改进消除盘尾丝虫病的监测工作:试验用气味诱饵埃斯佩兰萨窗口诱捕器收集黑蝇载体,并对黑蝇池中的卷尾丝虫进行实时 qPCR 检测。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
Monsuru A Adeleke, Kenneth N Opara, Hayward B Mafuyai, Bertram Ekejiuba Bright Nwoke, Olabanji A Surakat, Sunday B Akinde, Murphy Nwoke, Friday M Chikezie, Clement A Yaro, Ugagu Mmaduabuchi, Michael Igbe, Emeka Makata, Fatai Oyediran, Chukwuma Anyaike, Joseph Tongjura, Frances Hawkes, Zahra O Iwalewa
{"title":"改进消除盘尾丝虫病的监测工作:试验用气味诱饵埃斯佩兰萨窗口诱捕器收集黑蝇载体,并对黑蝇池中的卷尾丝虫进行实时 qPCR 检测。","authors":"Monsuru A Adeleke, Kenneth N Opara, Hayward B Mafuyai, Bertram Ekejiuba Bright Nwoke, Olabanji A Surakat, Sunday B Akinde, Murphy Nwoke, Friday M Chikezie, Clement A Yaro, Ugagu Mmaduabuchi, Michael Igbe, Emeka Makata, Fatai Oyediran, Chukwuma Anyaike, Joseph Tongjura, Frances Hawkes, Zahra O Iwalewa","doi":"10.1186/s13071-024-06554-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Entomological data for onchocerciasis surveillance relies on sampling black flies through human landing collectors in the field and laboratory testing of the flies for infection using pooled screening O-150 PCR-ELISA assay. Both techniques require improvements. This study aimed to optimize the Esperanza Window Trap (EWT) for black fly collection. We tested alternative carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) mimics to attract black flies to the traps. Additionally, we evaluated new quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods that target mitochondrial DNA markers and have been proposed to enhance the sensitivity and specificity for detecting Onchocerca volvulus infections in blackflies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Traps baited with low, medium and high release rates of either 2-butanone or cyclopentanone as CO<sub>2</sub> mimics were field tested against traps baited with organically generated CO<sub>2</sub> in four ecological zones in Nigeria: Guinea savannah, derived savannah, rainforest and montane forest. The performance of EWTs baited with CO<sub>2</sub> or in combination with 2-butanone (low release) were subsequently evaluated against the human landing collection (HLC). Trap scaling was also pilot tested by comparing two EWTs to a single HLC team. Collected black flies were used to test detection of O. volvulus in black flies using Ov ND5 real-time PCR (qPCR) compared to the conventional pool screening O-150 PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EWTs baited with 2-butanone caught similar numbers of black flies (Simulium damnosum s.l.) to those baited with CO<sub>2</sub>, while cyclopentanone collected significantly fewer flies in all locations. The low release of 2-butanone was the most effective overall, although HLCs collected higher numbers of black flies than EWT baited with CO<sub>2</sub> either singly or in combination with low-release 2-butanone. The combination of two EWTs baited with CO<sub>2</sub> and deployed 100 m apart from each other collected similar numbers of flies as one HLC. More black fly pools were positive for O. volvulus by Ov ND5 qPCR compared with O-150 PCR in derived savannah (31.15 vs. 15.57%), montane forest (11.54 vs. 0%) and rainforest (23.08 vs. 2.56%), with only one positive pool in Guinea savannah detected by both methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2-butanone has potential to be used in xenomonitoring as a standardized replacement for organically generated CO<sub>2</sub>. Ov ND5 qPCR detected more positive pools than O-150 PCR. The positive pools found in foci hitherto considered to have interrupted/eliminated onchocerciasis highlight the need for more sensitive and specific methods that support programmatic assessments to identify and combat recrudescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19793,"journal":{"name":"Parasites & Vectors","volume":"17 1","pages":"471"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving onchocerciasis elimination surveillance: trials of odour baited Esperanza Window Traps to collect black fly vectors and real-time qPCR detection of Onchocerca volvulus in black fly pools.\",\"authors\":\"Monsuru A Adeleke, Kenneth N Opara, Hayward B Mafuyai, Bertram Ekejiuba Bright Nwoke, Olabanji A Surakat, Sunday B Akinde, Murphy Nwoke, Friday M Chikezie, Clement A Yaro, Ugagu Mmaduabuchi, Michael Igbe, Emeka Makata, Fatai Oyediran, Chukwuma Anyaike, Joseph Tongjura, Frances Hawkes, Zahra O Iwalewa\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13071-024-06554-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Entomological data for onchocerciasis surveillance relies on sampling black flies through human landing collectors in the field and laboratory testing of the flies for infection using pooled screening O-150 PCR-ELISA assay. Both techniques require improvements. This study aimed to optimize the Esperanza Window Trap (EWT) for black fly collection. We tested alternative carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) mimics to attract black flies to the traps. Additionally, we evaluated new quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods that target mitochondrial DNA markers and have been proposed to enhance the sensitivity and specificity for detecting Onchocerca volvulus infections in blackflies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Traps baited with low, medium and high release rates of either 2-butanone or cyclopentanone as CO<sub>2</sub> mimics were field tested against traps baited with organically generated CO<sub>2</sub> in four ecological zones in Nigeria: Guinea savannah, derived savannah, rainforest and montane forest. The performance of EWTs baited with CO<sub>2</sub> or in combination with 2-butanone (low release) were subsequently evaluated against the human landing collection (HLC). Trap scaling was also pilot tested by comparing two EWTs to a single HLC team. Collected black flies were used to test detection of O. volvulus in black flies using Ov ND5 real-time PCR (qPCR) compared to the conventional pool screening O-150 PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EWTs baited with 2-butanone caught similar numbers of black flies (Simulium damnosum s.l.) to those baited with CO<sub>2</sub>, while cyclopentanone collected significantly fewer flies in all locations. The low release of 2-butanone was the most effective overall, although HLCs collected higher numbers of black flies than EWT baited with CO<sub>2</sub> either singly or in combination with low-release 2-butanone. The combination of two EWTs baited with CO<sub>2</sub> and deployed 100 m apart from each other collected similar numbers of flies as one HLC. More black fly pools were positive for O. volvulus by Ov ND5 qPCR compared with O-150 PCR in derived savannah (31.15 vs. 15.57%), montane forest (11.54 vs. 0%) and rainforest (23.08 vs. 2.56%), with only one positive pool in Guinea savannah detected by both methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2-butanone has potential to be used in xenomonitoring as a standardized replacement for organically generated CO<sub>2</sub>. Ov ND5 qPCR detected more positive pools than O-150 PCR. The positive pools found in foci hitherto considered to have interrupted/eliminated onchocerciasis highlight the need for more sensitive and specific methods that support programmatic assessments to identify and combat recrudescence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parasites & Vectors\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parasites & Vectors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06554-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasites & Vectors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06554-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:用于监测盘尾丝虫病的昆虫学数据依赖于在野外通过人体着陆采集器对黑蝇进行采样,以及使用集中筛选 O-150 PCR-ELISA 检测法对黑蝇进行感染实验室检测。这两种技术都需要改进。本研究旨在优化用于收集黑蝇的埃斯佩兰萨窗口诱捕器(EWT)。我们测试了其他二氧化碳(CO2)模拟物,以吸引黑蝇进入诱捕器。此外,我们还评估了新的定量 PCR(qPCR)方法,该方法以线粒体 DNA 标记为目标,被建议用于提高检测黑蝇中伏蚊子感染的灵敏度和特异性:在尼日利亚的四个生态区中,使用低、中、高释放率的 2-丁酮或环戊酮作为二氧化碳模拟物的诱捕器与使用有机产生的二氧化碳作为诱饵的诱捕器进行了实地测试:在尼日利亚的四个生态区:几内亚热带草原、衍生热带草原、热带雨林和山地森林,与以有机产生的二氧化碳为诱饵的诱捕器进行了实地测试。随后,针对人类着陆采集物(HLC)评估了以二氧化碳或结合 2-丁酮(低释放量)为诱饵的 EWT 的性能。通过比较两个 EWT 和一个 HLC 小组,还对诱捕规模进行了试点测试。使用 Ov ND5 实时 PCR (qPCR)与传统的池筛 O-150 PCR 相比,对收集的黑蝇进行了检测:结果:使用 2-butanone 诱饵的电子捕捉器捕捉到的黑蝇(Simulium damnosum s.l.)数量与使用二氧化碳诱饵的电子捕捉器相似,而环戊酮在所有地点捕捉到的黑蝇数量明显较少。低释放量的 2-丁酮总体上是最有效的,尽管 HLC 比单独使用二氧化碳或与低释放量的 2-丁酮结合使用的 EWT 捕获的黑蝇数量更高。两只以二氧化碳为诱饵的 EWT 相距 100 米,其捕获的苍蝇数量与一只 HLC 相近。在热带稀树草原(31.15% 对 15.57%)、山地森林(11.54% 对 0%)和热带雨林(23.08% 对 2.56%)中,用 Ov ND5 qPCR 与 O-150 PCR 相比,有更多的黑蝇池对 O. volvulus 呈阳性反应,而在几内亚热带稀树草原,两种方法都只检测到一个阳性池:结论:2-丁酮作为有机产生的二氧化碳的标准化替代品,有望用于异种监测。Ov ND5 qPCR 比 O-150 PCR 检测到更多的阳性库。在迄今为止被认为已中断/消除盘尾丝虫病的病灶中发现的阳性库突出表明,有必要采用更灵敏、更特异的方法来支持方案评估,以确定和打击盘尾丝虫病的复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving onchocerciasis elimination surveillance: trials of odour baited Esperanza Window Traps to collect black fly vectors and real-time qPCR detection of Onchocerca volvulus in black fly pools.

Background: Entomological data for onchocerciasis surveillance relies on sampling black flies through human landing collectors in the field and laboratory testing of the flies for infection using pooled screening O-150 PCR-ELISA assay. Both techniques require improvements. This study aimed to optimize the Esperanza Window Trap (EWT) for black fly collection. We tested alternative carbon dioxide (CO2) mimics to attract black flies to the traps. Additionally, we evaluated new quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods that target mitochondrial DNA markers and have been proposed to enhance the sensitivity and specificity for detecting Onchocerca volvulus infections in blackflies.

Methods: Traps baited with low, medium and high release rates of either 2-butanone or cyclopentanone as CO2 mimics were field tested against traps baited with organically generated CO2 in four ecological zones in Nigeria: Guinea savannah, derived savannah, rainforest and montane forest. The performance of EWTs baited with CO2 or in combination with 2-butanone (low release) were subsequently evaluated against the human landing collection (HLC). Trap scaling was also pilot tested by comparing two EWTs to a single HLC team. Collected black flies were used to test detection of O. volvulus in black flies using Ov ND5 real-time PCR (qPCR) compared to the conventional pool screening O-150 PCR.

Results: EWTs baited with 2-butanone caught similar numbers of black flies (Simulium damnosum s.l.) to those baited with CO2, while cyclopentanone collected significantly fewer flies in all locations. The low release of 2-butanone was the most effective overall, although HLCs collected higher numbers of black flies than EWT baited with CO2 either singly or in combination with low-release 2-butanone. The combination of two EWTs baited with CO2 and deployed 100 m apart from each other collected similar numbers of flies as one HLC. More black fly pools were positive for O. volvulus by Ov ND5 qPCR compared with O-150 PCR in derived savannah (31.15 vs. 15.57%), montane forest (11.54 vs. 0%) and rainforest (23.08 vs. 2.56%), with only one positive pool in Guinea savannah detected by both methods.

Conclusions: The 2-butanone has potential to be used in xenomonitoring as a standardized replacement for organically generated CO2. Ov ND5 qPCR detected more positive pools than O-150 PCR. The positive pools found in foci hitherto considered to have interrupted/eliminated onchocerciasis highlight the need for more sensitive and specific methods that support programmatic assessments to identify and combat recrudescence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parasites & Vectors
Parasites & Vectors 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
433
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Parasites & Vectors is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal dealing with the biology of parasites, parasitic diseases, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens. Manuscripts published in this journal will be available to all worldwide, with no barriers to access, immediately following acceptance. However, authors retain the copyright of their material and may use it, or distribute it, as they wish. Manuscripts on all aspects of the basic and applied biology of parasites, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens will be considered. In addition to the traditional and well-established areas of science in these fields, we also aim to provide a vehicle for publication of the rapidly developing resources and technology in parasite, intermediate host and vector genomics and their impacts on biological research. We are able to publish large datasets and extensive results, frequently associated with genomic and post-genomic technologies, which are not readily accommodated in traditional journals. Manuscripts addressing broader issues, for example economics, social sciences and global climate change in relation to parasites, vectors and disease control, are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信