Jingqi Zhang, Yilun Sui, Min Xiao, Xiaoxi Sun, Jing Fu
{"title":"评估钙离子导管对人工卵母细胞激活周期妊娠结局的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析的 10 年更新。","authors":"Jingqi Zhang, Yilun Sui, Min Xiao, Xiaoxi Sun, Jing Fu","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03319-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of calcium ionophore as an artificial oocyte activation (AOA) method on pregnancy outcomes in different groups of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) patients, providing potential evidence to establish consensus on the indications of AOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic comprehensive search was performed in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Studies published from January 2014 to June 2024 were searched for analysis. All studies that compared ICSI with AOA-ICSI in routine indications composing impaired fertilization or embryo developmental arrest in previous cycles, or male-factor infertility were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. AOA-ICSI was associated with the increase in the overall fertilization rate (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.16-3.41) and live birth rate (OR 4.58, 95% CI 1.52-13.80). All secondary outcomes including cleavage, blastocyst, high-quality embryo, implantation, biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy presented superiority or equivalence in AOA-ICSI. And the use of calcium ionophore did not increase the miscarriage rate (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.08-2.43). In subgroup analysis, AOA-ICSI exhibited a more significant effect on patients with indications of no or low fertilization. However, in patients with non-fertilization factors, no statistically significant improvements were observed in all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Calcium ionophore is an effective artificial oocyte activation approach to improving pregnancy outcomes after ICSI, particularly in cases with indications of fertilization factors, providing further support for the application of AOA in specific populations. Further validation is needed to comprehensively establish the safety of AOA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration number CRD42024551481.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of calcium ionophore on pregnancy outcomes in artificial oocyte activation cycles: a 10-year update of systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jingqi Zhang, Yilun Sui, Min Xiao, Xiaoxi Sun, Jing Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-024-03319-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of calcium ionophore as an artificial oocyte activation (AOA) method on pregnancy outcomes in different groups of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) patients, providing potential evidence to establish consensus on the indications of AOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic comprehensive search was performed in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Studies published from January 2014 to June 2024 were searched for analysis. All studies that compared ICSI with AOA-ICSI in routine indications composing impaired fertilization or embryo developmental arrest in previous cycles, or male-factor infertility were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. AOA-ICSI was associated with the increase in the overall fertilization rate (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.16-3.41) and live birth rate (OR 4.58, 95% CI 1.52-13.80). All secondary outcomes including cleavage, blastocyst, high-quality embryo, implantation, biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy presented superiority or equivalence in AOA-ICSI. And the use of calcium ionophore did not increase the miscarriage rate (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.08-2.43). In subgroup analysis, AOA-ICSI exhibited a more significant effect on patients with indications of no or low fertilization. However, in patients with non-fertilization factors, no statistically significant improvements were observed in all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Calcium ionophore is an effective artificial oocyte activation approach to improving pregnancy outcomes after ICSI, particularly in cases with indications of fertilization factors, providing further support for the application of AOA in specific populations. Further validation is needed to comprehensively establish the safety of AOA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration number CRD42024551481.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03319-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03319-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估人工卵母细胞激活(AOA)方法--钙离子体对不同群体卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)患者妊娠结局的有效性和安全性,为人工卵母细胞激活适应症达成共识提供潜在证据:在 Medline、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar 数据库中进行了系统全面的检索。检索分析的研究发表于 2014 年 1 月至 2024 年 6 月。纳入了所有在常规适应症中比较 ICSI 与 AOA-ICSI 的研究,这些适应症包括先前周期中受精受损或胚胎发育停滞,或男性因素不孕:结果:12 项研究被纳入荟萃分析。AOA-ICSI与总体受精率(OR 1.99,95% CI 1.16-3.41)和活产率(OR 4.58,95% CI 1.52-13.80)的提高有关。所有次要结果,包括卵裂、囊胚、优质胚胎、植入、生化妊娠、临床妊娠,均显示 AOA-ICSI 优于或等同于 AOA-ICSI。使用钙离子拮抗剂不会增加流产率(OR 0.43,95% CI 0.08-2.43)。在亚组分析中,AOA-ICSI 对无受精迹象或受精率低的患者有更显著的效果。然而,在有非受精因素的患者中,所有结果均未观察到有统计学意义的改善:结论:钙离子导管是一种有效的人工卵母细胞激活方法,可改善卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)后的妊娠结局,尤其是在有受精因素指征的病例中,为在特定人群中应用 AOA 提供了进一步支持。要全面确定AOA的安全性,还需要进一步的验证:试验注册:PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42024551481。
Assessing the impact of calcium ionophore on pregnancy outcomes in artificial oocyte activation cycles: a 10-year update of systematic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of calcium ionophore as an artificial oocyte activation (AOA) method on pregnancy outcomes in different groups of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) patients, providing potential evidence to establish consensus on the indications of AOA.
Methods: A systematic comprehensive search was performed in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Studies published from January 2014 to June 2024 were searched for analysis. All studies that compared ICSI with AOA-ICSI in routine indications composing impaired fertilization or embryo developmental arrest in previous cycles, or male-factor infertility were included.
Results: Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. AOA-ICSI was associated with the increase in the overall fertilization rate (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.16-3.41) and live birth rate (OR 4.58, 95% CI 1.52-13.80). All secondary outcomes including cleavage, blastocyst, high-quality embryo, implantation, biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy presented superiority or equivalence in AOA-ICSI. And the use of calcium ionophore did not increase the miscarriage rate (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.08-2.43). In subgroup analysis, AOA-ICSI exhibited a more significant effect on patients with indications of no or low fertilization. However, in patients with non-fertilization factors, no statistically significant improvements were observed in all outcomes.
Conclusion: Calcium ionophore is an effective artificial oocyte activation approach to improving pregnancy outcomes after ICSI, particularly in cases with indications of fertilization factors, providing further support for the application of AOA in specific populations. Further validation is needed to comprehensively establish the safety of AOA.
Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42024551481.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species.
The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.