对 "呋喃、吡咯和噻吩中的化学键合和芳香性:磁屏蔽研究 "的更正

IF 3.3 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC
Kate E. Horner, Peter B. Karadakov
{"title":"对 \"呋喃、吡咯和噻吩中的化学键合和芳香性:磁屏蔽研究 \"的更正","authors":"Kate E. Horner, Peter B. Karadakov","doi":"10.1021/acs.joc.4c02794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The NICS(0), NICS(0.5), and NICS(1) values in our paper were taken from the data used to construct the isotropic shielding contour plots for furan, pyrrole, and thiophene shown in Figures 1–6, at the points with coordinates (0.0, 0.0, 0.0), (0.0, 0.0, 0.5), and (0.0, 0.0, 1.0) (in angstroms; the <i>x</i> and <i>y</i> coordinates are along the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively, in Figures 1a–3a). These points are shifted from the geometric ring centers along the respective <i>y</i> axes; to follow the convention for calculating NICS, separate NICS(0), NICS(0.5), and NICS(1) calculations should have been performed at the points with coordinates corresponding to the exact geometric ring centers, (0.0, −0.01277, 0.0), (0.0, −0.01277, 0.5), and (0.0, −0.01277, 1.0) for furan, (0.0, −0.03584, 0.0), (0.0, −0.03584, 0.5), and (0.0, −0.03584, 1.0) for pyrrole, and (0.0, −0.27121, 0.0), (0.0, −0.27121, 0.5), and (0.0, −0.27121, 1.0) for thiophene. The correct NICS(0), NICS(0.5), and NICS(1) values for the three molecules are shown in the corrected Table 1 (all nuclear shieldings remain unchanged). The changes to the NICS values for furan and pyrrole are relatively minor, but the changes to the NICS values for thiophene are more substantial. The correct HF-GIAO NICS(1), MP2-GIAO NICS(0.5), and MP2-GIAO NICS(1) values still indicate that thiophene is more aromatic than pyrrole, but the correct HF-GIAO NICS(0), HF-GIAO NICS(0.5), and MP2-GIAO NICS(0) values make the opposite suggestion. It is important to emphasize that the analysis of the behavior of the isotropic shielding in molecular space illustrated by the contour plots in Figures 1–6 that employs considerably more data than single-point NICS calculations strongly favors the aromaticity order thiophene &gt; pyrrole &gt; furan supported by experimental evidence. The authors thank Emiel Vanden Berghe (Ph.D. researcher in the group of Patrick Bultinck, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium) who carried out HF-GIAO NICS(0) and NICS(1) calculations at the geometries of furan, pyrrole, and thiophene used in the paper and informed us of discrepancies with the published results. C<sub>1</sub> is the carbon adjacent to heteroatom Z. This article has not yet been cited by other publications.","PeriodicalId":57,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Organic Chemistry","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to “Chemical Bonding and Aromaticity in Furan, Pyrrole, and Thiophene: A Magnetic Shielding Study”\",\"authors\":\"Kate E. Horner, Peter B. Karadakov\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.joc.4c02794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The NICS(0), NICS(0.5), and NICS(1) values in our paper were taken from the data used to construct the isotropic shielding contour plots for furan, pyrrole, and thiophene shown in Figures 1–6, at the points with coordinates (0.0, 0.0, 0.0), (0.0, 0.0, 0.5), and (0.0, 0.0, 1.0) (in angstroms; the <i>x</i> and <i>y</i> coordinates are along the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively, in Figures 1a–3a). These points are shifted from the geometric ring centers along the respective <i>y</i> axes; to follow the convention for calculating NICS, separate NICS(0), NICS(0.5), and NICS(1) calculations should have been performed at the points with coordinates corresponding to the exact geometric ring centers, (0.0, −0.01277, 0.0), (0.0, −0.01277, 0.5), and (0.0, −0.01277, 1.0) for furan, (0.0, −0.03584, 0.0), (0.0, −0.03584, 0.5), and (0.0, −0.03584, 1.0) for pyrrole, and (0.0, −0.27121, 0.0), (0.0, −0.27121, 0.5), and (0.0, −0.27121, 1.0) for thiophene. The correct NICS(0), NICS(0.5), and NICS(1) values for the three molecules are shown in the corrected Table 1 (all nuclear shieldings remain unchanged). The changes to the NICS values for furan and pyrrole are relatively minor, but the changes to the NICS values for thiophene are more substantial. The correct HF-GIAO NICS(1), MP2-GIAO NICS(0.5), and MP2-GIAO NICS(1) values still indicate that thiophene is more aromatic than pyrrole, but the correct HF-GIAO NICS(0), HF-GIAO NICS(0.5), and MP2-GIAO NICS(0) values make the opposite suggestion. It is important to emphasize that the analysis of the behavior of the isotropic shielding in molecular space illustrated by the contour plots in Figures 1–6 that employs considerably more data than single-point NICS calculations strongly favors the aromaticity order thiophene &gt; pyrrole &gt; furan supported by experimental evidence. The authors thank Emiel Vanden Berghe (Ph.D. researcher in the group of Patrick Bultinck, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium) who carried out HF-GIAO NICS(0) and NICS(1) calculations at the geometries of furan, pyrrole, and thiophene used in the paper and informed us of discrepancies with the published results. C<sub>1</sub> is the carbon adjacent to heteroatom Z. This article has not yet been cited by other publications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":57,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Organic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Organic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.4c02794\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Organic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.4c02794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文中的 NICS(0)、NICS(0.5) 和 NICS(1) 值取自图 1-6 中用于绘制呋喃、吡咯和噻吩的各向同性屏蔽等值线图的数据,这些点的坐标分别为 (0.0,0.0,0.0)、(0.0,0.0,0.5)和(0.0,0.0,1.0)点(单位:埃;x 和 y 坐标分别沿图 1a-3a 中的横轴和纵轴)。这些点沿着各自的 y 轴偏离了几何环中心;为了遵循计算 NICS 的惯例,应该在坐标与确切的几何环中心相对应的点上分别进行 NICS(0)、NICS(0.5) 和 NICS(1) 计算,即 (0.0, -0.01277, 0.0)、(0.0, -0.01277, 0.5)和(0.0, -0.01277, 1.0)的坐标点进行计算,呋喃的坐标点为(0.0, -0.03584, 0.0)、(0.0, -0.03584, 0.5) 和 (0.0, -0.03584, 1.0) 表示吡咯,(0.0, -0.27121, 0.0), (0.0, -0.27121, 0.5) 和 (0.0, -0.27121, 1.0) 表示噻吩。这三种分子的正确 NICS(0)、NICS(0.5) 和 NICS(1) 值见修正后的表 1(所有核屏蔽均保持不变)。呋喃和吡咯的 NICS 值变化相对较小,但噻吩的 NICS 值变化较大。正确的高频-GIAO NICS(1)、MP2-GIAO NICS(0.5) 和 MP2-GIAO NICS(1) 值仍然表明噻吩比吡咯更芳香,但正确的高频-GIAO NICS(0)、高频-GIAO NICS(0.5) 和 MP2-GIAO NICS(0) 值却与之相反。需要强调的是,图 1-6 中的等值线图说明了分子空间中各向同性屏蔽行为的分析,该分析采用的数据比单点 NICS 计算的数据要多得多,这有力地支持了噻吩> 吡咯> 呋喃的芳香顺序,并得到了实验证据的支持。作者感谢 Emiel Vanden Berghe(比利时根特市根特大学 Patrick Bultinck 小组的博士研究员),他在文中使用的呋喃、吡咯和噻吩几何结构上进行了高频-GIAO NICS(0) 和 NICS(1) 计算,并告知我们与已发表结果的差异。C1 是与杂原子 Z 相邻的碳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correction to “Chemical Bonding and Aromaticity in Furan, Pyrrole, and Thiophene: A Magnetic Shielding Study”
The NICS(0), NICS(0.5), and NICS(1) values in our paper were taken from the data used to construct the isotropic shielding contour plots for furan, pyrrole, and thiophene shown in Figures 1–6, at the points with coordinates (0.0, 0.0, 0.0), (0.0, 0.0, 0.5), and (0.0, 0.0, 1.0) (in angstroms; the x and y coordinates are along the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively, in Figures 1a–3a). These points are shifted from the geometric ring centers along the respective y axes; to follow the convention for calculating NICS, separate NICS(0), NICS(0.5), and NICS(1) calculations should have been performed at the points with coordinates corresponding to the exact geometric ring centers, (0.0, −0.01277, 0.0), (0.0, −0.01277, 0.5), and (0.0, −0.01277, 1.0) for furan, (0.0, −0.03584, 0.0), (0.0, −0.03584, 0.5), and (0.0, −0.03584, 1.0) for pyrrole, and (0.0, −0.27121, 0.0), (0.0, −0.27121, 0.5), and (0.0, −0.27121, 1.0) for thiophene. The correct NICS(0), NICS(0.5), and NICS(1) values for the three molecules are shown in the corrected Table 1 (all nuclear shieldings remain unchanged). The changes to the NICS values for furan and pyrrole are relatively minor, but the changes to the NICS values for thiophene are more substantial. The correct HF-GIAO NICS(1), MP2-GIAO NICS(0.5), and MP2-GIAO NICS(1) values still indicate that thiophene is more aromatic than pyrrole, but the correct HF-GIAO NICS(0), HF-GIAO NICS(0.5), and MP2-GIAO NICS(0) values make the opposite suggestion. It is important to emphasize that the analysis of the behavior of the isotropic shielding in molecular space illustrated by the contour plots in Figures 1–6 that employs considerably more data than single-point NICS calculations strongly favors the aromaticity order thiophene > pyrrole > furan supported by experimental evidence. The authors thank Emiel Vanden Berghe (Ph.D. researcher in the group of Patrick Bultinck, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium) who carried out HF-GIAO NICS(0) and NICS(1) calculations at the geometries of furan, pyrrole, and thiophene used in the paper and informed us of discrepancies with the published results. C1 is the carbon adjacent to heteroatom Z. This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
The Journal of Organic Chemistry 化学-有机化学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1467
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organic Chemistry welcomes original contributions of fundamental research in all branches of the theory and practice of organic chemistry. In selecting manuscripts for publication, the editors place emphasis on the quality and novelty of the work, as well as the breadth of interest to the organic chemistry community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信