特米沙坦、氨氯地平和瑞舒伐他汀三联疗法(TAR)与特米沙坦/氨氯地平(TA)和特米沙坦/瑞舒伐他汀组合(TR)治疗高血压和血脂异常:系统综述与元分析》。

IF 3.1 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Shady Habboush, Navyamani V Kagita, Ahmed F Gadelmawla, Ahmed Elmoursi, Nooraldin Merza, Ahmed A Abdo, Al Hussein M Zahran, Moustafa Eldeib, Alsayed A Almarghany, Mohamed M Abdelfadil, Mohamed A Abdelkarim, Islam Shawky, Omar M Mohammed, Abdullah Alharran, Mahmoud M Ali, Shereef Elbardisy
{"title":"特米沙坦、氨氯地平和瑞舒伐他汀三联疗法(TAR)与特米沙坦/氨氯地平(TA)和特米沙坦/瑞舒伐他汀组合(TR)治疗高血压和血脂异常:系统综述与元分析》。","authors":"Shady Habboush, Navyamani V Kagita, Ahmed F Gadelmawla, Ahmed Elmoursi, Nooraldin Merza, Ahmed A Abdo, Al Hussein M Zahran, Moustafa Eldeib, Alsayed A Almarghany, Mohamed M Abdelfadil, Mohamed A Abdelkarim, Islam Shawky, Omar M Mohammed, Abdullah Alharran, Mahmoud M Ali, Shereef Elbardisy","doi":"10.1007/s40292-024-00689-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypertension and dyslipidemia are common contributors to cardiovascular disease (CVD), often occurring together. Effectively Managing both is key to reducing mortality and morbidity, but complex regimens reduce adherence.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of a three-drug regimen (TAR) containing telmisartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin against two-drug combinations (TA and TR) for managing hypertension and dyslipidemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases for relevant articles matching our inclusion criteria. Following the application of inclusion criteria, four studies were selected for qualitative analysis and four studies for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis showed TAR [n = 155] significantly reduced mean systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) at week 4 compared to TR (n = 163) (MD = -15.65 mmHg) and TA (MD = -4.63 mmHg). TAR also showed superiority over all groups (TR [n = 163], TA [n = 162]) in MSSBP reduction. For low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), TAR only showed a significant difference at week 4 compared to TA (MD = -86.41 mg/dL), with no difference between TAR and TR at either week 4 or 8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that TAR may be a safe and effective therapeutic option for the concurrent management of hypertension and dyslipidemia. However, there is no significant difference regarding adverse events between both arms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12890,"journal":{"name":"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triple Therapy with Telmisartan, Amlodipine, and Rosuvastatin (TAR) Versus Telmisartan/Amlodipine (TA) and Telmisartan/Rosuvastatin (TR) Combinations in Hypertension and Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shady Habboush, Navyamani V Kagita, Ahmed F Gadelmawla, Ahmed Elmoursi, Nooraldin Merza, Ahmed A Abdo, Al Hussein M Zahran, Moustafa Eldeib, Alsayed A Almarghany, Mohamed M Abdelfadil, Mohamed A Abdelkarim, Islam Shawky, Omar M Mohammed, Abdullah Alharran, Mahmoud M Ali, Shereef Elbardisy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40292-024-00689-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypertension and dyslipidemia are common contributors to cardiovascular disease (CVD), often occurring together. Effectively Managing both is key to reducing mortality and morbidity, but complex regimens reduce adherence.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of a three-drug regimen (TAR) containing telmisartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin against two-drug combinations (TA and TR) for managing hypertension and dyslipidemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases for relevant articles matching our inclusion criteria. Following the application of inclusion criteria, four studies were selected for qualitative analysis and four studies for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis showed TAR [n = 155] significantly reduced mean systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) at week 4 compared to TR (n = 163) (MD = -15.65 mmHg) and TA (MD = -4.63 mmHg). TAR also showed superiority over all groups (TR [n = 163], TA [n = 162]) in MSSBP reduction. For low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), TAR only showed a significant difference at week 4 compared to TA (MD = -86.41 mg/dL), with no difference between TAR and TR at either week 4 or 8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that TAR may be a safe and effective therapeutic option for the concurrent management of hypertension and dyslipidemia. However, there is no significant difference regarding adverse events between both arms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-024-00689-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-024-00689-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:高血压和血脂异常是心血管疾病(CVD)的常见诱因,通常同时发生。目的:本研究调查了含有替米沙坦、氨氯地平和罗伐他汀的三药治疗方案(TAR)与两药组合(TA和TR)治疗高血压和血脂异常的疗效和安全性比较:我们在 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库中搜索符合纳入标准的相关文章。根据纳入标准,我们选择了 4 项研究进行定性分析,4 项研究进行荟萃分析:我们的分析表明,与 TR(n = 163)(MD = -15.65 mmHg)和 TA(MD = -4.63 mmHg)相比,TAR [n = 155]能显著降低第 4 周的平均收缩压(MSSBP)。在降低 MSSBP 方面,TAR 也优于所有组别(TR [n = 163]、TA [n = 162])。在低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)方面,TAR仅在第4周与TA相比有显著差异(MD = -86.41毫克/分升),而在第4周或第8周,TAR与TR均无差异:我们的研究结果表明,TAR 是同时治疗高血压和血脂异常的一种安全有效的治疗方案。但是,两组患者在不良反应方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Triple Therapy with Telmisartan, Amlodipine, and Rosuvastatin (TAR) Versus Telmisartan/Amlodipine (TA) and Telmisartan/Rosuvastatin (TR) Combinations in Hypertension and Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Introduction: Hypertension and dyslipidemia are common contributors to cardiovascular disease (CVD), often occurring together. Effectively Managing both is key to reducing mortality and morbidity, but complex regimens reduce adherence.

Aim: This study investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of a three-drug regimen (TAR) containing telmisartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin against two-drug combinations (TA and TR) for managing hypertension and dyslipidemia.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases for relevant articles matching our inclusion criteria. Following the application of inclusion criteria, four studies were selected for qualitative analysis and four studies for meta-analysis.

Results: Our analysis showed TAR [n = 155] significantly reduced mean systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) at week 4 compared to TR (n = 163) (MD = -15.65 mmHg) and TA (MD = -4.63 mmHg). TAR also showed superiority over all groups (TR [n = 163], TA [n = 162]) in MSSBP reduction. For low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), TAR only showed a significant difference at week 4 compared to TA (MD = -86.41 mg/dL), with no difference between TAR and TR at either week 4 or 8.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that TAR may be a safe and effective therapeutic option for the concurrent management of hypertension and dyslipidemia. However, there is no significant difference regarding adverse events between both arms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention promotes knowledge, update and discussion in the field of hypertension and cardiovascular disease prevention, by providing a regular programme of independent review articles covering key aspects of the management of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The journal includes:   Invited ''State of the Art'' reviews.  Expert commentaries on guidelines, major trials, technical advances.Presentation of new intervention trials design.''Pros and Cons'' or round tables on controversial issues.Statements on guidelines from hypertension and cardiovascular scientific societies.Socio-economic issues.Cost/benefit in prevention of cardiovascular diseases.Monitoring of healthcare systems.News and views from the Italian Society of Hypertension (including abstracts).All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信