(TBP)几何结构分别是 Li4 和 Li5 最稳定的结构。我们使用 W3X-L 方法获得了最佳估计值,并针对 Li4 和 Li5 的几种结构和自旋态计算了其他方法的平均无符号偏差。对所有结构都计算了结合能和 M 诊断。本文中的数据对于评估当前电子结构理论的可靠性以及开发新的密度函数和机器学习模型非常有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creating Benchmarks for Lithium Clusters and Using Them for Testing and Validation.

Metal clusters often have a variety of possible structures, and they are calculated by a wide range of methods; however, fully converged benchmarks on the energy differences of structures and spin states that could be used to test or validate these methods are rare or nonexistent. Small lithium clusters are good candidates for such benchmarks to test different methods against well-converged relative energetics for qualitatively different structures because they have a small number of electrons. The present study provides fully converged benchmarks for Li4 and Li5 clusters and uses them to test a diverse group of approximation methods. To create a dataset of well-converged single-point energies for Li4 and Li5, stationary structures were optimized by Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT) and then single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by two quite different beyond-CCSD(T) methods. To test other methods single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by KS-DFT, Mo̷ller-Plesset (MP) theory, coupled cluster (CC) theory, five composite methods (Gaussian-4, the Wuhan-Minnesota (WM) composite method, and the W2X, W3X, and W3X-L composite methods of Radom and co-workers), multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT), complete active space second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2), and n-electron valence state second-order perturbation theory (NEVPT2). Our results show that rhomboid and trigonal bipyramid (TBP) geometries are the most stable structures for Li4 and Li5, respectively. Using the W3X-L method to obtain our best estimates, the mean unsigned deviations were calculated for other methods for several structures and spin states of both Li4 and Li5. Binding energies and M diagnostics were calculated for all structures. The data in this paper are valuable for assessing the reliability of current electronic structure theories and also developing new density functionals and machine learned models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信