从双膦酸盐到地诺单抗的序列治疗可改善绝经后骨质疏松症患者的腰椎骨矿物质密度:随机对照试验荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Xu Jiang, Siyi Hou, Xiaolei Deng, Liyou Hu, Jian Wang, Decai Hou
{"title":"从双膦酸盐到地诺单抗的序列治疗可改善绝经后骨质疏松症患者的腰椎骨矿物质密度:随机对照试验荟萃分析。","authors":"Xu Jiang, Siyi Hou, Xiaolei Deng, Liyou Hu, Jian Wang, Decai Hou","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bisphosphonates are effective in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, their prolonged use induces adverse events and may lead to a rapid decline in bone mineral density (BMD) after discontinuation. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody, is a widely used antiresorptive agent that is more effective than bisphosphonates in improving bone density. Whether sequential treatment with denosumab after bisphosphonate therapy can maintain or further increase BMD at all sites has not been conclusively demonstrated. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of this sequential therapy on BMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from December 1, 1986, to May 2, 2024, for all RCTs that assessed the efficacy of sequential therapy of bisphosphonate transition to denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. BMD changes at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip were used as outcomes. We assessed methodological quality, extracted relevant data according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, applied random-effects models for meta-analyses, performed heterogeneity analyses, and assessed publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3290 patients from 4 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Forest plot analysis showed that sequential treatment with bisphosphonate-denosumab was associated with higher lumbar spine BMD gain than continuous bisphosphonate treatment [mean difference (MD) = 5.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.26-5.75, I2 = 32.88%). No risk of bias was observed for the 4 trials, but there was an increase in femoral neck and total hip BMD. Moreover, analyses could not be performed because of high heterogeneity (femoral neck BMD: MD = 3.85, 95% CI = 2.84-4.85, I2 = 97.88%; total hip BMD: MD = 5.65, 95% CI = 4.28-7.02, I2 = 97.91%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sequential therapy that involves a transition from bisphosphonates to denosumab had a positive effect on lumbar spine bone density, and this type of therapy may be a potential treatment option for increasing lumbar spine bone density in postmenopausal women.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e40594"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequential treatment from bisphosphonate to denosumab improves lumbar spine bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Xu Jiang, Siyi Hou, Xiaolei Deng, Liyou Hu, Jian Wang, Decai Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000040594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bisphosphonates are effective in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, their prolonged use induces adverse events and may lead to a rapid decline in bone mineral density (BMD) after discontinuation. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody, is a widely used antiresorptive agent that is more effective than bisphosphonates in improving bone density. Whether sequential treatment with denosumab after bisphosphonate therapy can maintain or further increase BMD at all sites has not been conclusively demonstrated. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of this sequential therapy on BMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from December 1, 1986, to May 2, 2024, for all RCTs that assessed the efficacy of sequential therapy of bisphosphonate transition to denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. BMD changes at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip were used as outcomes. We assessed methodological quality, extracted relevant data according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, applied random-effects models for meta-analyses, performed heterogeneity analyses, and assessed publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3290 patients from 4 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Forest plot analysis showed that sequential treatment with bisphosphonate-denosumab was associated with higher lumbar spine BMD gain than continuous bisphosphonate treatment [mean difference (MD) = 5.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.26-5.75, I2 = 32.88%). No risk of bias was observed for the 4 trials, but there was an increase in femoral neck and total hip BMD. Moreover, analyses could not be performed because of high heterogeneity (femoral neck BMD: MD = 3.85, 95% CI = 2.84-4.85, I2 = 97.88%; total hip BMD: MD = 5.65, 95% CI = 4.28-7.02, I2 = 97.91%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sequential therapy that involves a transition from bisphosphonates to denosumab had a positive effect on lumbar spine bone density, and this type of therapy may be a potential treatment option for increasing lumbar spine bone density in postmenopausal women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":\"103 46\",\"pages\":\"e40594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576034/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040594\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:双膦酸盐可有效治疗绝经后骨质疏松症。然而,长期使用会引起不良反应,并可能导致停药后骨矿物质密度(BMD)迅速下降。地诺单抗是一种人类单克隆抗体,是一种广泛使用的抗骨吸收药物,在改善骨密度方面比双磷酸盐类药物更有效。在双膦酸盐治疗后连续使用地诺单抗是否能维持或进一步增加所有部位的 BMD 尚无定论。因此,我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估这种连续治疗对 BMD 的影响:我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中从 1986 年 12 月 1 日到 2024 年 5 月 2 日评估双膦酸盐过渡到地诺单抗序贯疗法对绝经后骨质疏松症女性疗效的所有 RCT。腰椎、股骨颈和全髋部的 BMD 变化作为研究结果。我们评估了方法学质量,根据《干预措施系统综述科克伦手册》提取了相关数据,采用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析,进行了异质性分析,并评估了发表偏倚:荟萃分析共纳入了来自 4 项 RCT 的 3290 名患者。森林图分析显示,与连续双膦酸盐治疗相比,双膦酸盐-地诺单抗序贯治疗与更高的腰椎BMD增量相关[平均差(MD)=5.50,95%置信区间(CI)=5.26-5.75,I2=32.88%]。4项试验均未发现偏倚风险,但股骨颈和全髋关节BMD有所增加。此外,由于异质性较高,无法进行分析(股骨颈BMD:MD = 3.85,95% CI = 2.84-4.85,I2 = 97.88%;全髋BMD:MD = 5.65,95% CI = 4.28-7.02,I2 = 97.91%):结论:从双磷酸盐过渡到地诺单抗的序列疗法对腰椎骨密度有积极影响,这种疗法可能是提高绝经后妇女腰椎骨密度的潜在治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sequential treatment from bisphosphonate to denosumab improves lumbar spine bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Bisphosphonates are effective in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, their prolonged use induces adverse events and may lead to a rapid decline in bone mineral density (BMD) after discontinuation. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody, is a widely used antiresorptive agent that is more effective than bisphosphonates in improving bone density. Whether sequential treatment with denosumab after bisphosphonate therapy can maintain or further increase BMD at all sites has not been conclusively demonstrated. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of this sequential therapy on BMD.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from December 1, 1986, to May 2, 2024, for all RCTs that assessed the efficacy of sequential therapy of bisphosphonate transition to denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. BMD changes at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip were used as outcomes. We assessed methodological quality, extracted relevant data according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, applied random-effects models for meta-analyses, performed heterogeneity analyses, and assessed publication bias.

Results: A total of 3290 patients from 4 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Forest plot analysis showed that sequential treatment with bisphosphonate-denosumab was associated with higher lumbar spine BMD gain than continuous bisphosphonate treatment [mean difference (MD) = 5.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.26-5.75, I2 = 32.88%). No risk of bias was observed for the 4 trials, but there was an increase in femoral neck and total hip BMD. Moreover, analyses could not be performed because of high heterogeneity (femoral neck BMD: MD = 3.85, 95% CI = 2.84-4.85, I2 = 97.88%; total hip BMD: MD = 5.65, 95% CI = 4.28-7.02, I2 = 97.91%).

Conclusion: Sequential therapy that involves a transition from bisphosphonates to denosumab had a positive effect on lumbar spine bone density, and this type of therapy may be a potential treatment option for increasing lumbar spine bone density in postmenopausal women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信