牙槽骨发育不良患者无牙颌部位的种植体治疗与活动义齿治疗:至少随访 3 年的系统性文献综述。

Shanlin Li, Rafael Delgado-Ruiz, Georgios Romanos
{"title":"牙槽骨发育不良患者无牙颌部位的种植体治疗与活动义齿治疗:至少随访 3 年的系统性文献综述。","authors":"Shanlin Li, Rafael Delgado-Ruiz, Georgios Romanos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the medium- and long-term efficacy of implants and removable prostheses used to manage edentulous patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were searched from December 2022 to March 2023. Two independent reviewers completed the search using a population, intervention, comparison, outcome and time questionnaire. Articles were selected based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses workflow was employed to represent the number of included and excluded articles. The risk of bias was analysed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. From the included articles, the following information was extracted: demographics, concurrent medical conditions, characteristics of florid cemento-osseous dysplasia (clinical, radiographic and histological), interventions performed on the edentulous sites (placement of implants or removable prostheses), outcomes after the interventions (complications, success, bone loss, implant loss and relapse) and follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six articles were included in the final analysis, and implants and removable prostheses were the devices reported to have been used to restore the edentulous sites. Eleven implants were placed in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia, with a survival rate of 91%. Three out of three removable prostheses were delivered and all resulted in symptoms and required surgical interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Removable prostheses in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia can present complications. Implant placement within the florid cemento-osseous dysplasia lesion is unpredictable and can result in radiolucency and implant loss; meanwhile, implant placement outside of the lesion has shown favourable medium-term results. Data are limited on the long-term efficacy of implants and removable prostheses in managing edentulous sites in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"17 4","pages":"345-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dental implants versus removable prostheses for the management of edentulous sites in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia: A systematic review of literature with a follow-up period of at least 3 years.\",\"authors\":\"Shanlin Li, Rafael Delgado-Ruiz, Georgios Romanos\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the medium- and long-term efficacy of implants and removable prostheses used to manage edentulous patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were searched from December 2022 to March 2023. Two independent reviewers completed the search using a population, intervention, comparison, outcome and time questionnaire. Articles were selected based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses workflow was employed to represent the number of included and excluded articles. The risk of bias was analysed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. From the included articles, the following information was extracted: demographics, concurrent medical conditions, characteristics of florid cemento-osseous dysplasia (clinical, radiographic and histological), interventions performed on the edentulous sites (placement of implants or removable prostheses), outcomes after the interventions (complications, success, bone loss, implant loss and relapse) and follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six articles were included in the final analysis, and implants and removable prostheses were the devices reported to have been used to restore the edentulous sites. Eleven implants were placed in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia, with a survival rate of 91%. Three out of three removable prostheses were delivered and all resulted in symptoms and required surgical interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Removable prostheses in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia can present complications. Implant placement within the florid cemento-osseous dysplasia lesion is unpredictable and can result in radiolucency and implant loss; meanwhile, implant placement outside of the lesion has shown favourable medium-term results. Data are limited on the long-term efficacy of implants and removable prostheses in managing edentulous sites in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"345-356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较种植体和可摘义齿在治疗牙槽骨发育不良的无牙颌患者中的中长期疗效:从 2022 年 12 月到 2023 年 3 月,对 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 数据库进行了检索。两位独立审稿人使用人群、干预、对比、结果和时间问卷完成了检索。文章根据严格的纳入和排除标准进行筛选。采用 "系统综述和元分析首选报告项目 "工作流程来表示纳入和排除文章的数量。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的批判性评估清单(Critical Appraisal Checklist)分析偏倚风险。从纳入的文章中提取了以下信息:人口统计学、并发症、多发性骨水泥牙槽骨发育不良的特征(临床、放射学和组织学)、对无牙部位进行的干预(植入种植体或可摘义齿)、干预后的结果(并发症、成功率、骨量丢失、种植体丢失和复发)以及随访时间:最终分析共收录了六篇文章,据报道,种植体和可摘义齿是用于修复无牙颌部位的设备。在牙槽骨发育不良的患者中植入了11颗种植体,存活率为91%。在三个可摘义齿中,有三个已经植入,但都出现了症状,需要手术治疗:花骨水泥牙槽骨发育不良患者的可摘义齿可能会出现并发症。结论:骨水泥牙槽骨发育不良患者的可摘义齿可能会出现并发症。在骨水泥牙槽骨发育不良的病变区内植入义齿是不可预测的,可能会导致放射性渗出和义齿脱落;而在病变区外植入义齿则可获得良好的中期效果。关于种植体和可摘义齿在治疗骨水泥牙槽骨发育不良患者无牙颌部位的长期疗效的数据还很有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dental implants versus removable prostheses for the management of edentulous sites in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia: A systematic review of literature with a follow-up period of at least 3 years.

Purpose: To compare the medium- and long-term efficacy of implants and removable prostheses used to manage edentulous patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia.

Materials and methods: The PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were searched from December 2022 to March 2023. Two independent reviewers completed the search using a population, intervention, comparison, outcome and time questionnaire. Articles were selected based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses workflow was employed to represent the number of included and excluded articles. The risk of bias was analysed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. From the included articles, the following information was extracted: demographics, concurrent medical conditions, characteristics of florid cemento-osseous dysplasia (clinical, radiographic and histological), interventions performed on the edentulous sites (placement of implants or removable prostheses), outcomes after the interventions (complications, success, bone loss, implant loss and relapse) and follow-up period.

Results: Six articles were included in the final analysis, and implants and removable prostheses were the devices reported to have been used to restore the edentulous sites. Eleven implants were placed in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia, with a survival rate of 91%. Three out of three removable prostheses were delivered and all resulted in symptoms and required surgical interventions.

Conclusions: Removable prostheses in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia can present complications. Implant placement within the florid cemento-osseous dysplasia lesion is unpredictable and can result in radiolucency and implant loss; meanwhile, implant placement outside of the lesion has shown favourable medium-term results. Data are limited on the long-term efficacy of implants and removable prostheses in managing edentulous sites in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信