观察钬激光前列腺去核术(HoLEP)治疗良性前列腺增生症的疗效和安全性,同时保留从膀胱颈到前列腺顶端的尿道粘膜。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lei Qiu, Zhibo Gu, Yongsheng Pan, Yong Zhang, Jiangang Chen
{"title":"观察钬激光前列腺去核术(HoLEP)治疗良性前列腺增生症的疗效和安全性,同时保留从膀胱颈到前列腺顶端的尿道粘膜。","authors":"Lei Qiu, Zhibo Gu, Yongsheng Pan, Yong Zhang, Jiangang Chen","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the efficacy and safety of transurethral prostate laser resection (HoLEP) with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A retrospective study was conducted on 208 patients with BPH treated at our hospital. In the control group, the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate was not retained during surgery to ensure maximum removal of possible diseased tissue. The urethral mucosa was preserved in the observation group, which was finely separated to avoid injury, in order to protect urinary control function to the greatest extent and reduce postoperative complications. The surgical-related indicators, urinary function, sexual function, quality of life (QOL), and occurrence of postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups of patients. After the procedure, both groups of patients experienced an increase in maximum flow rate and a decrease in residual urine volume (P < .05). The observation group showed a higher immediate postoperative urinary continence rate of 98.23% compared to 85.26% in the control group (P < .05). After the procedure, both groups of patients exhibited a significant increase in International index of erectile function-5 scores (P < .05). The retrograde ejaculation rates were compared between the 2 groups of patients before the procedure (P > .05). After the procedure, the occurrence rate of retrograde ejaculation decreased in both groups of patients, with the observation group being lower than the control group (P < .05). The International prostate symptom score (IPSS) scores and QOL scores were compared between the 2 groups of patients before and after the procedure (P > .05). After the procedure, both groups of patients showed a decrease in IPSS scores and QOL scores compared to before the procedure (P < .05). The occurrence of complications such as urethral injury, urinary incontinence, urinary retention, and postoperative bleeding was compared between the 2 groups of patients (P > .05). The efficacy and safety of performing HoLEP treatment for BPH patients with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate are comparable to those without preservation. However, it can improve immediate urinary continence rate and reduce retrograde ejaculation rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e40571"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observation on the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Lei Qiu, Zhibo Gu, Yongsheng Pan, Yong Zhang, Jiangang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000040571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates the efficacy and safety of transurethral prostate laser resection (HoLEP) with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A retrospective study was conducted on 208 patients with BPH treated at our hospital. In the control group, the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate was not retained during surgery to ensure maximum removal of possible diseased tissue. The urethral mucosa was preserved in the observation group, which was finely separated to avoid injury, in order to protect urinary control function to the greatest extent and reduce postoperative complications. The surgical-related indicators, urinary function, sexual function, quality of life (QOL), and occurrence of postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups of patients. After the procedure, both groups of patients experienced an increase in maximum flow rate and a decrease in residual urine volume (P < .05). The observation group showed a higher immediate postoperative urinary continence rate of 98.23% compared to 85.26% in the control group (P < .05). After the procedure, both groups of patients exhibited a significant increase in International index of erectile function-5 scores (P < .05). The retrograde ejaculation rates were compared between the 2 groups of patients before the procedure (P > .05). After the procedure, the occurrence rate of retrograde ejaculation decreased in both groups of patients, with the observation group being lower than the control group (P < .05). The International prostate symptom score (IPSS) scores and QOL scores were compared between the 2 groups of patients before and after the procedure (P > .05). After the procedure, both groups of patients showed a decrease in IPSS scores and QOL scores compared to before the procedure (P < .05). The occurrence of complications such as urethral injury, urinary incontinence, urinary retention, and postoperative bleeding was compared between the 2 groups of patients (P > .05). The efficacy and safety of performing HoLEP treatment for BPH patients with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate are comparable to those without preservation. However, it can improve immediate urinary continence rate and reduce retrograde ejaculation rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":\"103 46\",\"pages\":\"e40571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576042/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040571\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了经尿道前列腺激光切除术(HoLEP)治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的有效性和安全性,同时保留了从膀胱颈到前列腺顶端的尿道粘膜。我们对在本医院接受治疗的 208 名良性前列腺增生症患者进行了回顾性研究。在对照组中,手术中不保留从膀胱颈到前列腺顶端的尿道粘膜,以确保最大限度地切除可能的病变组织。观察组则保留尿道粘膜,进行精细分离,避免损伤,以最大程度保护控尿功能,减少术后并发症。比较两组患者的手术相关指标、排尿功能、性功能、生活质量(QOL)和术后并发症发生情况。术后,两组患者的最大流量均有所增加,残余尿量均有所减少(P .05)。术后,两组患者的逆行射精发生率均有所下降,观察组低于对照组(P .05)。术后,与术前相比,两组患者的 IPSS 评分和 QOL 评分均有所下降(P .05)。对保留膀胱颈至前列腺顶端尿道粘膜的良性前列腺增生症患者进行 HoLEP 治疗的有效性和安全性与未保留尿道粘膜的患者相当。但是,它可以提高即刻尿失禁率,降低逆行射精率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observation on the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

This study investigates the efficacy and safety of transurethral prostate laser resection (HoLEP) with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A retrospective study was conducted on 208 patients with BPH treated at our hospital. In the control group, the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate was not retained during surgery to ensure maximum removal of possible diseased tissue. The urethral mucosa was preserved in the observation group, which was finely separated to avoid injury, in order to protect urinary control function to the greatest extent and reduce postoperative complications. The surgical-related indicators, urinary function, sexual function, quality of life (QOL), and occurrence of postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups of patients. After the procedure, both groups of patients experienced an increase in maximum flow rate and a decrease in residual urine volume (P < .05). The observation group showed a higher immediate postoperative urinary continence rate of 98.23% compared to 85.26% in the control group (P < .05). After the procedure, both groups of patients exhibited a significant increase in International index of erectile function-5 scores (P < .05). The retrograde ejaculation rates were compared between the 2 groups of patients before the procedure (P > .05). After the procedure, the occurrence rate of retrograde ejaculation decreased in both groups of patients, with the observation group being lower than the control group (P < .05). The International prostate symptom score (IPSS) scores and QOL scores were compared between the 2 groups of patients before and after the procedure (P > .05). After the procedure, both groups of patients showed a decrease in IPSS scores and QOL scores compared to before the procedure (P < .05). The occurrence of complications such as urethral injury, urinary incontinence, urinary retention, and postoperative bleeding was compared between the 2 groups of patients (P > .05). The efficacy and safety of performing HoLEP treatment for BPH patients with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate are comparable to those without preservation. However, it can improve immediate urinary continence rate and reduce retrograde ejaculation rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信