止血带的使用会影响全膝关节置换术后的五年疗效吗?

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jonathan L Katzman, Carlos G Sandoval, Mackenzie A Roof, Joshua C Rozell, Morteza Meftah, Ran Schwarzkopf
{"title":"止血带的使用会影响全膝关节置换术后的五年疗效吗?","authors":"Jonathan L Katzman, Carlos G Sandoval, Mackenzie A Roof, Joshua C Rozell, Morteza Meftah, Ran Schwarzkopf","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A tourniquet is commonly used during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve surgical field visibility and minimize blood loss. While the short-term effects of tourniquet use on postoperative outcomes have been studied extensively and found to be minimal, its influence on longer-term outcomes remains underexplored. This study examined tourniquet use in TKA with up to five-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial, 227 patients who underwent primary TKA in the tourniquet (T) group (n = 112) or no tourniquet (NT) group (n = 115) were evaluated. Clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The T group had non-significant trends toward reduced blood loss (131.8 versus 116.7 ml, P = 0.098) and shorter operative time (97.8 versus 95.7 minutes, P = 0.264), with slightly higher postoperative day-one Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores (3.1 versus 3.6, P = 0.197). Length of stay (2.0 versus 2.1 days, P = 0.837) and home discharge rate (88.7 versus 92.0%, P = 0.340) were comparable. The NT group had three 90-day readmissions, while none occurred in the T group (2.7 versus 0%, P = 0.081). The active range of motion at the final follow-up was similar between groups (108.3 versus 106.5 degrees, P = 0.457). All-cause revision rates at five years were comparable between the NT and T groups (5.2 versus 3.6%, P = 0.546). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis revealed comparable aseptic implant survival at five years (P = 0.769). There were no significant differences in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, PROMIS pain interference, or PROMIS physical health scores at three months, one year, and five years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a tourniquet during primary TKA was not associated with differences in clinical or patient-reported outcomes at up to five-year follow-up. These findings suggest that tourniquet use in TKA can be left to the surgeon's discretion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Use of a Tourniquet Influence Five-Year Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan L Katzman, Carlos G Sandoval, Mackenzie A Roof, Joshua C Rozell, Morteza Meftah, Ran Schwarzkopf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A tourniquet is commonly used during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve surgical field visibility and minimize blood loss. While the short-term effects of tourniquet use on postoperative outcomes have been studied extensively and found to be minimal, its influence on longer-term outcomes remains underexplored. This study examined tourniquet use in TKA with up to five-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial, 227 patients who underwent primary TKA in the tourniquet (T) group (n = 112) or no tourniquet (NT) group (n = 115) were evaluated. Clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The T group had non-significant trends toward reduced blood loss (131.8 versus 116.7 ml, P = 0.098) and shorter operative time (97.8 versus 95.7 minutes, P = 0.264), with slightly higher postoperative day-one Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores (3.1 versus 3.6, P = 0.197). Length of stay (2.0 versus 2.1 days, P = 0.837) and home discharge rate (88.7 versus 92.0%, P = 0.340) were comparable. The NT group had three 90-day readmissions, while none occurred in the T group (2.7 versus 0%, P = 0.081). The active range of motion at the final follow-up was similar between groups (108.3 versus 106.5 degrees, P = 0.457). All-cause revision rates at five years were comparable between the NT and T groups (5.2 versus 3.6%, P = 0.546). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis revealed comparable aseptic implant survival at five years (P = 0.769). There were no significant differences in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, PROMIS pain interference, or PROMIS physical health scores at three months, one year, and five years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a tourniquet during primary TKA was not associated with differences in clinical or patient-reported outcomes at up to five-year follow-up. These findings suggest that tourniquet use in TKA can be left to the surgeon's discretion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:止血带通常用于全膝关节置换术(TKA),以改善手术视野并减少失血。虽然止血带的使用对术后结果的短期影响已被广泛研究并发现微乎其微,但其对长期结果的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究对 TKA 中止血带的使用情况进行了长达五年的随访:在这项随机对照试验的事后分析中,对止血带(T)组(112 人)或无止血带(NT)组(115 人)的 227 名接受初次 TKA 的患者进行了评估。对两组患者的临床结果和患者报告结果指标(PROMs)进行了比较:结果:止血带组的失血量减少(131.8 毫升对 116.7 毫升,P = 0.098),手术时间缩短(97.8 分钟对 95.7 分钟,P = 0.264),但术后第一天的视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分略高(3.1 分对 3.6 分,P = 0.197)。住院时间(2.0 天对 2.1 天,P = 0.837)和出院回家率(88.7% 对 92.0%,P = 0.340)相当。NT组有3例90天再入院,而T组则没有(2.7%对0%,P = 0.081)。两组患者在最后随访时的主动活动范围相似(108.3 对 106.5 度,P = 0.457)。NT组和T组的五年全因翻修率相当(5.2%对3.6%,P = 0.546)。卡普兰-梅耶尔存活率分析显示,无菌植入物的五年存活率相当(P = 0.769)。术后三个月、一年和五年的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎关节置换术结果评分(KOOS,JR)、患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛强度、PROMIS疼痛干扰或PROMIS身体健康评分均无明显差异:结论:在初次 TKA 手术中使用止血带与长达五年的随访中临床或患者报告结果的差异无关。这些研究结果表明,在 TKA 中使用止血带可由外科医生自行决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Use of a Tourniquet Influence Five-Year Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Background: A tourniquet is commonly used during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve surgical field visibility and minimize blood loss. While the short-term effects of tourniquet use on postoperative outcomes have been studied extensively and found to be minimal, its influence on longer-term outcomes remains underexplored. This study examined tourniquet use in TKA with up to five-year follow-up.

Methods: In this post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial, 227 patients who underwent primary TKA in the tourniquet (T) group (n = 112) or no tourniquet (NT) group (n = 115) were evaluated. Clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between the two groups.

Results: The T group had non-significant trends toward reduced blood loss (131.8 versus 116.7 ml, P = 0.098) and shorter operative time (97.8 versus 95.7 minutes, P = 0.264), with slightly higher postoperative day-one Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores (3.1 versus 3.6, P = 0.197). Length of stay (2.0 versus 2.1 days, P = 0.837) and home discharge rate (88.7 versus 92.0%, P = 0.340) were comparable. The NT group had three 90-day readmissions, while none occurred in the T group (2.7 versus 0%, P = 0.081). The active range of motion at the final follow-up was similar between groups (108.3 versus 106.5 degrees, P = 0.457). All-cause revision rates at five years were comparable between the NT and T groups (5.2 versus 3.6%, P = 0.546). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis revealed comparable aseptic implant survival at five years (P = 0.769). There were no significant differences in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, PROMIS pain interference, or PROMIS physical health scores at three months, one year, and five years postoperatively.

Conclusion: Using a tourniquet during primary TKA was not associated with differences in clinical or patient-reported outcomes at up to five-year follow-up. These findings suggest that tourniquet use in TKA can be left to the surgeon's discretion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信