培育明天:菲律宾农业创新全面回顾(2018-2023 年)

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRONOMY
Erma Taer, Albino Taer
{"title":"培育明天:菲律宾农业创新全面回顾(2018-2023 年)","authors":"Erma Taer,&nbsp;Albino Taer","doi":"10.1007/s40003-024-00803-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic review undertook an examination of agricultural innovations in the Philippines spanning from 2018 to 2023. The objective was to provide a comprehensive categorization, analyze adoption trends, and offer recommendations to optimize research priorities. A methodical approach involving literature search, screening, and quantitative analysis facilitated an organized investigation into various innovation types, contributors, applications, and geographical contexts. The findings indicated that image analysis and sustainable farming systems held the highest shares within the innovation categories, comprising 26% and 23%, respectively. These segments showcased cutting-edge techniques along with a commitment to environmental stewardship. Notably, rice-centric innovations dominated at 33.33%, underscoring the underrepresentation of high-value crops, livestock, and remote farming sectors. However, a geographical bias was evident, with 69.23% of studies concentrating solely on Luzon regions, particularly in central and northern areas. This revealed a need to acknowledge the agricultural potential present in Visayas and Mindanao, emphasizing the necessity for increased research emphasis in these regions. Furthermore, the study unveiled a fragmented landscape in research contributions, with the majority of contributors representing less than a 5% share each. This fragmentation suggests a lack of cross-institutional partnerships, hindering a holistic and collaborative approach to agricultural innovation. Critical gaps in innovation prioritization and adoption levels were identified, particularly in sustainable practices, precision technologies, non-cereal commodities, and geographically disadvantaged communities. Addressing these gaps requires significant institutional support through modernization policies and localized capacity building programs, ideally facilitated by industry-academia partnerships. In conclusion, the establishment of unified innovation transfer conduits is essential to expedite the transition of solutions from proofs of concept to farmer-ready tools, ensuring a targeted approach that caters to regional needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7553,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Research","volume":"13 4","pages":"623 - 635"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultivating Tomorrow: A Comprehensive Review of Agricultural Innovations in the Philippines (2018–2023)\",\"authors\":\"Erma Taer,&nbsp;Albino Taer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40003-024-00803-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This systematic review undertook an examination of agricultural innovations in the Philippines spanning from 2018 to 2023. The objective was to provide a comprehensive categorization, analyze adoption trends, and offer recommendations to optimize research priorities. A methodical approach involving literature search, screening, and quantitative analysis facilitated an organized investigation into various innovation types, contributors, applications, and geographical contexts. The findings indicated that image analysis and sustainable farming systems held the highest shares within the innovation categories, comprising 26% and 23%, respectively. These segments showcased cutting-edge techniques along with a commitment to environmental stewardship. Notably, rice-centric innovations dominated at 33.33%, underscoring the underrepresentation of high-value crops, livestock, and remote farming sectors. However, a geographical bias was evident, with 69.23% of studies concentrating solely on Luzon regions, particularly in central and northern areas. This revealed a need to acknowledge the agricultural potential present in Visayas and Mindanao, emphasizing the necessity for increased research emphasis in these regions. Furthermore, the study unveiled a fragmented landscape in research contributions, with the majority of contributors representing less than a 5% share each. This fragmentation suggests a lack of cross-institutional partnerships, hindering a holistic and collaborative approach to agricultural innovation. Critical gaps in innovation prioritization and adoption levels were identified, particularly in sustainable practices, precision technologies, non-cereal commodities, and geographically disadvantaged communities. Addressing these gaps requires significant institutional support through modernization policies and localized capacity building programs, ideally facilitated by industry-academia partnerships. In conclusion, the establishment of unified innovation transfer conduits is essential to expedite the transition of solutions from proofs of concept to farmer-ready tools, ensuring a targeted approach that caters to regional needs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Research\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"623 - 635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40003-024-00803-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40003-024-00803-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述对菲律宾的农业创新进行了研究,时间跨度为 2018 年至 2023 年。目的是提供一个全面的分类,分析采用趋势,并提出优化研究重点的建议。通过文献检索、筛选和定量分析等方法,对各种创新类型、贡献者、应用和地理环境进行了有组织的调查。研究结果表明,图像分析和可持续农业系统在创新类别中所占比例最高,分别为 26% 和 23%。这些领域展示了尖端技术和对环境管理的承诺。值得注意的是,以水稻为中心的创新占 33.33%,凸显了高价值作物、畜牧业和偏远农业部门的代表性不足。不过,地域偏见也很明显,69.23%的研究仅集中在吕宋地区,尤其是中部和北部地区。这表明有必要认识到米沙鄢和棉兰老的农业潜力,强调有必要加强对这些地区的研究。此外,这项研究还揭示了研究成果分散的状况,大多数研究成果的贡献率均不足 5%。这种分散性表明缺乏跨机构的合作伙伴关系,阻碍了以整体协作的方式进行农业创新。在确定创新的优先次序和采用水平方面发现了重大差距,尤其是在可持续做法、精准技术、非谷物商品和地理位置不利的社区方面。要消除这些差距,需要通过现代化政策和本地化能力建设计划提供大量的机构支持,最好是在产学合作的推动下。总之,必须建立统一的创新转让渠道,以加快解决方案从概念验证到农民可用工具的过渡,确保采取有针对性的方法,满足区域需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cultivating Tomorrow: A Comprehensive Review of Agricultural Innovations in the Philippines (2018–2023)

This systematic review undertook an examination of agricultural innovations in the Philippines spanning from 2018 to 2023. The objective was to provide a comprehensive categorization, analyze adoption trends, and offer recommendations to optimize research priorities. A methodical approach involving literature search, screening, and quantitative analysis facilitated an organized investigation into various innovation types, contributors, applications, and geographical contexts. The findings indicated that image analysis and sustainable farming systems held the highest shares within the innovation categories, comprising 26% and 23%, respectively. These segments showcased cutting-edge techniques along with a commitment to environmental stewardship. Notably, rice-centric innovations dominated at 33.33%, underscoring the underrepresentation of high-value crops, livestock, and remote farming sectors. However, a geographical bias was evident, with 69.23% of studies concentrating solely on Luzon regions, particularly in central and northern areas. This revealed a need to acknowledge the agricultural potential present in Visayas and Mindanao, emphasizing the necessity for increased research emphasis in these regions. Furthermore, the study unveiled a fragmented landscape in research contributions, with the majority of contributors representing less than a 5% share each. This fragmentation suggests a lack of cross-institutional partnerships, hindering a holistic and collaborative approach to agricultural innovation. Critical gaps in innovation prioritization and adoption levels were identified, particularly in sustainable practices, precision technologies, non-cereal commodities, and geographically disadvantaged communities. Addressing these gaps requires significant institutional support through modernization policies and localized capacity building programs, ideally facilitated by industry-academia partnerships. In conclusion, the establishment of unified innovation transfer conduits is essential to expedite the transition of solutions from proofs of concept to farmer-ready tools, ensuring a targeted approach that caters to regional needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The main objective of this initiative is to promote agricultural research and development. The journal will publish high quality original research papers and critical reviews on emerging fields and concepts for providing future directions. The publications will include both applied and basic research covering the following disciplines of agricultural sciences: Genetic resources, genetics and breeding, biotechnology, physiology, biochemistry, management of biotic and abiotic stresses, and nutrition of field crops, horticultural crops, livestock and fishes; agricultural meteorology, environmental sciences, forestry and agro forestry, agronomy, soils and soil management, microbiology, water management, agricultural engineering and technology, agricultural policy, agricultural economics, food nutrition, agricultural statistics, and extension research; impact of climate change and the emerging technologies on agriculture, and the role of agricultural research and innovation for development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信