{"title":"为锂集群创建基准并用于测试和验证。","authors":"Maryam Mansoori Kermani, Donald G Truhlar","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metal clusters often have a variety of possible structures, and they are calculated by a wide range of methods; however, fully converged benchmarks on the energy differences of structures and spin states that could be used to test or validate these methods are rare or nonexistent. Small lithium clusters are good candidates for such benchmarks to test different methods against well-converged relative energetics for qualitatively different structures because they have a small number of electrons. The present study provides fully converged benchmarks for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub> clusters and uses them to test a diverse group of approximation methods. To create a dataset of well-converged single-point energies for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, stationary structures were optimized by Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT) and then single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by two quite different beyond-CCSD(T) methods. To test other methods single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by KS-DFT, Mo̷ller-Plesset (MP) theory, coupled cluster (CC) theory, five composite methods (Gaussian-4, the Wuhan-Minnesota (WM) composite method, and the W2X, W3X, and W3X-L composite methods of Radom and co-workers), multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT), complete active space second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2), and <i>n</i>-electron valence state second-order perturbation theory (NEVPT2). Our results show that rhomboid and trigonal bipyramid (TBP) geometries are the most stable structures for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, respectively. Using the W3X-L method to obtain our best estimates, the mean unsigned deviations were calculated for other methods for several structures and spin states of both Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>. Binding energies and <i>M</i> diagnostics were calculated for all structures. The data in this paper are valuable for assessing the reliability of current electronic structure theories and also developing new density functionals and machine learned models.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":" ","pages":"10491-10506"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating Benchmarks for Lithium Clusters and Using Them for Testing and Validation.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Mansoori Kermani, Donald G Truhlar\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Metal clusters often have a variety of possible structures, and they are calculated by a wide range of methods; however, fully converged benchmarks on the energy differences of structures and spin states that could be used to test or validate these methods are rare or nonexistent. Small lithium clusters are good candidates for such benchmarks to test different methods against well-converged relative energetics for qualitatively different structures because they have a small number of electrons. The present study provides fully converged benchmarks for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub> clusters and uses them to test a diverse group of approximation methods. To create a dataset of well-converged single-point energies for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, stationary structures were optimized by Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT) and then single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by two quite different beyond-CCSD(T) methods. To test other methods single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by KS-DFT, Mo̷ller-Plesset (MP) theory, coupled cluster (CC) theory, five composite methods (Gaussian-4, the Wuhan-Minnesota (WM) composite method, and the W2X, W3X, and W3X-L composite methods of Radom and co-workers), multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT), complete active space second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2), and <i>n</i>-electron valence state second-order perturbation theory (NEVPT2). Our results show that rhomboid and trigonal bipyramid (TBP) geometries are the most stable structures for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, respectively. Using the W3X-L method to obtain our best estimates, the mean unsigned deviations were calculated for other methods for several structures and spin states of both Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>. Binding energies and <i>M</i> diagnostics were calculated for all structures. The data in this paper are valuable for assessing the reliability of current electronic structure theories and also developing new density functionals and machine learned models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10491-10506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01224\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Creating Benchmarks for Lithium Clusters and Using Them for Testing and Validation.
Metal clusters often have a variety of possible structures, and they are calculated by a wide range of methods; however, fully converged benchmarks on the energy differences of structures and spin states that could be used to test or validate these methods are rare or nonexistent. Small lithium clusters are good candidates for such benchmarks to test different methods against well-converged relative energetics for qualitatively different structures because they have a small number of electrons. The present study provides fully converged benchmarks for Li4 and Li5 clusters and uses them to test a diverse group of approximation methods. To create a dataset of well-converged single-point energies for Li4 and Li5, stationary structures were optimized by Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT) and then single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by two quite different beyond-CCSD(T) methods. To test other methods single-point energy calculations at these structures were carried out by KS-DFT, Mo̷ller-Plesset (MP) theory, coupled cluster (CC) theory, five composite methods (Gaussian-4, the Wuhan-Minnesota (WM) composite method, and the W2X, W3X, and W3X-L composite methods of Radom and co-workers), multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT), complete active space second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2), and n-electron valence state second-order perturbation theory (NEVPT2). Our results show that rhomboid and trigonal bipyramid (TBP) geometries are the most stable structures for Li4 and Li5, respectively. Using the W3X-L method to obtain our best estimates, the mean unsigned deviations were calculated for other methods for several structures and spin states of both Li4 and Li5. Binding energies and M diagnostics were calculated for all structures. The data in this paper are valuable for assessing the reliability of current electronic structure theories and also developing new density functionals and machine learned models.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.