诊断肝周胆管癌时可接受的胆道镜引导活检次数。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Juan Octavio Alonso Lárraga, José Miguel Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Marcos Meneses-Mayo, Angélica Hernández-Guerrero, Mónica Lizzette Serrano-Arévalo, Lidia Faridi Villegas-González
{"title":"诊断肝周胆管癌时可接受的胆道镜引导活检次数。","authors":"Juan Octavio Alonso Lárraga, José Miguel Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Marcos Meneses-Mayo, Angélica Hernández-Guerrero, Mónica Lizzette Serrano-Arévalo, Lidia Faridi Villegas-González","doi":"10.17235/reed.2024.10719/2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma can be challenging. Previous studies suggest that the sensitivity of taking three cholangioscopy-guided biopsies is approximately 70%. We hypothesized that obtaining four or more biopsies might improve the sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies to improve sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed clinical records of adults with perihilar stenosis who underwent cholangioscopy-guided biopsies. Patients with gallbladder cancer or metastatic bile duct obstruction were excluded. Data were grouped based on the number of biopsies taken: Group A (1 to 3 biopsies), Group B (4 to 6 biopsies), and Group C (7 to 10 biopsies). Results from each group were compared against a composite standard, including clinical follow-up and/or biopsies performed by alternative methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group that underwent 4 to 6 biopsies had a sensitivity of 77.4%, while the group with 7 to 10 had a sensitivity of 70.8%. The group with 1 to 3 biopsies had a sensitivity of 34.5%. Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups, with comparisons showing improved sensitivity in the 4 to 6 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 14.42, P = 0.0001), and the 7 to 10 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 6.56, P = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performing 4 to 6 cholangioscopy-guided biopsies significantly improves sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma compared to 1 to 3 biopsies. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21342,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Octavio Alonso Lárraga, José Miguel Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Marcos Meneses-Mayo, Angélica Hernández-Guerrero, Mónica Lizzette Serrano-Arévalo, Lidia Faridi Villegas-González\",\"doi\":\"10.17235/reed.2024.10719/2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma can be challenging. Previous studies suggest that the sensitivity of taking three cholangioscopy-guided biopsies is approximately 70%. We hypothesized that obtaining four or more biopsies might improve the sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies to improve sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed clinical records of adults with perihilar stenosis who underwent cholangioscopy-guided biopsies. Patients with gallbladder cancer or metastatic bile duct obstruction were excluded. Data were grouped based on the number of biopsies taken: Group A (1 to 3 biopsies), Group B (4 to 6 biopsies), and Group C (7 to 10 biopsies). Results from each group were compared against a composite standard, including clinical follow-up and/or biopsies performed by alternative methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group that underwent 4 to 6 biopsies had a sensitivity of 77.4%, while the group with 7 to 10 had a sensitivity of 70.8%. The group with 1 to 3 biopsies had a sensitivity of 34.5%. Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups, with comparisons showing improved sensitivity in the 4 to 6 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 14.42, P = 0.0001), and the 7 to 10 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 6.56, P = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performing 4 to 6 cholangioscopy-guided biopsies significantly improves sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma compared to 1 to 3 biopsies. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2024.10719/2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2024.10719/2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介诊断肝周胆管癌具有挑战性。以往的研究表明,在胆道镜引导下进行三次活检的灵敏度约为 70%。我们假设,进行四次或更多次活检可能会提高诊断肝周胆管癌的敏感性:确定可接受的胆道镜引导活检次数,以提高诊断肝周胆管癌的灵敏度:这项回顾性研究分析了接受胆道镜引导活检的肝周狭窄成人患者的临床记录。排除了胆囊癌或转移性胆管梗阻患者。根据活检次数对数据进行分组:A组(1至3次活检)、B组(4至6次活检)和C组(7至10次活检)。将各组的结果与综合标准(包括临床随访和/或通过其他方法进行的活检)进行比较:结果:进行 4 到 6 次活检的组的灵敏度为 77.4%,而进行 7 到 10 次活检的组的灵敏度为 70.8%。活组织检查次数为 1 至 3 次的一组的灵敏度为 34.5%。各组之间存在明显的统计学差异,比较显示,4-6次活检组与1-3次活检组相比灵敏度更高(χ² = 14.42,P = 0.0001),7-10次活检组与1-3次活检组相比灵敏度更高(χ² = 6.56,P = 0.010):结论:与1-3次活检相比,在胆道镜引导下进行4-6次活检可显著提高诊断肝周胆管癌的敏感性。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Introduction: Diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma can be challenging. Previous studies suggest that the sensitivity of taking three cholangioscopy-guided biopsies is approximately 70%. We hypothesized that obtaining four or more biopsies might improve the sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Objective: To determine the acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies to improve sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical records of adults with perihilar stenosis who underwent cholangioscopy-guided biopsies. Patients with gallbladder cancer or metastatic bile duct obstruction were excluded. Data were grouped based on the number of biopsies taken: Group A (1 to 3 biopsies), Group B (4 to 6 biopsies), and Group C (7 to 10 biopsies). Results from each group were compared against a composite standard, including clinical follow-up and/or biopsies performed by alternative methods.

Results: The group that underwent 4 to 6 biopsies had a sensitivity of 77.4%, while the group with 7 to 10 had a sensitivity of 70.8%. The group with 1 to 3 biopsies had a sensitivity of 34.5%. Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups, with comparisons showing improved sensitivity in the 4 to 6 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 14.42, P = 0.0001), and the 7 to 10 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 6.56, P = 0.010).

Conclusions: Performing 4 to 6 cholangioscopy-guided biopsies significantly improves sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma compared to 1 to 3 biopsies. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
400
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (SEED) y Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva (AEED), publica artículos originales, editoriales, revisiones, casos clínicos, cartas al director, imágenes en patología digestiva, y otros artículos especiales sobre todos los aspectos relativos a las enfermedades digestivas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信