澳大利亚医院文化安全倡议的实施与评估:范围审查。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Belinda Clough, Jennifer Fraser, Tara Flemington, Tamara Power
{"title":"澳大利亚医院文化安全倡议的实施与评估:范围审查。","authors":"Belinda Clough, Jennifer Fraser, Tara Flemington, Tamara Power","doi":"10.1177/10436596241296818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize and summarize existing evidence for implementing and evaluating Cultural Safety initiatives in Australian hospitals for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The rationale for this work was to establish guidelines for best practice in providing culturally safe care across hospital and health services.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A systematic search guided by PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews was conducted across five databases: CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, and Informit. Reference lists and citations of eligible studies were also examined. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were in English and discussed the implementation and/or evaluation of Cultural Safety initiatives in Australian hospitals. Evaluations assessing both health care staff and patient perspectives were included. Studies were excluded if they presented future implementation protocols or initiatives among health care students. No date limiters were applied due to the small body of available literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met the criteria and were included in this review. Five themes emerged: (a) process of implementation; (b) process of evaluation; (c) change in health professional's behavior; (d) change in patient behavior; and (e) future recommendations.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Validated implementation frameworks and evaluation tools are needed for integrating Cultural Safety initiatives into Australian hospital settings. This review has highlighted that despite the availability of evidence-based tools, their use was lacking. This scoping review also highlighted that evaluation of Cultural Safety initiatives is primarily focused on the attitudes and knowledge of health professionals, rather than patient experience. As Cultural Safety is determined by recipients of care, future evaluation of initiatives should prioritize patient perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":49969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transcultural Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"10436596241296818"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and Evaluation of Cultural Safety Initiatives in Australian Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Belinda Clough, Jennifer Fraser, Tara Flemington, Tamara Power\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10436596241296818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize and summarize existing evidence for implementing and evaluating Cultural Safety initiatives in Australian hospitals for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The rationale for this work was to establish guidelines for best practice in providing culturally safe care across hospital and health services.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A systematic search guided by PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews was conducted across five databases: CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, and Informit. Reference lists and citations of eligible studies were also examined. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were in English and discussed the implementation and/or evaluation of Cultural Safety initiatives in Australian hospitals. Evaluations assessing both health care staff and patient perspectives were included. Studies were excluded if they presented future implementation protocols or initiatives among health care students. No date limiters were applied due to the small body of available literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met the criteria and were included in this review. Five themes emerged: (a) process of implementation; (b) process of evaluation; (c) change in health professional's behavior; (d) change in patient behavior; and (e) future recommendations.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Validated implementation frameworks and evaluation tools are needed for integrating Cultural Safety initiatives into Australian hospital settings. This review has highlighted that despite the availability of evidence-based tools, their use was lacking. This scoping review also highlighted that evaluation of Cultural Safety initiatives is primarily focused on the attitudes and knowledge of health professionals, rather than patient experience. As Cultural Safety is determined by recipients of care, future evaluation of initiatives should prioritize patient perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transcultural Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10436596241296818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transcultural Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10436596241296818\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transcultural Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10436596241296818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本范围综述旨在综合和总结澳大利亚医院为土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民实施和评估文化安全措施的现有证据。这项工作的目的是为医院和医疗服务机构提供文化安全护理的最佳实践制定指导方针:在 PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews 的指导下,对五个数据库进行了系统检索:CINAHL、Scopus、MEDLINE、Embase 和 Informit。此外,还对符合条件的研究的参考文献列表和引文进行了审查。符合纳入条件的研究均为英文研究,并讨论了澳大利亚医院文化安全措施的实施和/或评估。其中包括对医护人员和患者观点的评估。如果研究介绍的是未来在医护学生中实施的方案或倡议,则不在研究范围内。由于现有文献数量较少,因此未对日期进行限制:结果:9 项研究符合标准并被纳入本综述。出现了五个主题:(a) 实施过程;(b) 评估过程;(c) 医护人员行为的改变;(d) 患者行为的改变;以及 (e) 未来建议:将文化安全倡议纳入澳大利亚医院环境需要经过验证的实施框架和评估工具。本次审查强调,尽管存在循证工具,但缺乏对其的使用。本次范围界定审查还强调,对文化安全倡议的评估主要集中在医疗专业人员的态度和知识上,而不是病人的体验上。由于文化安全是由护理对象决定的,因此未来的评估应优先考虑患者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation and Evaluation of Cultural Safety Initiatives in Australian Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize and summarize existing evidence for implementing and evaluating Cultural Safety initiatives in Australian hospitals for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The rationale for this work was to establish guidelines for best practice in providing culturally safe care across hospital and health services.

Methodology: A systematic search guided by PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews was conducted across five databases: CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, and Informit. Reference lists and citations of eligible studies were also examined. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were in English and discussed the implementation and/or evaluation of Cultural Safety initiatives in Australian hospitals. Evaluations assessing both health care staff and patient perspectives were included. Studies were excluded if they presented future implementation protocols or initiatives among health care students. No date limiters were applied due to the small body of available literature.

Results: Nine studies met the criteria and were included in this review. Five themes emerged: (a) process of implementation; (b) process of evaluation; (c) change in health professional's behavior; (d) change in patient behavior; and (e) future recommendations.

Discussion and conclusions: Validated implementation frameworks and evaluation tools are needed for integrating Cultural Safety initiatives into Australian hospital settings. This review has highlighted that despite the availability of evidence-based tools, their use was lacking. This scoping review also highlighted that evaluation of Cultural Safety initiatives is primarily focused on the attitudes and knowledge of health professionals, rather than patient experience. As Cultural Safety is determined by recipients of care, future evaluation of initiatives should prioritize patient perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
80
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Transcultural Nursing (TCN) is a peer-reviewed journal that offers nurses, educators, researchers, and practitioners theoretical approaches and current research findings that have direct implications for the delivery of culturally congruent health care and for the preparation of health care professionals who will provide that care. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信