种植体支撑的单冠上中牙悬臂对生物学和技术并发症的影响:回顾性研究。

Yufei Yang, Jiayu Gao, Yi Man, Xingmei Yang, Yingying Wu, Lin Xiang, Yili Qu
{"title":"种植体支撑的单冠上中牙悬臂对生物学和技术并发症的影响:回顾性研究。","authors":"Yufei Yang, Jiayu Gao, Yi Man, Xingmei Yang, Yingying Wu, Lin Xiang, Yili Qu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To retrospectively evaluate the influence of mesiodistal intra-coronal cantilever width of implant-supported single crowns on the implant and restoration complication-free survival rate and the peri-implant soft and hard tissues.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 142 patients with 179 implants in the posterior region were evaluated. The implants were divided into three groups according to intra-coronal cantilever width (Group 1, ≤ 1 mm; Group 2, 1 mm intra-coronal cantilever width 2 mm; Group 3, ≥ 2 mm). Marginal bone loss, complications and clinical parameters were used to evaluate the influence of intra-coronal cantilever width on implant-supported single crowns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 included 95 implants, Group 2 was composed of 27 implants and Group 3 comprised 57 implants. A univariate Cox proportional hazards model, assessing implant complication-free survival, indicated a higher complication rate for Group 3 compared to Group 1 (P = 0.009). Furthermore, the marginal bone loss on the cantilever side over the short-term and medium- to long-term follow-up period indicated that intra-coronal cantilever width ≥ 2 mm may be considered a risk factor. From a clinical perspective, compared with Group 3, Groups 1 and 2 exhibited lower incidence rates of bleeding on probing during the medium- to long-term follow-up period (P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite its limitations, the present study shows that posterior single implant crowns with mesiodistal intra-coronal cantilevers equal to or higher than 2 mm will present greater marginal bone loss, complications and tissue inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"17 4","pages":"383-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the mesiodistal cantilever on implant-supported single crowns on biological and technical complications: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Yufei Yang, Jiayu Gao, Yi Man, Xingmei Yang, Yingying Wu, Lin Xiang, Yili Qu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To retrospectively evaluate the influence of mesiodistal intra-coronal cantilever width of implant-supported single crowns on the implant and restoration complication-free survival rate and the peri-implant soft and hard tissues.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 142 patients with 179 implants in the posterior region were evaluated. The implants were divided into three groups according to intra-coronal cantilever width (Group 1, ≤ 1 mm; Group 2, 1 mm intra-coronal cantilever width 2 mm; Group 3, ≥ 2 mm). Marginal bone loss, complications and clinical parameters were used to evaluate the influence of intra-coronal cantilever width on implant-supported single crowns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 included 95 implants, Group 2 was composed of 27 implants and Group 3 comprised 57 implants. A univariate Cox proportional hazards model, assessing implant complication-free survival, indicated a higher complication rate for Group 3 compared to Group 1 (P = 0.009). Furthermore, the marginal bone loss on the cantilever side over the short-term and medium- to long-term follow-up period indicated that intra-coronal cantilever width ≥ 2 mm may be considered a risk factor. From a clinical perspective, compared with Group 3, Groups 1 and 2 exhibited lower incidence rates of bleeding on probing during the medium- to long-term follow-up period (P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite its limitations, the present study shows that posterior single implant crowns with mesiodistal intra-coronal cantilevers equal to or higher than 2 mm will present greater marginal bone loss, complications and tissue inflammation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"383-400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:回顾性评估种植体支持单冠的中轴内悬臂宽度对种植体和修复体的无并发症存活率以及种植体周围软组织和硬组织的影响:共对142名患者的179颗种植体进行了评估。根据冠内悬臂宽度将种植体分为三组(第1组,冠内悬臂宽度≤1毫米;第2组,冠内悬臂宽度1毫米至2毫米;第3组,冠内悬臂宽度≥2毫米)。通过边缘骨量损失、并发症和临床参数来评估冠内悬臂宽度对种植体支撑单冠的影响:第一组包括 95 个种植体,第二组包括 27 个种植体,第三组包括 57 个种植体。评估种植体无并发症存活率的单变量考克斯比例危险模型显示,与第一组相比,第三组的并发症发生率更高(P = 0.009)。此外,在短期和中长期随访期间,悬臂一侧的边缘骨质流失表明,冠内悬臂宽度≥ 2 毫米可被视为一个风险因素。从临床角度来看,与第 3 组相比,第 1 组和第 2 组在中长期随访期间探针出血的发生率较低(P = 0.003):尽管存在局限性,但本研究表明,后部单种植体牙冠的中轴内悬臂等于或大于 2 毫米时,边缘骨丧失、并发症和组织炎症的发生率会更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of the mesiodistal cantilever on implant-supported single crowns on biological and technical complications: A retrospective study.

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the influence of mesiodistal intra-coronal cantilever width of implant-supported single crowns on the implant and restoration complication-free survival rate and the peri-implant soft and hard tissues.

Materials and methods: A total of 142 patients with 179 implants in the posterior region were evaluated. The implants were divided into three groups according to intra-coronal cantilever width (Group 1, ≤ 1 mm; Group 2, 1 mm intra-coronal cantilever width 2 mm; Group 3, ≥ 2 mm). Marginal bone loss, complications and clinical parameters were used to evaluate the influence of intra-coronal cantilever width on implant-supported single crowns.

Results: Group 1 included 95 implants, Group 2 was composed of 27 implants and Group 3 comprised 57 implants. A univariate Cox proportional hazards model, assessing implant complication-free survival, indicated a higher complication rate for Group 3 compared to Group 1 (P = 0.009). Furthermore, the marginal bone loss on the cantilever side over the short-term and medium- to long-term follow-up period indicated that intra-coronal cantilever width ≥ 2 mm may be considered a risk factor. From a clinical perspective, compared with Group 3, Groups 1 and 2 exhibited lower incidence rates of bleeding on probing during the medium- to long-term follow-up period (P = 0.003).

Conclusions: Despite its limitations, the present study shows that posterior single implant crowns with mesiodistal intra-coronal cantilevers equal to or higher than 2 mm will present greater marginal bone loss, complications and tissue inflammation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信