前列腺癌的快速诊断途径:现实主义综述。

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Katie Jones , Arya Chandran , Jaynie Rance
{"title":"前列腺癌的快速诊断途径:现实主义综述。","authors":"Katie Jones ,&nbsp;Arya Chandran ,&nbsp;Jaynie Rance","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The NHS Long-term Plan outlines a number of approaches to address delays and diagnose three out of four cancers at an early stage, and yet patients regularly experience delays to diagnosis. Attempts to address such delays include the implementation of a number of rapid diagnosis pathways (RDPs). This realist review explores rapid diagnosis pathways for prostate cancer, identifying approaches to RDPs, as well as generating theories regarding what works, for whom and under which circumstances.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a realist evidence synthesis. The questions and approach are informed by patient and public involvement (PPI). We conducted a scoping review to generate initial programme theories and then refined these through further search processes. As a realist review, we do not focus on a specific data type or outcome, rather we include qualitative and quantitative data to inform theories comprised of contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes (CMO chains).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six studies were included in our scoping review; twenty studies were included in the second review. The studies include qualitative and quantitative data. We identified three broad themes: Primary care, organizational factors, and patient experience.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions/ Recommendations</h3><div>We recommend the involvement of adjoining services (e.g. general practice and radiology) in the planning of prostate cancer RDPs and emphasize the importance of clear communication with patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid diagnostic pathways for prostate cancer: A realist synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Katie Jones ,&nbsp;Arya Chandran ,&nbsp;Jaynie Rance\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The NHS Long-term Plan outlines a number of approaches to address delays and diagnose three out of four cancers at an early stage, and yet patients regularly experience delays to diagnosis. Attempts to address such delays include the implementation of a number of rapid diagnosis pathways (RDPs). This realist review explores rapid diagnosis pathways for prostate cancer, identifying approaches to RDPs, as well as generating theories regarding what works, for whom and under which circumstances.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a realist evidence synthesis. The questions and approach are informed by patient and public involvement (PPI). We conducted a scoping review to generate initial programme theories and then refined these through further search processes. As a realist review, we do not focus on a specific data type or outcome, rather we include qualitative and quantitative data to inform theories comprised of contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes (CMO chains).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six studies were included in our scoping review; twenty studies were included in the second review. The studies include qualitative and quantitative data. We identified three broad themes: Primary care, organizational factors, and patient experience.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions/ Recommendations</h3><div>We recommend the involvement of adjoining services (e.g. general practice and radiology) in the planning of prostate cancer RDPs and emphasize the importance of clear communication with patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:国家医疗服务体系长期计划》概述了一系列解决延误和早期诊断四分之三癌症的方法,但患者经常会遇到诊断延误的情况,这可能会导致接受诊断者的治疗效果较差。解决此类延误的尝试包括实施一系列快速诊断路径(RDPs)。这篇现实主义综述探讨了前列腺癌的快速诊断路径,确定了快速诊断路径的方法,并就什么方法有效、对谁有效以及在什么情况下有效等问题提出了理论:这是一项现实主义证据综述。方法:这是一项现实主义证据综述,其问题和方法均以患者和公众参与(PPI)为基础。我们进行了一次范围界定审查,以产生初步的方案理论,然后通过进一步的搜索过程完善这些理论。作为一项现实主义综述,我们并不专注于特定的数据类型或结果,而是将定性和定量数据纳入其中,为由背景、机制和结果(CMO 链)组成的理论提供依据:我们的范围界定审查包括六项研究;第二次审查包括二十项研究。这些研究包括定性和定量数据。我们确定了三大主题:结论/建议:我们建议相关服务部门(如全科医生和放射科)参与前列腺癌前列腺放射治疗计划的制定,并强调与患者明确沟通的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rapid diagnostic pathways for prostate cancer: A realist synthesis

Introduction

The NHS Long-term Plan outlines a number of approaches to address delays and diagnose three out of four cancers at an early stage, and yet patients regularly experience delays to diagnosis. Attempts to address such delays include the implementation of a number of rapid diagnosis pathways (RDPs). This realist review explores rapid diagnosis pathways for prostate cancer, identifying approaches to RDPs, as well as generating theories regarding what works, for whom and under which circumstances.

Methods

This is a realist evidence synthesis. The questions and approach are informed by patient and public involvement (PPI). We conducted a scoping review to generate initial programme theories and then refined these through further search processes. As a realist review, we do not focus on a specific data type or outcome, rather we include qualitative and quantitative data to inform theories comprised of contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes (CMO chains).

Results

Six studies were included in our scoping review; twenty studies were included in the second review. The studies include qualitative and quantitative data. We identified three broad themes: Primary care, organizational factors, and patient experience.

Conclusions/ Recommendations

We recommend the involvement of adjoining services (e.g. general practice and radiology) in the planning of prostate cancer RDPs and emphasize the importance of clear communication with patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信