婚姻状况是女性阴道癌患者生存期的独立预后因素:来自 SEER 数据库分析的证据。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Yanhong Xu, Xinru Shu, Wenhuang Xu, Yiming Hu
{"title":"婚姻状况是女性阴道癌患者生存期的独立预后因素:来自 SEER 数据库分析的证据。","authors":"Yanhong Xu, Xinru Shu, Wenhuang Xu, Yiming Hu","doi":"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of marital status on the survival outcomes of women diagnosed with vaginal cancer, considering the potential role of sociodemographic factors in patient prognosis. Utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, the study included 6046 women with primary vaginal cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed to balance comparison groups and account for confounding factors. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), with Cox proportional-hazards regression models used for statistical analysis. Married patients exhibited better survival outcomes than their unmarried counterparts [OS: hazard ratio = 1.520, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.430-1.630, P < 0.001; CSS: hazard ratio = 1.380, 95% CI = 1.270-1.490, P < 0.001]. Subgroup analyses stratified by age and race highlighted a significant survival benefit for married individuals, particularly those aged 50-69 years and white patients. After PSM, the widowed subgroup within the unmarried category showed worse survival outcomes (OS: hazard ratio = 1.580, 95% CI = 1.430-1.750, P < 0.001; CSS: hazard ratio = 1.360, 95% CI = 1.200-1.530, P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that marital status serves as an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS among patients with primary vaginal cancer, which supports that unmarried people need more individualized care strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11830,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marital status as an independent prognostic factor for survival in women with vaginal cancer: evidence from the SEER database analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yanhong Xu, Xinru Shu, Wenhuang Xu, Yiming Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of marital status on the survival outcomes of women diagnosed with vaginal cancer, considering the potential role of sociodemographic factors in patient prognosis. Utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, the study included 6046 women with primary vaginal cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed to balance comparison groups and account for confounding factors. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), with Cox proportional-hazards regression models used for statistical analysis. Married patients exhibited better survival outcomes than their unmarried counterparts [OS: hazard ratio = 1.520, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.430-1.630, P < 0.001; CSS: hazard ratio = 1.380, 95% CI = 1.270-1.490, P < 0.001]. Subgroup analyses stratified by age and race highlighted a significant survival benefit for married individuals, particularly those aged 50-69 years and white patients. After PSM, the widowed subgroup within the unmarried category showed worse survival outcomes (OS: hazard ratio = 1.580, 95% CI = 1.430-1.750, P < 0.001; CSS: hazard ratio = 1.360, 95% CI = 1.200-1.530, P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that marital status serves as an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS among patients with primary vaginal cancer, which supports that unmarried people need more individualized care strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000938\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到社会人口因素在患者预后中的潜在作用,本研究旨在评估婚姻状况对确诊为阴道癌的女性生存结果的影响。研究利用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中的数据,纳入了 6046 名在 2000 年至 2020 年期间确诊患有原发性阴道癌的女性。研究采用倾向得分匹配法(PSM)来平衡比较组并考虑混杂因素。研究的主要结果是总生存率(OS)和癌症特异性生存率(CSS),并采用 Cox 比例危险回归模型进行统计分析。已婚患者的生存率高于未婚患者[OS:危险比 = 1.520,95% 置信区间 (CI) = 1.430-1.630,P < 0.001;CSS:危险比 = 1.380,95% CI = 1.270-1.490,P < 0.001]。按年龄和种族分层的亚组分析显示,已婚者,尤其是年龄在 50-69 岁之间的已婚者和白人患者的生存率显著提高。在 PSM 后,未婚类别中的丧偶亚组显示出更差的生存结果(OS:危险比 = 1.580,95% CI = 1.430-1.750,P <0.001;CSS:危险比 = 1.360,95% CI = 1.200-1.530,P <0.001)。这项研究表明,婚姻状况是原发性阴道癌患者OS和CSS的独立预后因素,这支持了未婚者需要更多个体化护理策略的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marital status as an independent prognostic factor for survival in women with vaginal cancer: evidence from the SEER database analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of marital status on the survival outcomes of women diagnosed with vaginal cancer, considering the potential role of sociodemographic factors in patient prognosis. Utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, the study included 6046 women with primary vaginal cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed to balance comparison groups and account for confounding factors. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), with Cox proportional-hazards regression models used for statistical analysis. Married patients exhibited better survival outcomes than their unmarried counterparts [OS: hazard ratio = 1.520, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.430-1.630, P < 0.001; CSS: hazard ratio = 1.380, 95% CI = 1.270-1.490, P < 0.001]. Subgroup analyses stratified by age and race highlighted a significant survival benefit for married individuals, particularly those aged 50-69 years and white patients. After PSM, the widowed subgroup within the unmarried category showed worse survival outcomes (OS: hazard ratio = 1.580, 95% CI = 1.430-1.750, P < 0.001; CSS: hazard ratio = 1.360, 95% CI = 1.200-1.530, P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that marital status serves as an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS among patients with primary vaginal cancer, which supports that unmarried people need more individualized care strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Cancer Prevention aims to promote an increased awareness of all aspects of cancer prevention and to stimulate new ideas and innovations. The Journal has a wide-ranging scope, covering such aspects as descriptive and metabolic epidemiology, histopathology, genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, clinical medicine, intervention trials and public education, basic laboratory studies and special group studies. Although affiliated to a European organization, the journal addresses issues of international importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信