胶质瘤手术中清醒和睡眠状态下运动图谱的疗效比较:对 3011 例患者的荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dina Essam Abo-Elnour, Pavel Salvador Pichardo-Rojas, Yomna Emad Abdalla, Moaz Khaled Salama, Toka Elboraay, Marwa Abdelazim Rizk, Ahmed Negida, Ahmed M Raslan
{"title":"胶质瘤手术中清醒和睡眠状态下运动图谱的疗效比较:对 3011 例患者的荟萃分析。","authors":"Dina Essam Abo-Elnour, Pavel Salvador Pichardo-Rojas, Yomna Emad Abdalla, Moaz Khaled Salama, Toka Elboraay, Marwa Abdelazim Rizk, Ahmed Negida, Ahmed M Raslan","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03080-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Standard of care in glioma surgery involves maximal-safe resection. Intraoperative stimulation mapping can improve the extent of resection in eloquent area tumors. Resection is performed during awake craniotomy (AC) or under general anesthesia (GA). Considering the advances in glioma management, an updated meta-analysis is needed. We identified studies evaluating surgical outcomes in adult patients undergoing glioma resection in motor areas, comparing AC and GA mapping until November 2023. Twenty-four observational studies and one randomized controlled trial met our inclusion criteria, adding 3011 patients. The mean extent of resection was 92.2% (95%CI = 89.9%-94.5%) for AC and 92.5% (95%CI = 89.6%-95.3%) for GA. Immediate deficit revealed a nonsignificant risk ratio (RR) of 0.96 favoring AC (95%CI = 0.66-1.41, p = 0.84). Similarly, long-term deficits showed a nonsignificant RR of 1.33 favoring GA (95%CI = 0.91-1.95, p = 0.14). Karnofsky performance score (KPS) analysis revealed a nonsignificant mean difference of 2.32 favoring GA (95%CI = -6.10-10.73, p = 0.59). Intraoperative stimulation-induced seizures analysis yielded a nonsignificant RR of 0.73 (95% CI = 0.27-1.97, p = 0.53) favoring AC. Postoperative seizure analysis showed a significant RR of 0.64 (95% CI = 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02) favoring AC. This meta-analysis suggests that AC and GA are comparable approaches to maximize extent of resection and achieve safe resection in eloquent glioma surgery. These findings can offer guidance to neurosurgeons in the decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"859"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of awake and asleep motor mapping in glioma surgery: A meta-analysis of 3011 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Dina Essam Abo-Elnour, Pavel Salvador Pichardo-Rojas, Yomna Emad Abdalla, Moaz Khaled Salama, Toka Elboraay, Marwa Abdelazim Rizk, Ahmed Negida, Ahmed M Raslan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-024-03080-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Standard of care in glioma surgery involves maximal-safe resection. Intraoperative stimulation mapping can improve the extent of resection in eloquent area tumors. Resection is performed during awake craniotomy (AC) or under general anesthesia (GA). Considering the advances in glioma management, an updated meta-analysis is needed. We identified studies evaluating surgical outcomes in adult patients undergoing glioma resection in motor areas, comparing AC and GA mapping until November 2023. Twenty-four observational studies and one randomized controlled trial met our inclusion criteria, adding 3011 patients. The mean extent of resection was 92.2% (95%CI = 89.9%-94.5%) for AC and 92.5% (95%CI = 89.6%-95.3%) for GA. Immediate deficit revealed a nonsignificant risk ratio (RR) of 0.96 favoring AC (95%CI = 0.66-1.41, p = 0.84). Similarly, long-term deficits showed a nonsignificant RR of 1.33 favoring GA (95%CI = 0.91-1.95, p = 0.14). Karnofsky performance score (KPS) analysis revealed a nonsignificant mean difference of 2.32 favoring GA (95%CI = -6.10-10.73, p = 0.59). Intraoperative stimulation-induced seizures analysis yielded a nonsignificant RR of 0.73 (95% CI = 0.27-1.97, p = 0.53) favoring AC. Postoperative seizure analysis showed a significant RR of 0.64 (95% CI = 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02) favoring AC. This meta-analysis suggests that AC and GA are comparable approaches to maximize extent of resection and achieve safe resection in eloquent glioma surgery. These findings can offer guidance to neurosurgeons in the decision-making process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03080-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03080-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胶质瘤手术的标准护理包括最大限度的安全切除。术中刺激映射可改善对脑干区肿瘤的切除范围。切除手术在清醒开颅术(AC)或全身麻醉(GA)下进行。考虑到胶质瘤治疗的进步,我们需要更新荟萃分析。我们确定了截至 2023 年 11 月对接受运动区胶质瘤切除术的成年患者手术效果进行评估的研究,并对 AC 和 GA 映射进行了比较。24项观察性研究和1项随机对照试验符合我们的纳入标准,共纳入3011名患者。AC和GA的平均切除范围分别为92.2%(95%CI = 89.9%-94.5%)和92.5%(95%CI = 89.6%-95.3%)。近期缺陷显示 AC 的风险比 (RR) 为 0.96(95%CI = 0.66-1.41,P = 0.84),并不显著。同样,长期缺损显示 1.33 的非显著风险比(RR)更倾向于 GA(95%CI = 0.91-1.95,p = 0.14)。卡诺夫斯基表现评分(KPS)分析显示,GA 的平均差异为 2.32(95%CI = -6.10-10.73,P = 0.59),差异不显著。术中刺激诱发癫痫发作分析显示,AC 的 RR 为 0.73(95%CI = 0.27-1.97,p = 0.53),无显著性差异。术后癫痫发作分析显示,AC 的 RR 值为 0.64(95% CI = 0.44-0.94,p = 0.02),具有显著性。这项荟萃分析表明,AC和GA在最大限度地扩大切除范围和实现安全切除方面具有可比性。这些发现可为神经外科医生的决策过程提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy of awake and asleep motor mapping in glioma surgery: A meta-analysis of 3011 patients.

Standard of care in glioma surgery involves maximal-safe resection. Intraoperative stimulation mapping can improve the extent of resection in eloquent area tumors. Resection is performed during awake craniotomy (AC) or under general anesthesia (GA). Considering the advances in glioma management, an updated meta-analysis is needed. We identified studies evaluating surgical outcomes in adult patients undergoing glioma resection in motor areas, comparing AC and GA mapping until November 2023. Twenty-four observational studies and one randomized controlled trial met our inclusion criteria, adding 3011 patients. The mean extent of resection was 92.2% (95%CI = 89.9%-94.5%) for AC and 92.5% (95%CI = 89.6%-95.3%) for GA. Immediate deficit revealed a nonsignificant risk ratio (RR) of 0.96 favoring AC (95%CI = 0.66-1.41, p = 0.84). Similarly, long-term deficits showed a nonsignificant RR of 1.33 favoring GA (95%CI = 0.91-1.95, p = 0.14). Karnofsky performance score (KPS) analysis revealed a nonsignificant mean difference of 2.32 favoring GA (95%CI = -6.10-10.73, p = 0.59). Intraoperative stimulation-induced seizures analysis yielded a nonsignificant RR of 0.73 (95% CI = 0.27-1.97, p = 0.53) favoring AC. Postoperative seizure analysis showed a significant RR of 0.64 (95% CI = 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02) favoring AC. This meta-analysis suggests that AC and GA are comparable approaches to maximize extent of resection and achieve safe resection in eloquent glioma surgery. These findings can offer guidance to neurosurgeons in the decision-making process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信