Felix Holzmeister, Magnus Johannesson, Colin F. Camerer, Yiling Chen, Teck-Hua Ho, Suzanne Hoogeveen, Juergen Huber, Noriko Imai, Taisuke Imai, Lawrence Jin, Michael Kirchler, Alexander Ly, Benjamin Mandl, Dylan Manfredi, Gideon Nave, Brian A. Nosek, Thomas Pfeiffer, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Rene Schwaiger, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Viking Waldén, Anna Dreber
{"title":"检验由决策市场选择的在线实验的可复制性","authors":"Felix Holzmeister, Magnus Johannesson, Colin F. Camerer, Yiling Chen, Teck-Hua Ho, Suzanne Hoogeveen, Juergen Huber, Noriko Imai, Taisuke Imai, Lawrence Jin, Michael Kirchler, Alexander Ly, Benjamin Mandl, Dylan Manfredi, Gideon Nave, Brian A. Nosek, Thomas Pfeiffer, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Rene Schwaiger, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Viking Waldén, Anna Dreber","doi":"10.1038/s41562-024-02062-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Here we test the feasibility of using decision markets to select studies for replication and provide evidence about the replicability of online experiments. Social scientists (<i>n</i> = 162) traded on the outcome of close replications of 41 systematically selected MTurk social science experiments published in PNAS 2015–2018, knowing that the 12 studies with the lowest and the 12 with the highest final market prices would be selected for replication, along with 2 randomly selected studies. The replication rate, based on the statistical significance indicator, was 83% for the top-12 and 33% for the bottom-12 group. Overall, 54% of the studies were successfully replicated, with replication effect size estimates averaging 45% of the original effect size estimates. The replication rate varied between 54% and 62% for alternative replication indicators. The observed replicability of MTurk experiments is comparable to that of previous systematic replication projects involving laboratory experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19074,"journal":{"name":"Nature Human Behaviour","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the replicability of online experiments selected by a decision market\",\"authors\":\"Felix Holzmeister, Magnus Johannesson, Colin F. Camerer, Yiling Chen, Teck-Hua Ho, Suzanne Hoogeveen, Juergen Huber, Noriko Imai, Taisuke Imai, Lawrence Jin, Michael Kirchler, Alexander Ly, Benjamin Mandl, Dylan Manfredi, Gideon Nave, Brian A. Nosek, Thomas Pfeiffer, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Rene Schwaiger, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Viking Waldén, Anna Dreber\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41562-024-02062-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Here we test the feasibility of using decision markets to select studies for replication and provide evidence about the replicability of online experiments. Social scientists (<i>n</i> = 162) traded on the outcome of close replications of 41 systematically selected MTurk social science experiments published in PNAS 2015–2018, knowing that the 12 studies with the lowest and the 12 with the highest final market prices would be selected for replication, along with 2 randomly selected studies. The replication rate, based on the statistical significance indicator, was 83% for the top-12 and 33% for the bottom-12 group. Overall, 54% of the studies were successfully replicated, with replication effect size estimates averaging 45% of the original effect size estimates. The replication rate varied between 54% and 62% for alternative replication indicators. The observed replicability of MTurk experiments is comparable to that of previous systematic replication projects involving laboratory experiments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Human Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Human Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02062-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Human Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02062-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining the replicability of online experiments selected by a decision market
Here we test the feasibility of using decision markets to select studies for replication and provide evidence about the replicability of online experiments. Social scientists (n = 162) traded on the outcome of close replications of 41 systematically selected MTurk social science experiments published in PNAS 2015–2018, knowing that the 12 studies with the lowest and the 12 with the highest final market prices would be selected for replication, along with 2 randomly selected studies. The replication rate, based on the statistical significance indicator, was 83% for the top-12 and 33% for the bottom-12 group. Overall, 54% of the studies were successfully replicated, with replication effect size estimates averaging 45% of the original effect size estimates. The replication rate varied between 54% and 62% for alternative replication indicators. The observed replicability of MTurk experiments is comparable to that of previous systematic replication projects involving laboratory experiments.
期刊介绍:
Nature Human Behaviour is a journal that focuses on publishing research of outstanding significance into any aspect of human behavior.The research can cover various areas such as psychological, biological, and social bases of human behavior.It also includes the study of origins, development, and disorders related to human behavior.The primary aim of the journal is to increase the visibility of research in the field and enhance its societal reach and impact.