聚焦体外冲击波疗法对颈椎病患者疗效的临床评估:随机对照试验。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shuangyue Li, Jie Liu, Yan Wang, Chan Zhu, Yahong Tang, Minghong Gu
{"title":"聚焦体外冲击波疗法对颈椎病患者疗效的临床评估:随机对照试验。","authors":"Shuangyue Li, Jie Liu, Yan Wang, Chan Zhu, Yahong Tang, Minghong Gu","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a contemporary modality in physiotherapy, demonstrating efficacy in addressing musculoskeletal disorders. Despite its potential, the clinical efficacy of ESWT in the context of cervical spondylosis remains understudied, with a dearth of robust empirical evidence. To bridge this gap, the present study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic impact of focused ESWT (fESWT) on pain alleviation and functional improvement in individuals afflicted with cervical spondylosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study was conducted, collecting data from 5 clinical studies on the treatment of cervical spondylosis with fESWT from June 2021 to March 2024. The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis, aged 20 to 70, without severe underlying diseases such as heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, etc. The exclusion criteria included pregnant women, nursing women, patients with bleeding tendencies, or those with cardiac pacemakers. The control group underwent a sham fESWT, while the experimental group received fESWT administered via the Duolith SD1 Tower device. The main observation indicators included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain scoring, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scoring, cervical range of motion (ROM) scoring, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) quality of life survey scoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 320 subjects were included in the study, with 160 in the experimental group and 160 in the control group. Post-treatment, the VAS and NDI scores in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < .05), while the cervical range of motion (ROM) and SF-36 scores were significantly higher than in the control group (P < .05). The overall treatment efficacy rate in the experimental group exceeded 90%, markedly higher than the approximately 70% rate in the control group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fESWT has shown promising therapeutic effects in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. It effectively reduces patient pain, improves cervical function, and enhances the quality of life, making it worthy of clinical promotion and application.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e40573"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of focused extracorporeal shock-wave therapy in patients with cervical spondylosis: A randomized control trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shuangyue Li, Jie Liu, Yan Wang, Chan Zhu, Yahong Tang, Minghong Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000040573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a contemporary modality in physiotherapy, demonstrating efficacy in addressing musculoskeletal disorders. Despite its potential, the clinical efficacy of ESWT in the context of cervical spondylosis remains understudied, with a dearth of robust empirical evidence. To bridge this gap, the present study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic impact of focused ESWT (fESWT) on pain alleviation and functional improvement in individuals afflicted with cervical spondylosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study was conducted, collecting data from 5 clinical studies on the treatment of cervical spondylosis with fESWT from June 2021 to March 2024. The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis, aged 20 to 70, without severe underlying diseases such as heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, etc. The exclusion criteria included pregnant women, nursing women, patients with bleeding tendencies, or those with cardiac pacemakers. The control group underwent a sham fESWT, while the experimental group received fESWT administered via the Duolith SD1 Tower device. The main observation indicators included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain scoring, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scoring, cervical range of motion (ROM) scoring, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) quality of life survey scoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 320 subjects were included in the study, with 160 in the experimental group and 160 in the control group. Post-treatment, the VAS and NDI scores in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < .05), while the cervical range of motion (ROM) and SF-36 scores were significantly higher than in the control group (P < .05). The overall treatment efficacy rate in the experimental group exceeded 90%, markedly higher than the approximately 70% rate in the control group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fESWT has shown promising therapeutic effects in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. It effectively reduces patient pain, improves cervical function, and enhances the quality of life, making it worthy of clinical promotion and application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":\"103 46\",\"pages\":\"e40573\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576013/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040573\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体外冲击波疗法(ESWT体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)已成为当代物理治疗的一种方式,在治疗肌肉骨骼疾病方面具有显著疗效。尽管 ESWT 具有潜力,但其对颈椎病的临床疗效仍未得到充分研究,缺乏有力的经验证据。为了弥补这一不足,本研究旨在评估聚焦 ESWT(fESWT)对颈椎病患者疼痛缓解和功能改善的治疗效果:方法:开展了一项多中心随机对照临床研究,收集了 2021 年 6 月至 2024 年 3 月期间 5 项关于 fESWT 治疗颈椎病的临床研究数据。纳入标准为确诊为颈椎病的患者,年龄在 20 至 70 岁之间,无严重基础疾病,如心脏病、高血压、糖尿病等。排除标准包括孕妇、哺乳期妇女、有出血倾向的患者或使用心脏起搏器的患者。对照组接受假的 fESWT,而实验组则通过 Duolith SD1 塔式设备接受 fESWT。主要观察指标包括疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分、颈椎活动范围(ROM)评分和短表-36(SF-36)生活质量调查评分:共有 320 名受试者参加了研究,其中实验组 160 人,对照组 160 人。治疗后,实验组的 VAS 和 NDI 评分明显低于对照组(P 结论:实验组的 VAS 和 NDI 评分明显高于对照组(PfESWT 在治疗颈椎病方面具有良好的疗效。它能有效减轻患者疼痛,改善颈椎功能,提高生活质量,值得临床推广和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of focused extracorporeal shock-wave therapy in patients with cervical spondylosis: A randomized control trial.

Background: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a contemporary modality in physiotherapy, demonstrating efficacy in addressing musculoskeletal disorders. Despite its potential, the clinical efficacy of ESWT in the context of cervical spondylosis remains understudied, with a dearth of robust empirical evidence. To bridge this gap, the present study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic impact of focused ESWT (fESWT) on pain alleviation and functional improvement in individuals afflicted with cervical spondylosis.

Method: A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study was conducted, collecting data from 5 clinical studies on the treatment of cervical spondylosis with fESWT from June 2021 to March 2024. The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis, aged 20 to 70, without severe underlying diseases such as heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, etc. The exclusion criteria included pregnant women, nursing women, patients with bleeding tendencies, or those with cardiac pacemakers. The control group underwent a sham fESWT, while the experimental group received fESWT administered via the Duolith SD1 Tower device. The main observation indicators included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain scoring, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scoring, cervical range of motion (ROM) scoring, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) quality of life survey scoring.

Results: A total of 320 subjects were included in the study, with 160 in the experimental group and 160 in the control group. Post-treatment, the VAS and NDI scores in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < .05), while the cervical range of motion (ROM) and SF-36 scores were significantly higher than in the control group (P < .05). The overall treatment efficacy rate in the experimental group exceeded 90%, markedly higher than the approximately 70% rate in the control group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: The fESWT has shown promising therapeutic effects in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. It effectively reduces patient pain, improves cervical function, and enhances the quality of life, making it worthy of clinical promotion and application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信