Ataollah Shahbandi, Shahab Aldin Sattari, Tej D Azad, Yuanxuan Xia, Kurt Lehner, Wuyang Yang, James Feghali, Rebecca A Reynolds, S Hassan A Akbari, Mari L Groves, Risheng Xu, Justin M Caplan, Chetan Bettegowda, Alan R Cohen, Judy Huang, Rafael J Tamargo, L Fernando Gonzalez
{"title":"小儿无症状莫亚莫亚病的治疗：系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Ataollah Shahbandi, Shahab Aldin Sattari, Tej D Azad, Yuanxuan Xia, Kurt Lehner, Wuyang Yang, James Feghali, Rebecca A Reynolds, S Hassan A Akbari, Mari L Groves, Risheng Xu, Justin M Caplan, Chetan Bettegowda, Alan R Cohen, Judy Huang, Rafael J Tamargo, L Fernando Gonzalez","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The optimal management strategy for pediatric patients with symptomatic moyamoya disease (MMD) is not well established. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares surgical vs conservative management and direct/combined bypass (DB/CB) vs indirect bypass (IB) for pediatric patients with symptomatic MMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from inception to March 17, 2024. For analysis of surgical vs conservative treatment, the primary and secondary outcomes were follow-up ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhagic events, respectively. For analysis of DB/CB vs IB, the primary outcome was follow-up ischemic stroke, and secondary outcomes included follow-up transient ischemic attack, new or worsened seizures, symptomatic improvement, modified Rankin Scale score ≤2, and Matsushima grade A at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two included studies yielded 1091 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 35.7 months. Regarding surgical vs conservative management, 428 patients were analyzed. Surgical treatment was associated with lower odds of ischemic stroke (odds ratios [OR] = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11-0.97], P = .04), and intracranial hemorrhagic events tended to be lower with surgery (OR = 0.25 [0.06-1.03], P = .05). Regarding DB/CB techniques vs IB, 875 patients were analyzed. The groups had similar rates of ischemic stroke (OR = 0.79 [0.31-1.97], P = .61), transient ischemic attack (OR = 1.27[0.46-3.55], P = .64), new or worsened seizures (OR = 1.05[0.3-3.65], P = .93), symptomatic improvement (OR = 2.45[0.71-8.45], P = .16), and follow-up modified Rankin Scale ≤2 (OR = 1.21 [0.16-8.85], P = .85). CB was associated with higher Matsushima grade A relative to IB (OR = 3.44 [1.32-9.97], P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical revascularization yielded more favorable clinical outcomes than conservative management in this meta-analysis. Clinical outcomes were similar between DB/CB vs IB techniques. Surgical flow augmentation, either by DB/CB or IB, seems to benefit pediatric patients with symptomatic MMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Management of Symptomatic Moyamoya Disease in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ataollah Shahbandi, Shahab Aldin Sattari, Tej D Azad, Yuanxuan Xia, Kurt Lehner, Wuyang Yang, James Feghali, Rebecca A Reynolds, S Hassan A Akbari, Mari L Groves, Risheng Xu, Justin M Caplan, Chetan Bettegowda, Alan R Cohen, Judy Huang, Rafael J Tamargo, L Fernando Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000003277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The optimal management strategy for pediatric patients with symptomatic moyamoya disease (MMD) is not well established. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares surgical vs conservative management and direct/combined bypass (DB/CB) vs indirect bypass (IB) for pediatric patients with symptomatic MMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from inception to March 17, 2024. For analysis of surgical vs conservative treatment, the primary and secondary outcomes were follow-up ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhagic events, respectively. For analysis of DB/CB vs IB, the primary outcome was follow-up ischemic stroke, and secondary outcomes included follow-up transient ischemic attack, new or worsened seizures, symptomatic improvement, modified Rankin Scale score ≤2, and Matsushima grade A at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two included studies yielded 1091 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 35.7 months. Regarding surgical vs conservative management, 428 patients were analyzed. Surgical treatment was associated with lower odds of ischemic stroke (odds ratios [OR] = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11-0.97], P = .04), and intracranial hemorrhagic events tended to be lower with surgery (OR = 0.25 [0.06-1.03], P = .05). Regarding DB/CB techniques vs IB, 875 patients were analyzed. The groups had similar rates of ischemic stroke (OR = 0.79 [0.31-1.97], P = .61), transient ischemic attack (OR = 1.27[0.46-3.55], P = .64), new or worsened seizures (OR = 1.05[0.3-3.65], P = .93), symptomatic improvement (OR = 2.45[0.71-8.45], P = .16), and follow-up modified Rankin Scale ≤2 (OR = 1.21 [0.16-8.85], P = .85). CB was associated with higher Matsushima grade A relative to IB (OR = 3.44 [1.32-9.97], P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical revascularization yielded more favorable clinical outcomes than conservative management in this meta-analysis. Clinical outcomes were similar between DB/CB vs IB techniques. Surgical flow augmentation, either by DB/CB or IB, seems to benefit pediatric patients with symptomatic MMD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003277\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Management of Symptomatic Moyamoya Disease in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background and objectives: The optimal management strategy for pediatric patients with symptomatic moyamoya disease (MMD) is not well established. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares surgical vs conservative management and direct/combined bypass (DB/CB) vs indirect bypass (IB) for pediatric patients with symptomatic MMD.
Methods: MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from inception to March 17, 2024. For analysis of surgical vs conservative treatment, the primary and secondary outcomes were follow-up ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhagic events, respectively. For analysis of DB/CB vs IB, the primary outcome was follow-up ischemic stroke, and secondary outcomes included follow-up transient ischemic attack, new or worsened seizures, symptomatic improvement, modified Rankin Scale score ≤2, and Matsushima grade A at the last follow-up.
Results: Twenty-two included studies yielded 1091 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 35.7 months. Regarding surgical vs conservative management, 428 patients were analyzed. Surgical treatment was associated with lower odds of ischemic stroke (odds ratios [OR] = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11-0.97], P = .04), and intracranial hemorrhagic events tended to be lower with surgery (OR = 0.25 [0.06-1.03], P = .05). Regarding DB/CB techniques vs IB, 875 patients were analyzed. The groups had similar rates of ischemic stroke (OR = 0.79 [0.31-1.97], P = .61), transient ischemic attack (OR = 1.27[0.46-3.55], P = .64), new or worsened seizures (OR = 1.05[0.3-3.65], P = .93), symptomatic improvement (OR = 2.45[0.71-8.45], P = .16), and follow-up modified Rankin Scale ≤2 (OR = 1.21 [0.16-8.85], P = .85). CB was associated with higher Matsushima grade A relative to IB (OR = 3.44 [1.32-9.97], P = .01).
Conclusion: Surgical revascularization yielded more favorable clinical outcomes than conservative management in this meta-analysis. Clinical outcomes were similar between DB/CB vs IB techniques. Surgical flow augmentation, either by DB/CB or IB, seems to benefit pediatric patients with symptomatic MMD.
期刊介绍：
Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery.
Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
